The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] mm/shrinker: simplify shrinker_memcg_alloc() using guard()
@ 2026-05-13  7:52 wangxuewen
  2026-05-13  7:55 ` Muchun Song
  2026-05-14  1:12 ` SeongJae Park
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: wangxuewen @ 2026-05-13  7:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, qi.zheng, roman.gushchin, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, wangxuewen, wangxuewen

Use guard(mutex) to automatically handle shrinker_mutex locking and
unlocking in shrinker_memcg_alloc(). This removes the explicit
mutex_unlock() call, the goto-based error path, and the redundant
ret variable, resulting in cleaner and more concise code.

v2:
- Drop unused 'ret' variable to avoid compiler warning (Muchun Song).

Signed-off-by: wangxuewen <wangxuewen@kylinos.cn>
---
 mm/shrinker.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/shrinker.c b/mm/shrinker.c
index 76b3f750cf65..cb03fbecc75d 100644
--- a/mm/shrinker.c
+++ b/mm/shrinker.c
@@ -215,29 +215,26 @@ static DEFINE_IDR(shrinker_idr);
 
 static int shrinker_memcg_alloc(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 {
-	int id, ret = -ENOMEM;
+	int id;
 
 	if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
 		return -ENOSYS;
 	if (mem_cgroup_kmem_disabled() && !(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NONSLAB))
 		return -ENOSYS;
 
-	mutex_lock(&shrinker_mutex);
+	guard(mutex)(&shrinker_mutex);
 	id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, shrinker, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (id < 0)
-		goto unlock;
+		return id;
 
 	if (id >= shrinker_nr_max) {
 		if (expand_shrinker_info(id)) {
 			idr_remove(&shrinker_idr, id);
-			goto unlock;
+			return -ENOMEM;
 		}
 	}
 	shrinker->id = id;
-	ret = 0;
-unlock:
-	mutex_unlock(&shrinker_mutex);
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static void shrinker_memcg_remove(struct shrinker *shrinker)
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] mm/shrinker: simplify shrinker_memcg_alloc() using guard()
  2026-05-13  7:52 [PATCH v2] mm/shrinker: simplify shrinker_memcg_alloc() using guard() wangxuewen
@ 2026-05-13  7:55 ` Muchun Song
  2026-05-14  1:12 ` SeongJae Park
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Muchun Song @ 2026-05-13  7:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wangxuewen
  Cc: akpm, david, qi.zheng, roman.gushchin, linux-mm, linux-kernel,
	wangxuewen



> On May 13, 2026, at 15:52, wangxuewen <18810879172@163.com> wrote:
> 
> Use guard(mutex) to automatically handle shrinker_mutex locking and
> unlocking in shrinker_memcg_alloc(). This removes the explicit
> mutex_unlock() call, the goto-based error path, and the redundant
> ret variable, resulting in cleaner and more concise code.
> 
> v2:
> - Drop unused 'ret' variable to avoid compiler warning (Muchun Song).

Changelog should not be placed here.

> 
> Signed-off-by: wangxuewen <wangxuewen@kylinos.cn>
> ---

The right place.

> mm/shrinker.c | 13 +++++--------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

The change looks good to me.

Acked-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>

Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] mm/shrinker: simplify shrinker_memcg_alloc() using guard()
  2026-05-13  7:52 [PATCH v2] mm/shrinker: simplify shrinker_memcg_alloc() using guard() wangxuewen
  2026-05-13  7:55 ` Muchun Song
@ 2026-05-14  1:12 ` SeongJae Park
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2026-05-14  1:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wangxuewen
  Cc: SeongJae Park, akpm, david, qi.zheng, roman.gushchin, muchun.song,
	linux-mm, linux-kernel, wangxuewen

On Wed, 13 May 2026 15:52:14 +0800 wangxuewen <18810879172@163.com> wrote:

> Use guard(mutex) to automatically handle shrinker_mutex locking and
> unlocking in shrinker_memcg_alloc(). This removes the explicit
> mutex_unlock() call, the goto-based error path, and the redundant
> ret variable, resulting in cleaner and more concise code.
> 
> v2:
> - Drop unused 'ret' variable to avoid compiler warning (Muchun Song).

Patch changelog should go to commentary area [1].  Also adding links to
previous versions would be helpful.

> 
> Signed-off-by: wangxuewen <wangxuewen@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>  mm/shrinker.c | 13 +++++--------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/shrinker.c b/mm/shrinker.c
> index 76b3f750cf65..cb03fbecc75d 100644
> --- a/mm/shrinker.c
> +++ b/mm/shrinker.c
> @@ -215,29 +215,26 @@ static DEFINE_IDR(shrinker_idr);
>  
>  static int shrinker_memcg_alloc(struct shrinker *shrinker)
>  {
> -	int id, ret = -ENOMEM;
> +	int id;
>  
>  	if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
>  		return -ENOSYS;
>  	if (mem_cgroup_kmem_disabled() && !(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NONSLAB))
>  		return -ENOSYS;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&shrinker_mutex);
> +	guard(mutex)(&shrinker_mutex);
>  	id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, shrinker, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (id < 0)
> -		goto unlock;
> +		return id;

Could this change the return value?  This code was always returning -ENOMEM
before, but seems it can now return -ENOSPC?  Seems that doesn't matter,
though.

>  
>  	if (id >= shrinker_nr_max) {
>  		if (expand_shrinker_info(id)) {
>  			idr_remove(&shrinker_idr, id);
> -			goto unlock;
> +			return -ENOMEM;
>  		}
>  	}
>  	shrinker->id = id;
> -	ret = 0;
> -unlock:
> -	mutex_unlock(&shrinker_mutex);
> -	return ret;
> +	return 0;
>  }

[1] https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#commentary


Thanks,
SJ

[...]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-14  1:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-13  7:52 [PATCH v2] mm/shrinker: simplify shrinker_memcg_alloc() using guard() wangxuewen
2026-05-13  7:55 ` Muchun Song
2026-05-14  1:12 ` SeongJae Park

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox