From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Kai Aizen <kai.aizen.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com, will@kernel.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iommufd: Use sizeof(*hdr) instead of sizeof(hdr) in veventq read
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 20:37:11 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260508233711.GJ9254@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430175630.67078-1-kai.aizen.dev@gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 08:56:30PM +0300, Kai Aizen wrote:
> The bound-check in iommufd_veventq_fops_read() for the normal vEVENT
> path uses sizeof(hdr) where the surrounding code uses sizeof(*hdr):
>
> if (!vevent_for_lost_events_header(cur) &&
> sizeof(hdr) + cur->data_len > count - done) {
>
> hdr is declared as struct iommufd_vevent_header *, so sizeof(hdr)
> evaluates to the size of the pointer. Surrounding code uses
> sizeof(*hdr) consistently:
>
> if (done >= count || sizeof(*hdr) > count - done) {
> ...
> if (copy_to_user(buf + done, hdr, sizeof(*hdr))) {
> ...
> done += sizeof(*hdr);
>
> struct iommufd_vevent_header is currently 8 bytes (two __u32 fields,
> flags and sequence), so on 64-bit (sizeof(void *) == 8) the two
> expressions happen to be equal and the check works as intended.
>
> On 32-bit (sizeof(void *) == 4) the check under-counts the header by
> 4 bytes: a vEVENT whose data_len causes 8 + cur->data_len to exceed
> count - done while 4 + cur->data_len does not will pass the check,
> then the loop will copy_to_user 8 bytes of header followed by data_len
> bytes of payload, writing past the user-supplied buffer.
>
> It is also a latent bug for any future expansion of struct
> iommufd_vevent_header beyond sizeof(void *) on 64-bit; the check
> should not depend on the type happening to match the host pointer
> width.
>
> Use sizeof(*hdr) to match the rest of the function and the actual
> amount that will be copied.
>
> Fixes: e36ba5ab808e ("iommufd: Add IOMMUFD_OBJ_VEVENTQ and IOMMUFD_CMD_VEVENTQ_ALLOC")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Kai Aizen <kai.aizen.dev@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kai Aizen <kai.aizen.dev@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: fix From/Signed-off-by to use real name and email address.
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommufd/eventq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied to for-rc, thanks
Jason
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-08 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260430175630.67078-1-kai.aizen.dev@gmail.com>
2026-05-05 3:26 ` [PATCH v2] iommufd: Use sizeof(*hdr) instead of sizeof(hdr) in veventq read Baolu Lu
2026-05-05 3:45 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-05-08 8:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-05-08 23:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260508233711.GJ9254@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kai.aizen.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox