The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
To: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>,
	Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
	Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
	Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
Cc: v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] 9p/trans_virtio: reject mount tags longer than NAME_MAX at probe
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2026 17:10:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260627211012.4042372-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260626111906.801890-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com>

p9_virtio_probe() reads a 16-bit mount tag length (tag_len) from the
device config and kzalloc()s tag_len + 1 bytes for chan->tag with no
upper bound. A malicious or compromised host can present a tag of up to
65535 bytes; that tag is later copied into the single-page sysfs buffer
by p9_mount_tag_show() (memcpy(buf, chan->tag, tag_len + 1)), a
host-controlled out-of-bounds write of up to ~64 KiB past the PAGE_SIZE
attribute buffer.

Reject an overlong tag at probe time. A 9p mount tag is a name-like
identifier, so bound it by NAME_MAX (255): that limit is independent of
the sysfs/seq_file page size and is far above any legitimate mount tag,
which keeps p9_mount_tag_show() safe at the root without hard-coding a
seq_file implementation detail.

Fixes: 179a5bc4b8cb ("net/9p: use memcpy() instead of snprintf() in p9_mount_tag_show()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
Signed-off-by: Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
---
v4: bound tag_len by NAME_MAX (255) instead of PAGE_SIZE, per Christian
    Schoenebeck's review of v3 -- a 9p mount tag is a name-like identifier, and
    NAME_MAX avoids hard-coding the seq_file page-size implementation detail
    (which could change and silently break the bound) and resolves the
    off-by-one he noted.
v3: reject at probe time (PAGE_SIZE) instead of truncating in show().
v2: sysfs_emit() in show() -- dropped; probe-time rejection preferred.
v1: bound the show() copy.

Build-tested ARCH=um (net/9p/trans_virtio.o, W=1, clean; NAME_MAX resolves with
no new include). The original ~64 KiB OOB write was reproduced pre-fix; with the
probe bound a tag_len > 255 device is refused, so the show handler never sees an
out-of-page tag.

 net/9p/trans_virtio.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/9p/trans_virtio.c b/net/9p/trans_virtio.c
index b0d0094ec8e2c..9fa63e3ebf673 100644
--- a/net/9p/trans_virtio.c
+++ b/net/9p/trans_virtio.c
@@ -633,6 +633,11 @@ static int p9_virtio_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 		err = -EINVAL;
 		goto out_free_vq;
 	}
+	if (tag_len > NAME_MAX) {
+		dev_err(&vdev->dev, "mount tag too long (%u bytes)\n", tag_len);
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto out_free_vq;
+	}
 	tag = kzalloc(tag_len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!tag) {
 		err = -ENOMEM;

base-commit: 4edcdefd4083ae04b1a5656f4be6cd83ae919ef4
-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-27 21:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-10 11:42 [PATCH] 9p/trans_virtio: bound mount_tag show copy to one page Michael Bommarito
2026-06-10 15:46 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2026-06-10 16:00   ` Michael Bommarito
2026-06-26 11:19 ` [PATCH v3] 9p/trans_virtio: reject mount tags that cannot fit a sysfs page Michael Bommarito
2026-06-26 12:34   ` Christian Schoenebeck
2026-06-27 21:10   ` Michael Bommarito [this message]
2026-07-03 15:14     ` [PATCH v4] 9p/trans_virtio: reject mount tags longer than NAME_MAX at probe Christian Schoenebeck
2026-06-29 11:57   ` [PATCH v3] 9p/trans_virtio: reject mount tags that cannot fit a sysfs page kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260627211012.4042372-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com \
    --to=michael.bommarito@gmail.com \
    --cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
    --cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
    --cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
    --cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox