The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
	"Ahmed S . Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: Fix a F00F bug warning and cleanup surrounding code
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 17:24:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260515002500.2463393-1-sohil.mehta@intel.com> (raw)

This is an iteration of the series posted earlier by Richard Weinberger.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260216104343.3625292-1-richard@nod.at/

The patches primarily fix a harmless "alternatives_patched" warning that
affects the original Pentium (Family 5) processors with SMP. In this
revision, I reworded the commit messages and added a patch to simplify
the warning logic for the F00F bug. The patches seemed worth reposting
because the scope of the change is limited and it reduces lines of code.

The series is split into three patches for easier review. Let me know if
it would be preferable to merge them. Also, I wasn't sure whether the Fixes
tag in patch 1 is necessary. I left it inplace as Richard had it in his
original series, but it can be removed to avoid backporting hassles.

Richard Weinberger (2):
  x86/cpu/intel: Don't clear X86_BUG_F00F before setting it
  x86/cpufeature: Remove clear_cpu_bug()

Sohil Mehta (1):
  x86/cpu/intel: Simplify F00F bug notice using pr_notice_once()

 arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 -
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c       | 8 +-------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-05-15  0:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-15  0:24 Sohil Mehta [this message]
2026-05-15  0:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/cpu/intel: Don't clear X86_BUG_F00F before setting it Sohil Mehta
2026-05-15  0:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/cpu/intel: Simplify F00F bug notice using pr_notice_once() Sohil Mehta
2026-05-15  0:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/cpufeature: Remove clear_cpu_bug() Sohil Mehta
2026-05-15  6:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: Fix a F00F bug warning and cleanup surrounding code Richard Weinberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260515002500.2463393-1-sohil.mehta@intel.com \
    --to=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox