The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
	Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>,
	Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
	Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
	Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev>,
	linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 18/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst-atom-controls: Use guard() for mutex locks
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:58:59 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611115901.80438-19-phucduc.bui@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611115901.80438-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>

From: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>

Clean up the code using guard() for mutex locks.
In sst_algo_control_set() and sst_gain_put(), the mutex release point
moves from immediately before dev_err() to scope exit. However, the
affected path only emits a warning and immediately returns -EINVAL,
without any further processing, so the change does not affect behavior.
This is purely a code refactoring with no intended functional change.

Signed-off-by: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
---
 sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c | 85 +++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c
index 3629ceaaac17..54defde24397 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst-atom-controls.c
@@ -75,10 +75,9 @@ static int sst_fill_and_send_cmd(struct sst_data *drv,
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	mutex_lock(&drv->lock);
+	guard(mutex)(&drv->lock);
 	ret = sst_fill_and_send_cmd_unlocked(drv, ipc_msg, block,
 					task_id, pipe_id, cmd_data, len);
-	mutex_unlock(&drv->lock);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -167,15 +166,15 @@ static int sst_slot_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 	unsigned int val, mux;
 	u8 *map = is_tx ? sst_ssp_rx_map : sst_ssp_tx_map;
 
-	mutex_lock(&drv->lock);
-	val = 1 << ctl_no;
-	/* search which slot/channel has this bit set - there should be only one */
-	for (mux = e->max; mux > 0;  mux--)
-		if (map[mux - 1] & val)
-			break;
+	scoped_guard(mutex, &drv->lock) {
+		val = 1 << ctl_no;
+		/* search which slot/channel has this bit set - there should be only one */
+		for (mux = e->max; mux > 0;  mux--)
+			if (map[mux - 1] & val)
+				break;
 
-	ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] = mux;
-	mutex_unlock(&drv->lock);
+		ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] = mux;
+	}
 
 	dev_dbg(c->dev, "%s - %s map = %#x\n",
 			is_tx ? "tx channel" : "rx slot",
@@ -235,7 +234,7 @@ static int sst_slot_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 	if (mux > e->max - 1)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	mutex_lock(&drv->lock);
+	guard(mutex)(&drv->lock);
 	/* first clear all registers of this bit */
 	for (i = 0; i < e->max; i++)
 		map[i] &= ~val;
@@ -244,7 +243,6 @@ static int sst_slot_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 		/* kctl set to 'none' and we reset the bits so send IPC */
 		ret = sst_check_and_send_slot_map(drv, kcontrol);
 
-		mutex_unlock(&drv->lock);
 		return ret;
 	}
 
@@ -258,7 +256,6 @@ static int sst_slot_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 
 	ret = sst_check_and_send_slot_map(drv, kcontrol);
 
-	mutex_unlock(&drv->lock);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -354,13 +351,12 @@ static int sst_algo_control_set(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 	struct sst_algo_control *bc = (void *)kcontrol->private_value;
 
 	dev_dbg(cmpnt->dev, "control_name=%s\n", kcontrol->id.name);
-	mutex_lock(&drv->lock);
+	guard(mutex)(&drv->lock);
 	switch (bc->type) {
 	case SST_ALGO_PARAMS:
 		memcpy(bc->params, ucontrol->value.bytes.data, bc->max);
 		break;
 	default:
-		mutex_unlock(&drv->lock);
 		dev_err(cmpnt->dev, "Invalid Input- algo type:%d\n",
 				bc->type);
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -368,7 +364,6 @@ static int sst_algo_control_set(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 	/*if pipe is enabled, need to send the algo params from here*/
 	if (bc->w && bc->w->power)
 		ret = sst_send_algo_cmd(drv, bc);
-	mutex_unlock(&drv->lock);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -475,7 +470,7 @@ static int sst_gain_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 	struct sst_gain_mixer_control *mc = (void *)kcontrol->private_value;
 	struct sst_gain_value *gv = mc->gain_val;
 
-	mutex_lock(&drv->lock);
+	guard(mutex)(&drv->lock);
 
 	switch (mc->type) {
 	case SST_GAIN_TLV:
@@ -497,7 +492,6 @@ static int sst_gain_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 		break;
 
 	default:
-		mutex_unlock(&drv->lock);
 		dev_err(cmpnt->dev, "Invalid Input- gain type:%d\n",
 				mc->type);
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -506,7 +500,6 @@ static int sst_gain_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
 	if (mc->w && mc->w->power)
 		ret = sst_send_gain_cmd(drv, gv, mc->task_id,
 			mc->pipe_id | mc->instance_id, mc->module_id, 0);
-	mutex_unlock(&drv->lock);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -521,10 +514,9 @@ static int sst_send_pipe_module_params(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
 	struct sst_data *drv = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(c);
 	struct sst_ids *ids = w->priv;
 
-	mutex_lock(&drv->lock);
+	guard(mutex)(&drv->lock);
 	sst_find_and_send_pipe_algo(drv, w->name, ids);
 	sst_set_pipe_gain(ids, drv, 0);
-	mutex_unlock(&drv->lock);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -761,27 +753,27 @@ int sst_handle_vb_timer(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, bool enable)
 			return ret;
 	}
 
-	mutex_lock(&drv->lock);
-	if (enable)
-		timer_usage++;
-	else
-		timer_usage--;
-
-	/*
-	 * Send the command only if this call is the first enable or last
-	 * disable
-	 */
-	if ((enable && (timer_usage == 1)) ||
-	    (!enable && (timer_usage == 0))) {
-		ret = sst_fill_and_send_cmd_unlocked(drv, SST_IPC_IA_CMD,
-				SST_FLAG_BLOCKED, SST_TASK_SBA, 0, &cmd,
-				sizeof(cmd.header) + cmd.header.length);
-		if (ret && enable) {
+	scoped_guard(mutex, &drv->lock) {
+		if (enable)
+			timer_usage++;
+		else
 			timer_usage--;
-			enable  = false;
+
+		/*
+		 * Send the command only if this call is the first enable or last
+		 * disable
+		 */
+		if ((enable && (timer_usage == 1)) ||
+		    (!enable && (timer_usage == 0))) {
+			ret = sst_fill_and_send_cmd_unlocked(drv, SST_IPC_IA_CMD,
+					SST_FLAG_BLOCKED, SST_TASK_SBA, 0, &cmd,
+					sizeof(cmd.header) + cmd.header.length);
+			if (ret && enable) {
+				timer_usage--;
+				enable  = false;
+			}
 		}
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&drv->lock);
 
 	if (!enable)
 		sst->ops->power(sst->dev, false);
@@ -984,9 +976,8 @@ static int sst_set_be_modules(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
 	dev_dbg(c->dev, "Enter: widget=%s\n", w->name);
 
 	if (SND_SOC_DAPM_EVENT_ON(event)) {
-		mutex_lock(&drv->lock);
-		ret = sst_send_slot_map(drv);
-		mutex_unlock(&drv->lock);
+		scoped_guard(mutex, &drv->lock)
+			ret = sst_send_slot_map(drv);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 		ret = sst_send_pipe_module_params(w, k);
@@ -1344,9 +1335,8 @@ int sst_send_pipe_gains(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int stream, int mute)
 
 				dev_dbg(dai->dev, "send gains for widget=%s\n",
 						p->sink->name);
-				mutex_lock(&drv->lock);
-				sst_set_pipe_gain(ids, drv, mute);
-				mutex_unlock(&drv->lock);
+				scoped_guard(mutex, &drv->lock)
+					sst_set_pipe_gain(ids, drv, mute);
 			}
 		}
 	} else {
@@ -1360,9 +1350,8 @@ int sst_send_pipe_gains(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int stream, int mute)
 
 				dev_dbg(dai->dev, "send gain for widget=%s\n",
 						p->source->name);
-				mutex_lock(&drv->lock);
-				sst_set_pipe_gain(ids, drv, mute);
-				mutex_unlock(&drv->lock);
+				scoped_guard(mutex, &drv->lock)
+					sst_set_pipe_gain(ids, drv, mute);
 			}
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-11 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-11 11:58 [PATCH 00/20] ASoC: Intel: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 01/20] ASoC: Intel: catpt: ipc: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 18:44   ` Cezary Rojewski
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 02/20] ASoC: Intel: catpt: dsp: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 18:39   ` Cezary Rojewski
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 03/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: utils: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 04/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: probes: Use guard() for spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 19:34   ` Cezary Rojewski
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 05/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: pcm: Use guard() for mutex & " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 06/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: path: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 07/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: loader: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 08/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: ipc: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 09/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: icl: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 10/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: debugfs: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 11/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: debug: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 12/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: core: Use guard() for mutex & " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 13/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: control: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 14/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: apl: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 15/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst_stream: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 16/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst_pvt: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 17/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` phucduc.bui [this message]
2026-06-11 11:59 ` [PATCH 19/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst-mfld-platform-pcm: Use guard() for mutex & " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:59 ` [PATCH 20/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst_ipc: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 19:04 ` [PATCH 00/20] ASoC: Intel: Use guard() for mutex & " Cezary Rojewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260611115901.80438-19-phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
    --to=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    --cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox