The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@meta.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, vschneid@redhat.com,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] sched/deadline: defer WARN console output under rq->lock
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 22:14:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611021416.910555-5-riel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611021416.910555-1-riel@surriel.com>

Convert the WARN*() calls that run under rq->lock or ->pi_lock to the
SCHED_WARN*() variants, so their console output is deferred to irq_work
instead of being emitted synchronously (which can deadlock via
console_unlock() -> up(&console_sem) -> try_to_wake_up() while the lock
is held).

This should prevent a deadlock if these warnings fire with a legacy
or boot console configured.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 5ccb06effea0..089ff8e56ebf 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -217,8 +217,8 @@ void __add_running_bw(u64 dl_bw, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
 
 	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq));
 	dl_rq->running_bw += dl_bw;
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_rq->running_bw < old); /* overflow */
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_rq->running_bw > dl_rq->this_bw);
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_rq->running_bw < old); /* overflow */
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_rq->running_bw > dl_rq->this_bw);
 	/* kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
 	cpufreq_update_util(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq), 0);
 }
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ void __sub_running_bw(u64 dl_bw, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
 
 	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq));
 	dl_rq->running_bw -= dl_bw;
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_rq->running_bw > old); /* underflow */
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_rq->running_bw > old); /* underflow */
 	if (dl_rq->running_bw > old)
 		dl_rq->running_bw = 0;
 	/* kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ void __add_rq_bw(u64 dl_bw, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
 
 	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq));
 	dl_rq->this_bw += dl_bw;
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_rq->this_bw < old); /* overflow */
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_rq->this_bw < old); /* overflow */
 }
 
 static inline
@@ -254,10 +254,10 @@ void __sub_rq_bw(u64 dl_bw, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
 
 	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq));
 	dl_rq->this_bw -= dl_bw;
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_rq->this_bw > old); /* underflow */
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_rq->this_bw > old); /* underflow */
 	if (dl_rq->this_bw > old)
 		dl_rq->this_bw = 0;
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_rq->running_bw > dl_rq->this_bw);
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_rq->running_bw > dl_rq->this_bw);
 }
 
 static inline
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ void cancel_inactive_timer(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
 
 static void dl_change_utilization(struct task_struct *p, u64 new_bw)
 {
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(p->dl.flags & SCHED_FLAG_SUGOV);
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(p->dl.flags & SCHED_FLAG_SUGOV);
 
 	if (task_on_rq_queued(p))
 		return;
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ static void task_non_contending(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, bool dl_task)
 	if (dl_entity_is_special(dl_se))
 		return;
 
-	WARN_ON(dl_se->dl_non_contending);
+	SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_se->dl_non_contending);
 
 	zerolag_time = dl_se->deadline -
 		 div64_long((dl_se->runtime * dl_se->dl_period),
@@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ static void enqueue_pushable_dl_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	struct rb_node *leftmost;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&p->pushable_dl_tasks));
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&p->pushable_dl_tasks));
 
 	leftmost = rb_add_cached(&p->pushable_dl_tasks,
 				 &rq->dl.pushable_dl_tasks_root,
@@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ static struct rq *dl_task_offline_migration(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p
 			 * Failed to find any suitable CPU.
 			 * The task will never come back!
 			 */
-			WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_bandwidth_enabled());
+			SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_bandwidth_enabled());
 
 			/*
 			 * If admission control is disabled we
@@ -756,8 +756,8 @@ static inline void setup_new_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
 	struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se);
 	struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq);
 
-	WARN_ON(is_dl_boosted(dl_se));
-	WARN_ON(dl_time_before(rq_clock(rq), dl_se->deadline));
+	SCHED_WARN_ON(is_dl_boosted(dl_se));
+	SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_time_before(rq_clock(rq), dl_se->deadline));
 
 	/*
 	 * We are racing with the deadline timer. So, do nothing because
@@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ static void replenish_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
 	struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se);
 	struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq);
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(pi_of(dl_se)->dl_runtime <= 0);
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(pi_of(dl_se)->dl_runtime <= 0);
 
 	/*
 	 * This could be the case for a !-dl task that is boosted.
@@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ update_dl_revised_wakeup(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct rq *rq)
 	 *
 	 * See update_dl_entity() comments for further details.
 	 */
-	WARN_ON(dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, rq_clock(rq)));
+	SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, rq_clock(rq)));
 
 	dl_se->runtime = (dl_se->dl_density * laxity) >> BW_SHIFT;
 }
@@ -1080,7 +1080,7 @@ static int start_dl_timer(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
 	 * (current u > U).
 	 */
 	if (dl_se->dl_defer_armed) {
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(!dl_se->dl_throttled);
+		SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(!dl_se->dl_throttled);
 		act = ns_to_ktime(dl_se->deadline - dl_se->runtime);
 	} else {
 		/* act = deadline - rel-deadline + period */
@@ -1451,7 +1451,7 @@ static void update_curr_dl_se(struct rq *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64
 		/*
 		 * Non-servers would never get time accounted while throttled.
 		 */
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(!dl_server(dl_se));
+		SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(!dl_server(dl_se));
 
 		/*
 		 * While the server is marked idle, do not push out the
@@ -1492,7 +1492,7 @@ static void update_curr_dl_se(struct rq *rq, struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64
 		 * and queue right away. Otherwise nothing might queue it. That's similar
 		 * to what enqueue_dl_entity() does on start_dl_timer==0. For now, just warn.
 		 */
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(!start_dl_timer(dl_se));
+		SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(!start_dl_timer(dl_se));
 
 		return;
 	}
@@ -1806,7 +1806,7 @@ void dl_server_start(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
 	 */
 	rq->donor->sched_class->update_curr(rq);
 
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpu_online(cpu_of(rq))))
+	if (SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpu_online(cpu_of(rq))))
 		return;
 
 	trace_sched_dl_server_start_tp(dl_se, cpu_of(rq), dl_get_type(dl_se, rq));
@@ -1855,7 +1855,7 @@ void sched_init_dl_servers(void)
 
 		dl_se = &rq->fair_server;
 
-		WARN_ON(dl_server(dl_se));
+		SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_server(dl_se));
 
 		dl_server_apply_params(dl_se, runtime, period, 1);
 
@@ -1866,7 +1866,7 @@ void sched_init_dl_servers(void)
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT
 		dl_se = &rq->ext_server;
 
-		WARN_ON(dl_server(dl_se));
+		SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_server(dl_se));
 
 		dl_server_apply_params(dl_se, runtime, period, 1);
 
@@ -2098,7 +2098,7 @@ int dl_server_swap_bw(struct sched_dl_entity *detach_se,
 	struct dl_bw *dl_b;
 	int cpus, ret;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(attach_se->rq != rq);
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(attach_se->rq != rq);
 
 	scoped_guard (raw_spinlock, &dl_bw_of(cpu)->lock) {
 		dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
@@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ void inc_dl_tasks(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
 static inline
 void dec_dl_tasks(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
 {
-	WARN_ON(!dl_rq->dl_nr_running);
+	SCHED_WARN_ON(!dl_rq->dl_nr_running);
 	dl_rq->dl_nr_running--;
 
 	if (!dl_server(dl_se))
@@ -2357,7 +2357,7 @@ static void __enqueue_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
 {
 	struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se);
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&dl_se->rb_node));
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&dl_se->rb_node));
 
 	rb_add_cached(&dl_se->rb_node, &dl_rq->root, __dl_less);
 
@@ -2381,7 +2381,7 @@ static void __dequeue_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
 static void
 enqueue_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, int flags)
 {
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(on_dl_rq(dl_se));
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(on_dl_rq(dl_se));
 
 	update_stats_enqueue_dl(dl_rq_of_se(dl_se), dl_se, flags);
 
@@ -2782,7 +2782,7 @@ static void set_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
 	/* You can't push away the running task */
 	dequeue_pushable_dl_task(rq, p);
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_rq->curr);
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_rq->curr);
 	dl_rq->curr = dl_se;
 
 	if (!first)
@@ -2822,7 +2822,7 @@ static struct task_struct *__pick_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
 		return NULL;
 
 	dl_se = pick_next_dl_entity(dl_rq);
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!dl_se);
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(!dl_se);
 
 	if (dl_server(dl_se)) {
 		p = dl_se->server_pick_task(dl_se, rf);
@@ -2855,7 +2855,7 @@ static void put_prev_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct task_s
 
 	update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, 1);
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_rq->curr != dl_se);
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_rq->curr != dl_se);
 	dl_rq->curr = NULL;
 
 	if (task_is_blocked(p))
@@ -3037,12 +3037,12 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_pushable_dl_task(struct rq *rq)
 	if (!p)
 		return NULL;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(rq->cpu != task_cpu(p));
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(task_current(rq, p));
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(p->nr_cpus_allowed <= 1);
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(rq->cpu != task_cpu(p));
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(task_current(rq, p));
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(p->nr_cpus_allowed <= 1);
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!task_on_rq_queued(p));
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!dl_task(p));
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(!task_on_rq_queued(p));
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(!dl_task(p));
 
 	return p;
 }
@@ -3158,7 +3158,7 @@ static int push_dl_task(struct rq *rq)
 	if (is_migration_disabled(next_task))
 		return 0;
 
-	if (WARN_ON(next_task == rq->curr))
+	if (SCHED_WARN_ON(next_task == rq->curr))
 		return 0;
 
 	/* We might release rq lock */
@@ -3264,8 +3264,8 @@ static void pull_dl_task(struct rq *this_rq)
 		 */
 		if (p && dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline, dmin) &&
 		    dl_task_is_earliest_deadline(p, this_rq)) {
-			WARN_ON(p == src_rq->curr);
-			WARN_ON(!task_on_rq_queued(p));
+			SCHED_WARN_ON(p == src_rq->curr);
+			SCHED_WARN_ON(!task_on_rq_queued(p));
 
 			/*
 			 * Then we pull iff p has actually an earlier
@@ -3324,7 +3324,7 @@ static void set_cpus_allowed_dl(struct task_struct *p,
 	struct root_domain *src_rd;
 	struct rq *rq;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!dl_task(p));
+	SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE(!dl_task(p));
 
 	rq = task_rq(p);
 	src_rd = rq->rd;
-- 
2.53.0-Meta


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-11  2:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-11  2:14 [PATCH 0/9] sched: make WARN_ON under rq->lock deadlock-safe (SCHED_WARN_ON) Rik van Riel
2026-06-11  2:14 ` [PATCH 1/9] sched: add SCHED_WARN_ON()/SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE()/SCHED_WARN()/SCHED_WARN_ONCE() Rik van Riel
2026-06-11  2:14 ` [PATCH 2/9] sched/core: defer WARN console output under rq->lock Rik van Riel
2026-06-11  2:14 ` [PATCH 3/9] sched/fair: " Rik van Riel
2026-06-11  2:14 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2026-06-11  2:14 ` [PATCH 5/9] sched/rt: " Rik van Riel
2026-06-11  2:14 ` [PATCH 6/9] sched_ext: " Rik van Riel
2026-06-11  2:14 ` [PATCH 7/9] sched/core_sched: " Rik van Riel
2026-06-11  2:14 ` [PATCH 8/9] sched/deadline: " Rik van Riel
2026-06-11  2:14 ` [PATCH 9/9] sched/rt: " Rik van Riel
2026-06-11  7:43 ` [PATCH 0/9] sched: make WARN_ON under rq->lock deadlock-safe (SCHED_WARN_ON) Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-11 16:20   ` Rik van Riel
2026-06-11 19:19     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-12  1:53       ` Rik van Riel
2026-06-12  6:52         ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260611021416.910555-5-riel@surriel.com \
    --to=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox