From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com, chenridong@huaweicloud.com,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
vschneid@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
mkoutny@suse.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jstultz@google.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, qyousef@layalina.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] sched: Flatten the pick
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 13:35:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260513113510.GK1889694@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtA2aBtuBffVV02VgsRRi5mRK0G5ununzuvJ7h7buygNxg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 10:42:33AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> I haven't reviewed the patches yet but I ran some tests with it while
> testing sched latency related changes for short slice wakeup
> preemption. I have some large hackbench regressions with this series
> on HMP system with and without EAS. those figures are unexpected
> because the benchs run on root cfs
>
> One example with hackbench 8 groups thread pipe
> tip/sched/core tip/sched/core +this patchset +this patchset
> slice 2.8ms 16ms 2.8ms 16ms
> dragonboard rb5 with EAS
> 0,748(+/-4,6%) 0,621(+/-3.6%) +17% 1,915(+/-7.9%) -156%
> 0,689(+/- 9.1%) +8%
>
> radxa orion6 HMP without EAS
> 0,588(+/-5.8%) 0,677(+/-5.9%) -15% 1,505(+/-10%) -156%
> 1,071(+/-5.9%) -82%
>
> Increasing the slice partly removes regressions but tis is surprising
> because the bench runs at root cfs and I thought that results will not
> change in such a case
D'oh :/
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index e54da4c6c945..77d0e1937f2c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9071,7 +9071,7 @@ static void wakeup_preempt_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_f
enum preempt_wakeup_action preempt_action = PREEMPT_WAKEUP_PICK;
struct task_struct *donor = rq->donor;
struct sched_entity *nse, *se = &donor->se, *pse = &p->se;
- struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(donor);
+ struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = &rq->cfs;
int cse_is_idle, pse_is_idle;
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 11:31 [PATCH v2 00/10] sched: Flatten the pick Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] sched/debug: Use char * instead of char (*)[] Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] sched: Use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() for preempt_dynamic_mode Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] sched/debug: Collapse subsequent CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT sections Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] sched/fair: Add cgroup_mode switch Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] sched/fair: Add cgroup_mode: UP Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] sched/fair: Add cgroup_mode: MAX Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] sched/fair: Add cgroup_mode: CONCUR Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] sched/fair: Add newidle balance to pick_task_fair() Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 5:37 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-12 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] sched: Remove sched_class::pick_next_task() Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] sched/eevdf: Move to a single runqueue Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 16:21 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-12 11:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-13 7:01 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-13 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-13 4:51 ` John Stultz
2026-05-13 5:00 ` John Stultz
2026-05-11 19:23 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] sched: Flatten the pick Tejun Heo
2026-05-12 8:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 18:45 ` Tejun Heo
2026-05-12 8:42 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-12 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 18:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 18:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-12 18:32 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-05-13 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-13 11:35 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-05-13 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260513113510.GK1889694@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox