The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com, chenridong@huaweicloud.com,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	vschneid@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	mkoutny@suse.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jstultz@google.com,
	kprateek.nayak@amd.com, qyousef@layalina.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] sched: Flatten the pick
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 09:25:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260513072507.GE1889694@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtBq6QO6yjL9SHWfL+pSoe=4_cddzYtqWGXtpLJmi8hSig@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 08:32:12PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2026 at 20:25, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 08:24:39PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 11:20:40AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 10:42:33AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I haven't reviewed the patches yet but I ran some tests with it while
> > > > > testing sched latency related changes for short slice wakeup
> > > > > preemption. I have some large hackbench regressions with this series
> > > > > on HMP system with and without EAS. those figures are unexpected
> > > > > because the benchs run on root cfs
> > > > >
> > > > > One example with hackbench 8 groups thread pipe
> > > > > tip/sched/core  tip/sched/core          +this patchset          +this patchset
> > > > > slice 2.8ms     16ms                    2.8ms                   16ms
> > > > > dragonboard rb5 with EAS
> > > > > 0,748(+/-4,6%)  0,621(+/-3.6%) +17%     1,915(+/-7.9%) -156%
> > > > > 0,689(+/- 9.1%) +8%
> > > > >
> > > > > radxa orion6 HMP without EAS
> > > > > 0,588(+/-5.8%)  0,677(+/-5.9%) -15%     1,505(+/-10%) -156%
> > > > > 1,071(+/-5.9%) -82%
> > > > >
> > > > > Increasing the slice partly removes regressions but tis is surprising
> > > > > because the bench runs at root cfs and I thought that results will not
> > > > > change in such a case
> > > > >
> > > > > I will review the patchset and try to get what is going wrong
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, that is unexpected. Let me go have another look too.
> > >
> > > So I can reproduce even without the last patch applied. I suspect it is
> > > in the cgroup mode patches somewhere. My first suspect is that concur
> > > mode thing doing bad things to track the 'global' nr_running thing.
> >
> > Argh, n/m PEBKAC. I'll try this again in the morning :/
> 
> Reverting the last patch is enough to recover performance

Yeah, I was on a fail-streak yesterday. I forgot to copy the kernel
image before reboot ...

Lets see if today is better :-)

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-13  7:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-11 11:31 [PATCH v2 00/10] sched: Flatten the pick Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] sched/debug: Use char * instead of char (*)[] Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] sched: Use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() for preempt_dynamic_mode Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] sched/debug: Collapse subsequent CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT sections Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] sched/fair: Add cgroup_mode switch Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] sched/fair: Add cgroup_mode: UP Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] sched/fair: Add cgroup_mode: MAX Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] sched/fair: Add cgroup_mode: CONCUR Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] sched/fair: Add newidle balance to pick_task_fair() Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12  5:37   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-12  9:45     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] sched: Remove sched_class::pick_next_task() Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] sched/eevdf: Move to a single runqueue Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 16:21   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-12 11:09     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-13  7:01       ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-13  7:25         ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-13  4:51   ` John Stultz
2026-05-13  5:00     ` John Stultz
2026-05-11 19:23 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] sched: Flatten the pick Tejun Heo
2026-05-12  8:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 18:45     ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-12  8:42 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-12  9:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 18:24     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 18:25       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 18:32         ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-13  7:25           ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-05-13 11:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-13 12:43     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260513072507.GE1889694@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox