The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: DaeMyung Kang <charsyam@gmail.com>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Cc: Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] ntfs: harden MFT record and attribute parsing
Date: Sat,  9 May 2026 00:34:07 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260508153410.2624801-1-charsyam@gmail.com> (raw)

This series tightens fs/ntfs against malformed on-disk metadata and
fixes one off-by-one in the MFT bitmap scan.

Patches 1/3 and 3/3 are complementary: 1/3 rejects MFT records whose
attrs_offset points past bytes_in_use at record entry, and 3/3 moves
the per-attribute name bounds check earlier so it covers the AT_UNUSED
enumeration path that hands the name pointer back to callers.  Without
3/3, two enumeration paths can read past an attribute record: one in
fs/ntfs/attrib.c passes the returned name pointer to ntfs_attr_iget(),
and another in fs/ntfs/inode.c copies the name while building an
attribute list.

Patch 2/3 is independent: ntfs_mft_record_layout() rejects
mft_no >= 2^32, but the bitmap scan in
ntfs_mft_bitmap_find_and_alloc_free_rec_nolock() used '>'.  Bring it in
line with the other 2^32 boundary checks in fs/ntfs/mft.c.

All three carry the same Fixes tag (d3ad708fecaa) since the issues
date from the initial fs/ntfs commit in this tree.

DaeMyung Kang (3):
  ntfs: validate MFT attrs_offset against bytes_in_use
  ntfs: fix MFT bitmap scan 2^32 boundary check
  ntfs: validate attribute name bounds before returning it

 fs/ntfs/attrib.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
 fs/ntfs/mft.c    | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--
2.34.1

             reply	other threads:[~2026-05-08 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-08 15:34 DaeMyung Kang [this message]
2026-05-08 15:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] ntfs: validate MFT attrs_offset against bytes_in_use DaeMyung Kang
2026-05-08 15:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] ntfs: fix MFT bitmap scan 2^32 boundary check DaeMyung Kang
2026-05-09  4:03   ` Namjae Jeon
2026-05-09  6:14     ` CharSyam
2026-05-08 15:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] ntfs: validate attribute name bounds before returning it DaeMyung Kang
2026-05-09  6:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] ntfs: harden MFT record and attribute parsing DaeMyung Kang
2026-05-09 15:44   ` Namjae Jeon
2026-05-09  6:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ntfs: validate MFT attrs_offset against bytes_in_use DaeMyung Kang
2026-05-09  6:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ntfs: fix MFT bitmap scan 2^32 boundary check DaeMyung Kang
2026-05-09  6:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ntfs: validate attribute name bounds before returning it DaeMyung Kang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260508153410.2624801-1-charsyam@gmail.com \
    --to=charsyam@gmail.com \
    --cc=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox