From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] drm/panthor: Automatically enable interrupts in panthor_fw_wait_acks()
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 10:16:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260518101656.6426fb18@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44d8b158-76bd-4ad5-9fd5-616afd432155@arm.com>
On Thu, 14 May 2026 15:25:07 +0100
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> wrote:
> On 12/05/2026 12:37, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Rather than assuming an interrupt is always expected for request
> > acks, temporarily enable the relevant interrupts when the polling-wait
> > failed. This should hopefully reduce the number of interrupts the CPU
> > has to process.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
>
> As mentioned in the other thread[1] it turns out this won't work with
> the current firmware.
>
> The firmware checks the interrupt mask before signalling the ACK - so
> enabling the bit in the mask just before waiting for it is problematic -
> the firmware may not see the addition in the mask and will not trigger
> the interrupt.
Is it a problem though? wait_event_timeout() will evaluate the
condition before going to sleep, so, if the FW raced with the
input->ack_irq_mask update, I assume the condition will evaluate to
true and wait_event_timeout() would return immediately. The only issue
is if the FW updates the output->ack register after reading
input->ack_irq_mask, but that would be weird, since the output->ack
update doesn't depend on input->ack_irq_mask, and raising an interrupt
before updating output->ack would be racy anyway.
Am I missing something?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-18 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 11:37 [PATCH v2 00/11] drm/panthor: Reduce dma_fence signalling latency Boris Brezillon
2026-05-12 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] drm/panthor: Make panthor_irq::state a non-atomic field Boris Brezillon
2026-05-12 18:40 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-12 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] drm/panthor: Move the register accessors before the IRQ helpers Boris Brezillon
2026-05-12 18:41 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-12 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] drm/panthor: Replace the panthor_irq macro machinery by inline helpers Boris Brezillon
2026-05-12 18:58 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-13 8:03 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-13 16:46 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-12 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] drm/panthor: Extend the IRQ logic to allow fast/hard IRQ handlers Boris Brezillon
2026-05-12 19:11 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-13 8:09 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-13 17:06 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-13 17:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-13 18:17 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-18 11:54 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-12 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] drm/panthor: Make panthor_fw_{update,toggle}_reqs() callable from IRQ context Boris Brezillon
2026-05-12 19:29 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-12 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] drm/panthor: Prepare the scheduler logic for FW events in " Boris Brezillon
2026-05-12 21:04 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-13 8:29 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-13 17:47 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-18 13:45 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-18 23:33 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-19 7:53 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-19 17:16 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-19 18:26 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-19 20:45 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-19 21:04 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-20 8:09 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-20 22:15 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-12 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] drm/panthor: Automate CSG IRQ processing at group unbind time Boris Brezillon
2026-05-12 21:16 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-14 14:17 ` Steven Price
2026-05-12 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] drm/panthor: Automatically enable interrupts in panthor_fw_wait_acks() Boris Brezillon
2026-05-12 21:55 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-13 8:42 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-13 17:14 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-14 14:25 ` Steven Price
2026-05-18 8:16 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2026-05-19 14:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-12 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] drm/panthor: Process FW events in IRQ context Boris Brezillon
2026-05-12 22:05 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-12 22:09 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-13 8:44 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-14 15:23 ` Steven Price
2026-05-12 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] drm/panthor: Use the irqsave variant of spin_lock in panthor_gpu_irq_handler() Boris Brezillon
2026-05-14 15:26 ` Steven Price
2026-05-18 8:04 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-12 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] drm/panthor: Process GPU events in IRQ context Boris Brezillon
2026-05-12 11:50 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-12 22:40 ` Chia-I Wu
2026-05-13 8:54 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-05-13 18:07 ` Chia-I Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260518101656.6426fb18@fedora \
--to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox