The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	vschneid@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] sched: make WARN_ON under rq->lock deadlock-safe (SCHED_WARN_ON)
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 09:43:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611074344.GG48970@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611021416.910555-1-riel@surriel.com>


Sorry, no. I've said it before and I'll stick with it. Just no.

printk_deferred() is an abomination, it means that if you mess up the
machine properly you'll *NEVER* see the output.

As per always, printk() is the one that needs fixing, and IIRC they were
very close to getting there.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-11  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-11  2:14 [PATCH 0/9] sched: make WARN_ON under rq->lock deadlock-safe (SCHED_WARN_ON) Rik van Riel
2026-06-11  2:14 ` [PATCH 1/9] sched: add SCHED_WARN_ON()/SCHED_WARN_ON_ONCE()/SCHED_WARN()/SCHED_WARN_ONCE() Rik van Riel
2026-06-11  2:14 ` [PATCH 2/9] sched/core: defer WARN console output under rq->lock Rik van Riel
2026-06-11  2:14 ` [PATCH 3/9] sched/fair: " Rik van Riel
2026-06-11  2:14 ` [PATCH 4/9] sched/deadline: " Rik van Riel
2026-06-11  2:14 ` [PATCH 5/9] sched/rt: " Rik van Riel
2026-06-11  2:14 ` [PATCH 6/9] sched_ext: " Rik van Riel
2026-06-11  2:14 ` [PATCH 7/9] sched/core_sched: " Rik van Riel
2026-06-11  2:14 ` [PATCH 8/9] sched/deadline: " Rik van Riel
2026-06-11  2:14 ` [PATCH 9/9] sched/rt: " Rik van Riel
2026-06-11  7:43 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-06-11 16:20   ` [PATCH 0/9] sched: make WARN_ON under rq->lock deadlock-safe (SCHED_WARN_ON) Rik van Riel
2026-06-11 19:19     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-12  1:53       ` Rik van Riel
2026-06-12  6:52         ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260611074344.GG48970@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox