The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Cc: dave hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, bp <bp@alien8.de>,
	 x86 <x86@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	 mingo <mingo@redhat.com>, hpa <hpa@zytor.com>,
	 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	 andrew cooper3 <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	 Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	 "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>,
	 linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: Fix a F00F bug warning and cleanup surrounding code
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 08:18:15 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1502416086.3154.1778825895775.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260515002500.2463393-1-sohil.mehta@intel.com>

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Sohil Mehta" <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
> This is an iteration of the series posted earlier by Richard Weinberger.
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260216104343.3625292-1-richard@nod.at/
> 
> The patches primarily fix a harmless "alternatives_patched" warning that
> affects the original Pentium (Family 5) processors with SMP. In this
> revision, I reworded the commit messages and added a patch to simplify
> the warning logic for the F00F bug. The patches seemed worth reposting
> because the scope of the change is limited and it reduces lines of code.
> 
> The series is split into three patches for easier review. Let me know if
> it would be preferable to merge them. Also, I wasn't sure whether the Fixes
> tag in patch 1 is necessary. I left it inplace as Richard had it in his
> original series, but it can be removed to avoid backporting hassles.
> 
> Richard Weinberger (2):
>  x86/cpu/intel: Don't clear X86_BUG_F00F before setting it
>  x86/cpufeature: Remove clear_cpu_bug()
> 
> Sohil Mehta (1):
>  x86/cpu/intel: Simplify F00F bug notice using pr_notice_once()

Thanks for reviving these patches!
//richard

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-15  6:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-15  0:24 [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: Fix a F00F bug warning and cleanup surrounding code Sohil Mehta
2026-05-15  0:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/cpu/intel: Don't clear X86_BUG_F00F before setting it Sohil Mehta
2026-05-15  0:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/cpu/intel: Simplify F00F bug notice using pr_notice_once() Sohil Mehta
2026-05-15  0:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/cpufeature: Remove clear_cpu_bug() Sohil Mehta
2026-05-15  6:18 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1502416086.3154.1778825895775.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at \
    --to=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox