From: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
Cc: v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] 9p/trans_virtio: reject mount tags longer than NAME_MAX at probe
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2026 17:14:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4770766.cEBGB3zze1@weasel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260627211012.4042372-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
On Saturday, 27 June 2026 23:10:12 CEST Michael Bommarito wrote:
> p9_virtio_probe() reads a 16-bit mount tag length (tag_len) from the
> device config and kzalloc()s tag_len + 1 bytes for chan->tag with no
> upper bound. A malicious or compromised host can present a tag of up to
> 65535 bytes; that tag is later copied into the single-page sysfs buffer
> by p9_mount_tag_show() (memcpy(buf, chan->tag, tag_len + 1)), a
> host-controlled out-of-bounds write of up to ~64 KiB past the PAGE_SIZE
> attribute buffer.
>
> Reject an overlong tag at probe time. A 9p mount tag is a name-like
> identifier, so bound it by NAME_MAX (255): that limit is independent of
> the sysfs/seq_file page size and is far above any legitimate mount tag,
> which keeps p9_mount_tag_show() safe at the root without hard-coding a
> seq_file implementation detail.
>
> Fixes: 179a5bc4b8cb ("net/9p: use memcpy() instead of snprintf() in
> p9_mount_tag_show()") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
> Signed-off-by: Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
> ---
> v4: bound tag_len by NAME_MAX (255) instead of PAGE_SIZE, per Christian
> Schoenebeck's review of v3 -- a 9p mount tag is a name-like identifier,
> and NAME_MAX avoids hard-coding the seq_file page-size implementation
> detail (which could change and silently break the bound) and resolves the
> off-by-one he noted.
> v3: reject at probe time (PAGE_SIZE) instead of truncating in show().
> v2: sysfs_emit() in show() -- dropped; probe-time rejection preferred.
> v1: bound the show() copy.
>
> Build-tested ARCH=um (net/9p/trans_virtio.o, W=1, clean; NAME_MAX resolves
> with no new include). The original ~64 KiB OOB write was reproduced
> pre-fix; with the probe bound a tag_len > 255 device is refused, so the
> show handler never sees an out-of-page tag.
>
> net/9p/trans_virtio.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/9p/trans_virtio.c b/net/9p/trans_virtio.c
> index b0d0094ec8e2c..9fa63e3ebf673 100644
> --- a/net/9p/trans_virtio.c
> +++ b/net/9p/trans_virtio.c
> @@ -633,6 +633,11 @@ static int p9_virtio_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> err = -EINVAL;
> goto out_free_vq;
> }
> + if (tag_len > NAME_MAX) {
> + dev_err(&vdev->dev, "mount tag too long (%u bytes)\n", tag_len);
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_free_vq;
> + }
> tag = kzalloc(tag_len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!tag) {
> err = -ENOMEM;
>
> base-commit: 4edcdefd4083ae04b1a5656f4be6cd83ae919ef4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-03 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-10 11:42 [PATCH] 9p/trans_virtio: bound mount_tag show copy to one page Michael Bommarito
2026-06-10 15:46 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2026-06-10 16:00 ` Michael Bommarito
2026-06-26 11:19 ` [PATCH v3] 9p/trans_virtio: reject mount tags that cannot fit a sysfs page Michael Bommarito
2026-06-26 12:34 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2026-06-27 21:10 ` [PATCH v4] 9p/trans_virtio: reject mount tags longer than NAME_MAX at probe Michael Bommarito
2026-07-03 15:14 ` Christian Schoenebeck [this message]
2026-06-29 11:57 ` [PATCH v3] 9p/trans_virtio: reject mount tags that cannot fit a sysfs page kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4770766.cEBGB3zze1@weasel \
--to=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=michael.bommarito@gmail.com \
--cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox