The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	sashiko-bot@kernel.org,
	"Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context)" <noreply@anthropic.com>
Subject: [PATCH 21/28] perf header: Validate bitmap size before allocating in do_read_bitmap()
Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 00:34:12 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260510033424.255812-22-acme@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260510033424.255812-1-acme@kernel.org>

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

do_read_bitmap() reads a u64 bit count from the file and passes it
to bitmap_zalloc() without checking it against the remaining section
size. A crafted perf.data could trigger a large allocation that would
only fail later when the per-element reads exceed section bounds.

Additionally, bitmap_zalloc() takes an int parameter, so a crafted
size with bits set above bit 31 (e.g. 0x100000040) would pass the
section bounds check but truncate when passed to bitmap_zalloc(),
allocating a much smaller buffer than the subsequent read loop
expects.

Reject size values that exceed INT_MAX, and check that the data
needed (BITS_TO_U64(size) u64 values) fits in the remaining section
before allocating.  Switch from bitmap_zalloc() to calloc() of u64
units so the allocation size matches the u64 read/write granularity
and avoids unsigned long vs u64 mismatch on 32-bit architectures.

Fix do_write_bitmap() to cast via u64* rather than reading
unsigned long values from the bitmap directly, preventing
out-of-bounds reads on 32-bit systems where sizeof(unsigned long)
is 4 but the bitmap is stored in u64 units.

Fix process_mem_topology() minimum section size: the check used
nr * 2 * sizeof(u64) per node, but do_read_bitmap() reads an
additional u64 for the bitmap size, so the minimum is 3 * sizeof(u64).

Fix memory leak in process_mem_topology() error paths: replace
free(nodes) with memory_node__delete_nodes() to free per-node
bitmaps allocated by do_read_bitmap().

Currently used by process_mem_topology() for HEADER_MEM_TOPOLOGY.

Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org # Running on a local machine
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20260414224622.2AE69C19425@smtp.kernel.org/
Fixes: a881fc56038a ("perf header: Sanity check HEADER_MEM_TOPOLOGY")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20260410223242.DD76FC19421@smtp.kernel.org/
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Assisted-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/header.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
index 0bbe90865e9c1ceb..bda8705e87648800 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
@@ -178,15 +178,25 @@ int do_write(struct feat_fd *ff, const void *buf, size_t size)
 /* Return: 0 if succeeded, -ERR if failed. */
 static int do_write_bitmap(struct feat_fd *ff, unsigned long *set, u64 size)
 {
-	u64 *p = (u64 *) set;
+	size_t byte_size = BITS_TO_LONGS(size) * sizeof(unsigned long);
 	int i, ret;
 
 	ret = do_write(ff, &size, sizeof(size));
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
+	/*
+	 * The on-disk format uses u64 elements, but the in-memory bitmap
+	 * uses unsigned long, which is only 4 bytes on 32-bit architectures.
+	 * Copy with bounded size so the last element doesn't read past the
+	 * bitmap allocation when BITS_TO_LONGS(size) is odd.
+	 */
 	for (i = 0; (u64) i < BITS_TO_U64(size); i++) {
-		ret = do_write(ff, p + i, sizeof(*p));
+		u64 val = 0;
+		size_t off = i * sizeof(val);
+
+		memcpy(&val, (char *)set + off, min(sizeof(val), byte_size - off));
+		ret = do_write(ff, &val, sizeof(val));
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return ret;
 	}
@@ -332,7 +342,18 @@ static int do_read_bitmap(struct feat_fd *ff, unsigned long **pset, u64 *psize)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	set = bitmap_zalloc(size);
+	/* Bitmap APIs use int for nbits; reject u64 values that truncate. */
+	if (size > INT_MAX ||
+	    BITS_TO_U64(size) > (ff->size - ff->offset) / sizeof(u64))
+		return -1;
+
+	/*
+	 * bitmap_zalloc() allocates in unsigned long units, which are only
+	 * 4 bytes on 32-bit architectures. The read loop below casts the
+	 * buffer to u64 * and writes 8-byte elements, so allocate in u64
+	 * units to ensure the buffer is large enough.
+	 */
+	set = calloc(BITS_TO_U64(size), sizeof(u64));
 	if (!set)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -3488,7 +3509,7 @@ static int process_mem_topology(struct feat_fd *ff,
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	if (ff->size < 3 * sizeof(u64) + nr * 2 * sizeof(u64)) {
+	if (ff->size < 3 * sizeof(u64) + nr * 3 * sizeof(u64)) {
 		pr_err("Invalid HEADER_MEM_TOPOLOGY: section too small (%zu) for %llu nodes\n",
 		       ff->size, (unsigned long long)nr);
 		return -1;
@@ -3523,7 +3544,7 @@ static int process_mem_topology(struct feat_fd *ff,
 
 out:
 	if (ret)
-		free(nodes);
+		memory_node__delete_nodes(nodes, nr);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.54.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-10  3:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-10  3:33 [PATCH 00/28] perf: Harden perf.data parsing against crafted/corrupted files Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 01/28] perf session: Add minimum event size validation table Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-11 19:01   ` Ian Rogers
2026-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 02/28] perf tools: Fix event_contains() macro to verify full field extent Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 03/28] perf zstd: Fix compression error path in zstd_compress_stream_to_records() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 04/28] perf zstd: Fix multi-iteration decompression and error handling Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 05/28] perf session: Fix PERF_RECORD_READ swap and dump for variable-length events Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 06/28] perf session: Align auxtrace_info priv size before byte-swapping Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 07/28] perf session: Add validated swap infrastructure with null-termination checks Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 08/28] perf session: Use bounded copy for PERF_RECORD_TIME_CONV Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 09/28] perf session: Validate HEADER_ATTR alignment and attr.size before swapping Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 10/28] perf session: Validate nr fields against event size on both swap and common paths Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 11/28] perf header: Byte-swap build ID event pid and bounds check section entries Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 12/28] perf cpumap: Reject RANGE_CPUS with start_cpu > end_cpu Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 13/28] perf auxtrace: Harden auxtrace_error event handling Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 14/28] perf session: Add byte-swap and bounds check for PERF_RECORD_BPF_METADATA events Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 15/28] perf header: Validate null-termination in PERF_RECORD_EVENT_UPDATE string fields Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 16/28] perf tools: Bounds check perf_event_attr fields against attr.size before printing Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 17/28] perf header: Propagate feature section processing errors Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 18/28] perf header: Validate f_attr.ids section before use in perf_session__read_header() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 19/28] perf header: Validate feature section size and add read path bounds checking Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 20/28] perf header: Sanity check HEADER_EVENT_DESC attr.size before swap Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 22/28] perf session: Add byte-swap for PERF_RECORD_COMPRESSED2 events Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 23/28] perf tools: Harden compressed event processing Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 24/28] perf session: Check for decompression buffer size overflow Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 25/28] perf session: Bound nr_cpus_avail and validate sample CPU Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 26/28] perf timechart: Bounds check cpu_id and fix topology_map allocation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 27/28] perf kwork: Bounds check work->cpu before indexing cpus_runtime[] Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 28/28] perf test: Add truncated perf.data robustness test Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260510033424.255812-22-acme@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=noreply@anthropic.com \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox