From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Pramod Maurya <pramod.nexgen@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nikolayof23@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] staging: rtl8723bs: Enclose CHAN_ARG macro body in parentheses
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 10:12:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026051129-traverse-legged-af83@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260510175207.563378-5-pramod.nexgen@gmail.com>
On Sun, May 10, 2026 at 01:52:07PM -0400, Pramod Maurya wrote:
> Wrap the macro expansion in outer parentheses to prevent operator
> precedence issues when the macro is used in expressions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pramod Maurya <pramod.nexgen@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/ieee80211.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/ieee80211.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/ieee80211.h
> index beee37041eeb..d1167d9ea846 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/ieee80211.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/ieee80211.h
> @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ struct rtw_ieee80211_channel {
> /*"orig_mpwr:%d\n"*/
>
> #define CHAN_ARG(channel) \
> - /*(channel)->band*/ \
> + (/*(channel)->band*/ \
> /*, (channel)->center_freq*/ \
> (channel)->hw_value \
> , (channel)->flags \
> @@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ struct rtw_ieee80211_channel {
> /*, (channel)->beacon_found*/ \
> /*, (channel)->orig_flags*/ \
> /*, (channel)->orig_mag*/ \
> - /*, (channel)->orig_mpwr*/ \
> + /*, (channel)->orig_mpwr*/)
These are comments? That macro is crazy, why not fix it up properly?
And what precedence issue is being fixed here?
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-10 17:52 [PATCH v2 0/4] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix coding style in ieee80211.h Pramod Maurya
2026-05-10 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] staging: rtl8723bs: Replace __attribute__((packed)) with __packed " Pramod Maurya
2026-05-10 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix comparison style in IS_CCK_RATE and IS_OFDM_RATE macros Pramod Maurya
2026-05-11 3:48 ` Nikolay Kulikov
2026-05-11 8:11 ` Greg KH
2026-05-10 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix block comment style in ieee80211.h Pramod Maurya
2026-05-10 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] staging: rtl8723bs: Enclose CHAN_ARG macro body in parentheses Pramod Maurya
2026-05-10 19:58 ` Nikolay Kulikov
2026-05-11 8:12 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026051129-traverse-legged-af83@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nikolayof23@gmail.com \
--cc=pramod.nexgen@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox