* [PATCH v5] iio: imu: kmx61: Use guard(mutex)() over manual locking
@ 2026-05-07 22:33 Maxwell Doose
2026-05-08 13:03 ` Maxwell Doose
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maxwell Doose @ 2026-05-07 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jic23
Cc: David Lechner, Nuno Sá, Andy Shevchenko,
open list:IIO SUBSYSTEM AND DRIVERS, open list
Include linux/cleanup.h to take advantage of new macros.
Replace manual mutex_lock() and mutex_unlock() calls across the file
with guard(mutex)() and scoped_guard() where appropriate to simplify
error paths and eliminate manual locking calls.
Add new helper function kmx61_read_for_each_active_channel() to mitigate
certain style issues and to prevent notifying that the IRQ is finished
whilst holding the lock.
Update certain returns, and add default case to return -EINVAL in
kmx61_read_raw().
Remove now-redundant gotos and ret variables, as the new RAII macros
make them unneeded.
Signed-off-by: Maxwell Doose <m32285159@gmail.com>
---
v2:
- Remove redundant blank line per Andy.
- Put kmx61_set_mode() function call in kmx61_runtime_suspend() on one
line per Andy.
v3:
- Add dedicated scope for guards.
v4:
- Fix certain scoping in switch-case blocks.
- Remove stray ret variable.
- Used scoped_guard() in kmx61_trigger_handler() instead of guard()().
v5:
- Added new helper function kmx61_read_for_each_active_channel() per
Jonathan's suggestion.
- Add default case to return -EINVAL in kmx61_read_raw() per Andy's
suggestion.
- Add blank lines between guard(mutex)() calls and regular code per
Andy's suggestion.
- Change last return statement of kmx61_write_event_config() to be 0
per Jonathan's suggestion.
drivers/iio/imu/kmx61.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/kmx61.c b/drivers/iio/imu/kmx61.c
index 3cd91d8a89ee..fe3f357c8889 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/imu/kmx61.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/imu/kmx61.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
* IIO driver for KMX61 (7-bit I2C slave address 0x0E or 0x0F).
*/
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
#include <linux/i2c.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
@@ -783,7 +784,7 @@ static int kmx61_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
struct kmx61_data *data = kmx61_get_data(indio_dev);
switch (mask) {
- case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
+ case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW: {
switch (chan->type) {
case IIO_ACCEL:
base_reg = KMX61_ACC_XOUT_L;
@@ -794,28 +795,24 @@ static int kmx61_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
- mutex_lock(&data->lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&data->lock);
ret = kmx61_set_power_state(data, true, chan->address);
- if (ret) {
- mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
+ if (ret)
return ret;
- }
ret = kmx61_read_measurement(data, base_reg, chan->scan_index);
if (ret < 0) {
kmx61_set_power_state(data, false, chan->address);
- mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
return ret;
}
*val = sign_extend32(ret >> chan->scan_type.shift,
chan->scan_type.realbits - 1);
ret = kmx61_set_power_state(data, false, chan->address);
-
- mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
if (ret)
return ret;
return IIO_VAL_INT;
+ }
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
switch (chan->type) {
case IIO_ACCEL:
@@ -834,41 +831,41 @@ static int kmx61_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
if (chan->type != IIO_ACCEL && chan->type != IIO_MAGN)
return -EINVAL;
- mutex_lock(&data->lock);
- ret = kmx61_get_odr(data, val, val2, chan->address);
- mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
+ scoped_guard(mutex, &data->lock)
+ ret = kmx61_get_odr(data, val, val2, chan->address);
if (ret)
return -EINVAL;
return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
}
- return -EINVAL;
+
}
static int kmx61_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int val,
int val2, long mask)
{
- int ret;
struct kmx61_data *data = kmx61_get_data(indio_dev);
switch (mask) {
- case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
+ case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ: {
if (chan->type != IIO_ACCEL && chan->type != IIO_MAGN)
return -EINVAL;
- mutex_lock(&data->lock);
- ret = kmx61_set_odr(data, val, val2, chan->address);
- mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
- return ret;
+ guard(mutex)(&data->lock);
+
+ return kmx61_set_odr(data, val, val2, chan->address);
+ }
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
switch (chan->type) {
- case IIO_ACCEL:
+ case IIO_ACCEL: {
if (val != 0)
return -EINVAL;
- mutex_lock(&data->lock);
- ret = kmx61_set_scale(data, val2);
- mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
- return ret;
+ guard(mutex)(&data->lock);
+
+ return kmx61_set_scale(data, val2);
+ }
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -945,29 +942,26 @@ static int kmx61_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
if (state && data->ev_enable_state)
return 0;
- mutex_lock(&data->lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&data->lock);
if (!state && data->motion_trig_on) {
data->ev_enable_state = false;
- goto err_unlock;
+ return ret;
}
ret = kmx61_set_power_state(data, state, KMX61_ACC);
if (ret < 0)
- goto err_unlock;
+ return ret;
ret = kmx61_setup_any_motion_interrupt(data, state);
if (ret < 0) {
kmx61_set_power_state(data, false, KMX61_ACC);
- goto err_unlock;
+ return ret;
}
data->ev_enable_state = state;
-err_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
-
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
static int kmx61_acc_validate_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
@@ -1020,11 +1014,11 @@ static int kmx61_data_rdy_trigger_set_state(struct iio_trigger *trig,
struct iio_dev *indio_dev = iio_trigger_get_drvdata(trig);
struct kmx61_data *data = kmx61_get_data(indio_dev);
- mutex_lock(&data->lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&data->lock);
if (!state && data->ev_enable_state && data->motion_trig_on) {
data->motion_trig_on = false;
- goto err_unlock;
+ return ret;
}
if (data->acc_dready_trig == trig || data->motion_trig == trig)
@@ -1034,7 +1028,7 @@ static int kmx61_data_rdy_trigger_set_state(struct iio_trigger *trig,
ret = kmx61_set_power_state(data, state, device);
if (ret < 0)
- goto err_unlock;
+ return ret;
if (data->acc_dready_trig == trig || data->mag_dready_trig == trig)
ret = kmx61_setup_new_data_interrupt(data, state, device);
@@ -1042,7 +1036,7 @@ static int kmx61_data_rdy_trigger_set_state(struct iio_trigger *trig,
ret = kmx61_setup_any_motion_interrupt(data, state);
if (ret < 0) {
kmx61_set_power_state(data, false, device);
- goto err_unlock;
+ return ret;
}
if (data->acc_dready_trig == trig)
@@ -1051,8 +1045,6 @@ static int kmx61_data_rdy_trigger_set_state(struct iio_trigger *trig,
data->mag_dready_trig_on = state;
else
data->motion_trig_on = state;
-err_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
return ret;
}
@@ -1181,30 +1173,52 @@ static irqreturn_t kmx61_data_rdy_trig_poll(int irq, void *private)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
-static irqreturn_t kmx61_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
+/**
+ * kmx61_read_for_each_active_channel() - Read each active channel into a buffer
+ *
+ * @indio_dev: IIO Device struct to read from
+ * @buffer: Destination buffer to write to, the array must be of at least size 8
+ *
+ * Intended only for use in kmx61_trigger_handler().
+ *
+ * Return:
+ * 0 on success, negative errno on failure.
+ */
+static int kmx61_read_for_each_active_channel(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, s16 *buffer)
{
- struct iio_poll_func *pf = p;
- struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
struct kmx61_data *data = kmx61_get_data(indio_dev);
- int bit, ret, i = 0;
u8 base;
- s16 buffer[8] = { };
+ int ret, bit;
+ int i = 0;
if (indio_dev == data->acc_indio_dev)
base = KMX61_ACC_XOUT_L;
else
base = KMX61_MAG_XOUT_L;
- mutex_lock(&data->lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&data->lock);
+
iio_for_each_active_channel(indio_dev, bit) {
ret = kmx61_read_measurement(data, base, bit);
if (ret < 0) {
- mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
- goto err;
+ return ret;
}
buffer[i++] = ret;
}
- mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t kmx61_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
+{
+ struct iio_poll_func *pf = p;
+ struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
+ int ret;
+ s16 buffer[8] = { };
+
+ ret = kmx61_read_for_each_active_channel(indio_dev, buffer);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto err;
iio_push_to_buffers(indio_dev, buffer);
err:
@@ -1419,22 +1433,18 @@ static void kmx61_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
iio_trigger_unregister(data->motion_trig);
}
- mutex_lock(&data->lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&data->lock);
+
kmx61_set_mode(data, KMX61_ALL_STBY, KMX61_ACC | KMX61_MAG, true);
- mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
}
static int kmx61_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
- int ret;
struct kmx61_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(to_i2c_client(dev));
- mutex_lock(&data->lock);
- ret = kmx61_set_mode(data, KMX61_ALL_STBY, KMX61_ACC | KMX61_MAG,
- false);
- mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&data->lock);
- return ret;
+ return kmx61_set_mode(data, KMX61_ALL_STBY, KMX61_ACC | KMX61_MAG, false);
}
static int kmx61_resume(struct device *dev)
@@ -1453,13 +1463,10 @@ static int kmx61_resume(struct device *dev)
static int kmx61_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
struct kmx61_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(to_i2c_client(dev));
- int ret;
- mutex_lock(&data->lock);
- ret = kmx61_set_mode(data, KMX61_ALL_STBY, KMX61_ACC | KMX61_MAG, true);
- mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&data->lock);
- return ret;
+ return kmx61_set_mode(data, KMX61_ALL_STBY, KMX61_ACC | KMX61_MAG, true);
}
static int kmx61_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v5] iio: imu: kmx61: Use guard(mutex)() over manual locking
2026-05-07 22:33 [PATCH v5] iio: imu: kmx61: Use guard(mutex)() over manual locking Maxwell Doose
@ 2026-05-08 13:03 ` Maxwell Doose
2026-05-11 17:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maxwell Doose @ 2026-05-08 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jic23
Cc: David Lechner, Nuno Sá, Andy Shevchenko,
open list:IIO SUBSYSTEM AND DRIVERS, open list
Hi Jonathan,
On Thu, May 7, 2026 at 5:33 PM Maxwell Doose <m32285159@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[snip]
> @@ -945,29 +942,26 @@ static int kmx61_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> if (state && data->ev_enable_state)
> return 0;
>
> - mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> + guard(mutex)(&data->lock);
>
Correct me if I'm wrong but this looks like a TOCTOU race, was
reported by sashiko at
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260507223337.48437-1-m32285159%40gmail.com.
If this is a confirmed race I'll get a fix out this evening.
best regards,
max
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5] iio: imu: kmx61: Use guard(mutex)() over manual locking
2026-05-08 13:03 ` Maxwell Doose
@ 2026-05-11 17:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-11 17:27 ` Maxwell Doose
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2026-05-11 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maxwell Doose
Cc: David Lechner, Nuno Sá, Andy Shevchenko,
open list:IIO SUBSYSTEM AND DRIVERS, open list
On Fri, 8 May 2026 08:03:45 -0500
Maxwell Doose <m32285159@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2026 at 5:33 PM Maxwell Doose <m32285159@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> [snip]
> > @@ -945,29 +942,26 @@ static int kmx61_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > if (state && data->ev_enable_state)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> > + guard(mutex)(&data->lock);
> >
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong but this looks like a TOCTOU race, was
> reported by sashiko at
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260507223337.48437-1-m32285159%40gmail.com.
> If this is a confirmed race I'll get a fix out this evening.
Indeed looks like a correct report.
Take your time though. I'm swamped anyway so will be a while before
I get to any new patches (probably!)
>
> best regards,
> max
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5] iio: imu: kmx61: Use guard(mutex)() over manual locking
2026-05-11 17:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
@ 2026-05-11 17:27 ` Maxwell Doose
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maxwell Doose @ 2026-05-11 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron
Cc: David Lechner, Nuno Sá, Andy Shevchenko,
open list:IIO SUBSYSTEM AND DRIVERS, open list
On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 12:17 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 May 2026 08:03:45 -0500
> Maxwell Doose <m32285159@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > On Thu, May 7, 2026 at 5:33 PM Maxwell Doose <m32285159@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > [snip]
> > > @@ -945,29 +942,26 @@ static int kmx61_write_event_config(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > > if (state && data->ev_enable_state)
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > - mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> > > + guard(mutex)(&data->lock);
> > >
> >
> > Correct me if I'm wrong but this looks like a TOCTOU race, was
> > reported by sashiko at
> > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260507223337.48437-1-m32285159%40gmail.com.
> > If this is a confirmed race I'll get a fix out this evening.
> Indeed looks like a correct report.
>
> Take your time though. I'm swamped anyway so will be a while before
> I get to any new patches (probably!)
>
Alrighty sounds good. Dunno if we merge this or not and then send the
fix just in case or if I base it off of the original. Former seems
preferable.
best regards,
max
> >
> > best regards,
> > max
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-11 17:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-07 22:33 [PATCH v5] iio: imu: kmx61: Use guard(mutex)() over manual locking Maxwell Doose
2026-05-08 13:03 ` Maxwell Doose
2026-05-11 17:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-11 17:27 ` Maxwell Doose
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox