From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify global percpu data
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 22:51:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608145113.65857-7-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608145113.65857-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
If the arch, like s390x, does not support percpu insn, these cases won't
test global percpu data by checking FEAT_PERCPU_DATA support.
The following APIs have been tested for global percpu data:
1. bpf_map__set_initial_value()
2. bpf_map__initial_value()
3. generated percpu struct pointer pointing to internal map's mmaped data
4. bpf_map__lookup_elem() for global percpu data map
At the same time, the case is also tested with 'bpftool gen skeleton -L'.
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 2 +-
.../bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++
.../bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c | 31 +++
3 files changed, 228 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index d53b7e496ac9..d21064cfc066 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ LSKELS_SIGNED := fentry_test.c fexit_test.c atomics.c
# Generate both light skeleton and libbpf skeleton for these
LSKELS_EXTRA := test_ksyms_module.c test_ksyms_weak.c kfunc_call_test.c \
- kfunc_call_test_subprog.c
+ kfunc_call_test_subprog.c test_global_percpu_data.c
SKEL_BLACKLIST += $$(LSKELS) $$(LSKELS_SIGNED)
test_static_linked.skel.h-deps := test_static_linked1.bpf.o test_static_linked2.bpf.o
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c
index 8466332d7406..5abdb0b8b8b3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "bpf/libbpf_internal.h"
+#include "test_global_percpu_data.skel.h"
+#include "test_global_percpu_data.lskel.h"
void test_global_data_init(void)
{
@@ -60,3 +63,196 @@ void test_global_data_init(void)
free(newval);
bpf_object__close(obj);
}
+
+static void test_global_percpu_data_init(void)
+{
+ struct test_global_percpu_data__percpu *init_data, *data = NULL;
+ struct test_global_percpu_data__percpu init_value = {};
+ int key, prog_fd, err, num_cpus, num_online, i;
+ struct test_global_percpu_data *skel = NULL;
+ __u64 args[2] = {0x1234ULL, 0x5678ULL};
+ size_t elem_sz, init_data_sz;
+ struct bpf_map *map;
+ bool *online;
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
+ .ctx_in = args,
+ .ctx_size_in = sizeof(args),
+ .flags = BPF_F_TEST_RUN_ON_CPU,
+ );
+
+ num_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
+ if (!ASSERT_GT(num_cpus, 0, "libbpf_num_possible_cpus"))
+ return;
+
+ err = parse_cpu_mask_file("/sys/devices/system/cpu/online", &online, &num_online);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "parse_cpu_mask_file"))
+ return;
+
+ elem_sz = roundup(sizeof(*data), 8);
+ data = calloc(1, elem_sz);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(data, "calloc data"))
+ goto out;
+
+ skel = test_global_percpu_data__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_global_percpu_data__open"))
+ goto out;
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->percpu, "skel->percpu"))
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->data, -1, "skel->percpu->data");
+ ASSERT_FALSE(skel->percpu->run, "skel->percpu->run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->nums[6], 0, "skel->percpu->nums[6]");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->struct_data.i, -1, "struct_data.i");
+ ASSERT_FALSE(skel->percpu->struct_data.set, "struct_data.set");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->struct_data.nums[6], 0, "struct_data.nums[6]");
+
+ map = skel->maps.percpu;
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(bpf_map__type(map), BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY, "bpf_map__type"))
+ goto out;
+
+ init_value.data = 2;
+ init_value.nums[6] = -1;
+ init_value.struct_data.i = 2;
+ init_value.struct_data.nums[6] = -1;
+ err = bpf_map__set_initial_value(map, &init_value, sizeof(init_value));
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__set_initial_value"))
+ goto out;
+
+ init_data = bpf_map__initial_value(map, &init_data_sz);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(init_data, "bpf_map__initial_value"))
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(init_data->data, init_value.data, "init_value data");
+ ASSERT_EQ(init_data->run, init_value.run, "init_value run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(init_data->struct_data.i, init_value.struct_data.i, "init_value struct_data.i");
+ ASSERT_EQ(init_data->struct_data.nums[6], init_value.struct_data.nums[6],
+ "init_value struct_data.nums[6]");
+ ASSERT_EQ(init_data_sz, sizeof(init_value), "init_value size");
+ ASSERT_EQ((void *) init_data, (void *) skel->percpu, "skel->percpu eq init_data");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->data, init_value.data, "skel->percpu->data");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->run, init_value.run, "skel->percpu->run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->struct_data.i, init_value.struct_data.i,
+ "skel->percpu->struct_data.i");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->percpu->struct_data.nums[6], init_value.struct_data.nums[6],
+ "skel->percpu->struct_data.nums[6]");
+
+ err = test_global_percpu_data__load(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_global_percpu_data__load"))
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->percpu, "skel->percpu");
+
+ key = 0;
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.update_percpu_data);
+
+ /* run on every CPU */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_online; i++) {
+ __u64 flags;
+
+ if (!online[i])
+ continue;
+
+ topts.cpu = i;
+ topts.retval = 0;
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts");
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts retval");
+
+ flags = ((__u64) i << 32) | BPF_F_CPU;
+ err = bpf_map__lookup_elem(map, &key, sizeof(key), data, elem_sz, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__lookup_elem"))
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->data, 1, "data->data");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(data->run, "data->run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->nums[6], 0xc0de, "data->nums[6]");
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->struct_data.i, 1, "struct_data.i");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(data->struct_data.set, "struct_data.set");
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->struct_data.nums[6], 0xc0de, "struct_data.nums[6]");
+ }
+
+out:
+ test_global_percpu_data__destroy(skel);
+ free(data);
+ free(online);
+}
+
+static void test_global_percpu_data_lskel(void)
+{
+ int key, prog_fd, map_fd, err, num_cpus, num_online, i;
+ struct test_global_percpu_data__percpu *data = NULL;
+ struct test_global_percpu_data_lskel *lskel = NULL;
+ __u64 args[2] = {0x1234ULL, 0x5678ULL};
+ size_t elem_sz;
+ bool *online;
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
+ .ctx_in = args,
+ .ctx_size_in = sizeof(args),
+ .flags = BPF_F_TEST_RUN_ON_CPU,
+ );
+
+ num_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
+ if (!ASSERT_GT(num_cpus, 0, "libbpf_num_possible_cpus"))
+ return;
+
+ err = parse_cpu_mask_file("/sys/devices/system/cpu/online", &online, &num_online);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "parse_cpu_mask_file"))
+ return;
+
+ elem_sz = roundup(sizeof(*data), 8);
+ data = calloc(1, elem_sz);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(data, "calloc data"))
+ goto out;
+
+ lskel = test_global_percpu_data_lskel__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(lskel, "test_global_percpu_data_lskel__open_and_load"))
+ goto out;
+
+ key = 0;
+ map_fd = lskel->maps.percpu.map_fd;
+ prog_fd = lskel->progs.update_percpu_data.prog_fd;
+
+ /* run on every CPU */
+ for (i = 0; i < num_online; i++) {
+ __u64 flags;
+
+ if (!online[i])
+ continue;
+
+ topts.cpu = i;
+ topts.retval = 0;
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts");
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts retval");
+
+ flags = ((__u64) i << 32) | BPF_F_CPU;
+ err = bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(map_fd, &key, data, flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags"))
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->data, 1, "data->data");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(data->run, "data->run");
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->nums[6], 0xc0de, "data->nums[6]");
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->struct_data.i, 1, "struct_data.i");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(data->struct_data.set, "struct_data.set");
+ ASSERT_EQ(data->struct_data.nums[6], 0xc0de, "struct_data.nums[6]");
+ }
+
+out:
+ test_global_percpu_data_lskel__destroy(lskel);
+ free(data);
+ free(online);
+}
+
+void test_global_percpu_data(void)
+{
+ if (!feat_supported(NULL, FEAT_PERCPU_DATA)) {
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (test__start_subtest("init"))
+ test_global_percpu_data_init();
+ if (test__start_subtest("lskel"))
+ test_global_percpu_data_lskel();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ba92ffb0ca49
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+int data SEC(".percpu") = -1;
+int nums[7] SEC(".percpu");
+char run SEC(".percpu") = 0;
+struct {
+ char set;
+ int i;
+ int nums[7];
+} struct_data SEC(".percpu") = {
+ .set = 0,
+ .i = -1,
+};
+
+SEC("raw_tp/task_rename")
+__auxiliary
+int update_percpu_data(void *ctx)
+{
+ struct_data.nums[6] = 0xc0de;
+ struct_data.set = 1;
+ struct_data.i = 1;
+ nums[6] = 0xc0de;
+ data = 1;
+ run = 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 14:51 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/9] bpf: Introduce global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/9] bpf: Drop duplicate blank lines in verifier Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/9] bpf: Introduce global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 15:56 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/9] libbpf: Probe percpu data feature Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/9] libbpf: Add support for global percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/9] bpftool: Generate skeleton " Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 15:29 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-08 14:51 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 7/9] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify verifier log " Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 8/9] selftests/bpf: Add test to verify xlated insns " Leon Hwang
2026-06-08 14:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add test to verify bpf_iter " Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260608145113.65857-7-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox