From: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
To: Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@foss.st.com>,
Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: stm: stm32_sai_sub: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 17:43:28 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260513104329.81592-4-phucduc.bui@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513104329.81592-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
From: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Clean up the code using guard() for mutex & spin locks.
Merely code refactoring, and no behavior change.
Signed-off-by: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
---
sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c | 29 +++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c b/sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c
index 3e82fa90e719..ea9e8bddd63f 100644
--- a/sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c
+++ b/sound/soc/stm/stm32_sai_sub.c
@@ -280,9 +280,8 @@ static int snd_pcm_iec958_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
{
struct stm32_sai_sub_data *sai = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
- mutex_lock(&sai->ctrl_lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&sai->ctrl_lock);
memcpy(uctl->value.iec958.status, sai->iec958.status, 4);
- mutex_unlock(&sai->ctrl_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -292,9 +291,8 @@ static int snd_pcm_iec958_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
{
struct stm32_sai_sub_data *sai = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
- mutex_lock(&sai->ctrl_lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&sai->ctrl_lock);
memcpy(sai->iec958.status, uctl->value.iec958.status, 4);
- mutex_unlock(&sai->ctrl_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -658,10 +656,10 @@ static irqreturn_t stm32_sai_isr(int irq, void *devid)
status = SNDRV_PCM_STATE_XRUN;
}
- spin_lock(&sai->irq_lock);
- if (status != SNDRV_PCM_STATE_RUNNING && sai->substream)
- snd_pcm_stop_xrun(sai->substream);
- spin_unlock(&sai->irq_lock);
+ scoped_guard(spinlock, &sai->irq_lock) {
+ if (status != SNDRV_PCM_STATE_RUNNING && sai->substream)
+ snd_pcm_stop_xrun(sai->substream);
+ }
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -894,11 +892,9 @@ static int stm32_sai_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
{
struct stm32_sai_sub_data *sai = snd_soc_dai_get_drvdata(cpu_dai);
int imr, cr2, ret;
- unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&sai->irq_lock, flags);
- sai->substream = substream;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sai->irq_lock, flags);
+ scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &sai->irq_lock)
+ sai->substream = substream;
if (STM_SAI_PROTOCOL_IS_SPDIF(sai)) {
snd_pcm_hw_constraint_mask64(substream->runtime,
@@ -1083,7 +1079,7 @@ static void stm32_sai_set_iec958_status(struct stm32_sai_sub_data *sai,
return;
/* Force the sample rate according to runtime rate */
- mutex_lock(&sai->ctrl_lock);
+ guard(mutex)(&sai->ctrl_lock);
switch (runtime->rate) {
case 22050:
sai->iec958.status[3] = IEC958_AES3_CON_FS_22050;
@@ -1116,7 +1112,6 @@ static void stm32_sai_set_iec958_status(struct stm32_sai_sub_data *sai,
sai->iec958.status[3] = IEC958_AES3_CON_FS_NOTID;
break;
}
- mutex_unlock(&sai->ctrl_lock);
}
static int stm32_sai_configure_clock(struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai,
@@ -1284,7 +1279,6 @@ static void stm32_sai_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai)
{
struct stm32_sai_sub_data *sai = snd_soc_dai_get_drvdata(cpu_dai);
- unsigned long flags;
stm32_sai_sub_reg_up(sai, STM_SAI_IMR_REGX, SAI_XIMR_MASK, 0);
@@ -1298,9 +1292,8 @@ static void stm32_sai_shutdown(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
if (!sai->sai_mclk && sai->put_sai_ck_rate)
sai->put_sai_ck_rate(sai);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&sai->irq_lock, flags);
- sai->substream = NULL;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sai->irq_lock, flags);
+ scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &sai->irq_lock)
+ sai->substream = NULL;
}
static int stm32_sai_pcm_new(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd,
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 10:43 [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: stm: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-05-13 10:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: stm: stm32_adfsdm: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-05-13 10:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: stm: stm32_i2s: Use guard() for spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-05-13 10:43 ` phucduc.bui [this message]
2026-05-13 10:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] ASoC: stm: stm32_spdifrx: " phucduc.bui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260513104329.81592-4-phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--to=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=olivier.moysan@foss.st.com \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox