[RESEND RFC PATCH v2 0/5] mm/damon: add mTHP collapse and split actions

[RESEND RFC PATCH v2 0/5] mm/damon: add mTHP collapse and split actions

[Lian Wang]

Resend of v2 with the RFC tag restored (v1 was RFC PATCH, so v2 should
be RFC PATCH v2).

This resend also includes fixes for issues identified during review of
the earlier mis-sent PATCH v2 thread: uninitialized memory, TOCTOU
races, BUILD_BUG guards, missing sysfs action name registration, and
stack allocation overflow.  The series has been re-tested on aarch64
(anonymous and file-backed THP split) and is checkpatch clean.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260618094838.32805-1-lianux.mm@gmail.com/

Changes since v1

 - Rename DAMOS_MTHP_SPLIT -> DAMOS_SPLIT for naming consistency with
   the existing actions (per SJ's review).
 - Drop the per-scheme hot_threshold field.  Hotness policy does not
   belong in the kernel; target selection now lives in user space and
   is expressed to DAMOS via the address filter (per SJ's review).
 - Drop the v1 SPE debugfs patch entirely.  debugfs is not the right
   interface for a feature, and the SPE profiler belongs in user space
   (see "User-space target selection" below).  v2 is kernel mechanism
   only: 5 patches.
 - Decouple T1 (a lab observation) from T2 (the production issue), and
   correct the architecture claim: ptep_test_and_clear_young() skips
   the TLB flush on both x86_64 and arm64, so the blind spot is
   architecture-independent rather than arm64-only.
 - Terminology: avoid "stale TLB".  A valid TLB entry is doing its
   job; the point is only that it lets the CPU satisfy a translation
   without a page-table walk, so the Accessed bit cleared by DAMON is
   not re-set.

Background

Two effects degrade DAMON's PTE-Accessed-bit (AF) signal once THP is
in play.  Both are described here as motivation only; this series does
not change the AF monitoring path.

T2 -- PMD-granularity inflation (production issue)

A 2MB THP is tracked by a single PMD-level Accessed bit.  One access
to any 4KB sub-page sets the AF for the whole 2MB, so DAMON reports
the entire THP as hot and cannot distinguish a genuinely hot 2MB
region from a 2MB region with a single hot 4KB page.  Cold memory
hides inside "hot" THPs, and access-driven pageout/migration becomes
coarse.

This is the workload that drove the work: Sangfor's Kunpeng 920 KVM
hosts running Oracle.  ARM SPE sampling of that workload shows 94.6%
of THPs have fewer than 10% of their sub-pages actually accessed.

T1 -- TLB-reach blind spot (lab observation)

When the working set fits within L2 TLB reach (measured at 2048
entries x 2MB = 4GB on Kunpeng 920; no public data available), the
CPU satisfies translations entirely from the TLB,
preventing translation table walks.  Because
ptep_test_and_clear_young() does not flush
the TLB, valid TLB entries continue to satisfy translations and the
AF that DAMON cleared is never re-set, so DAMON sees nr_accesses=0 for
memory that is in fact hot, and no scheme triggers.  This reproduces
in the lab with small workloads; it is not something we have seen
reported from production, where working sets exceed TLB reach.

What this series adds

Rather than change AF monitoring, this series adds two order-aware
DAMOS actions so a policy layer can act at mTHP granularity:

 - DAMOS_COLLAPSE + target_order (patches 1-3): collapse small folios
   up to a chosen mTHP order.  Patch 1 adds the target_order field and
   its sysfs file; patch 2 exports a khugepaged helper
   (damon_collapse_folio_range()); patch 3 wires the vaddr handler.

 - DAMOS_SPLIT + target_order (patches 4-5): split large folios down
   to a chosen mTHP order via split_folio_to_order(), for both
   anonymous and file-backed (tmpfs/shmem) folios.

The two are complementary, not competing:

   THP=never  + DAMOS_COLLAPSE: start at 4KB, grow hot regions up.
   THP=always + DAMOS_SPLIT:    start at 2MB, shrink cold regions down.

This dual-path design aligns with ideas discussed with Asier
Gutierrez; we plan to unify our mTHP automation and evaluation
roadmaps under this standard DAMOS_SPLIT action.

A deployment can pick either baseline, or run both, and let DAMOS
manage the placement.  THP is still wanted for the hot working set
(fewer TLB misses, shallower walks); the goal is not "no THP" but
"THP where it is hot, small pages where it is cold."

User-space target selection

The decision of *which* regions to collapse or split is left to user
space and fed to DAMOS through the existing DAMOS address filter
(DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_ADDR) -- the interface suggested during v1 review.
The kernel provides the mechanism; user space provides the policy,
consistent with the perf/BPF "kernel samples, user space decides"
model and with the DAMON-X direction.

Because the AF signal is unreliable at PMD granularity (T1/T2), the
scheme is run with min_nr_accesses=0 so it does not gate on access
count, and the address filter selects targets.  min_nr_accesses=0 is
also what unblocks the T1 case, where nr_accesses is pinned at 0.

Why not just turn khugepaged off?  You can, but khugepaged is global
and usually left enabled because other workloads rely on it; it cannot
be disabled per region.  DAMOS_COLLAPSE gives per-region,
access-pattern-driven collapse -- a more precise, targeted complement
to khugepaged's global scan, not a replacement for it.  To handle the
runtime race where khugepaged might aggressively re-collapse what
DAMOS_SPLIT just split, we are evaluating a precise VMA-level handshake
or back-off mechanism to prevent ping-pong effects in mixed
environments.

Two user-space data sources produce the candidate address ranges:

 1. ARM SPE (ARMv8.2+): perf record (SPE) -> per-2MB hot-fraction
    histogram -> PA->VA via /proc/<pid>/pagemap -> sparse-THP VA
    ranges.  SPE reads physical addresses from the CPU pipeline,
    bypassing the TLB and page tables, so it is immune to T1 and T2.

 2. smaps fallback (no SPE): scan /proc/<pid>/smaps for THP-backed
    VMAs and treat the 2MB-aligned ranges as split candidates.

The SPE profiler stays in user space deliberately: the SPE PMU is a
single-consumer resource, so a kernel consumer would lock out
user-space perf and tooling (x86 PEBS / AMD IBS have the same
property).  Keeping it in user space avoids that and keeps the metric
source pluggable, in line with DAMON-X.  This is why v2 drops the v1
SPE debugfs patch.

Testing

Tested on aarch64 with this series applied to 7.1.0-rc5, THP=always,
using a DAMOS_SPLIT scheme (target_order=2, min_nr_accesses=0) and a
single DAMOS address filter selecting one 2MB-aligned range:

 - Anonymous THP: the filter splits exactly that one THP --
   sz_applied=2MB and AnonHugePages drops by 2MB, the rest of the
   256MB mapping untouched.
 - File-backed THP (tmpfs/shmem mounted huge=always): the same setup
   splits exactly one 2MB shmem THP -- sz_applied=2MB and
   ShmemPmdMapped drops by 2MB.  This confirms split_folio_to_order()
   works for shmem folios (the KVM-guest-on-THP-tmpfs case).
 - The address filter is what bounds the action: sz_tried covers the
   whole ~2GB monitored region while sz_applied is exactly the 2MB the
   filter selected.
 - A smaps-based path (for hosts without SPE) enumerates THP-backed
   ranges and splits all THP in the target workload.
 - checkpatch clean on all 5 patches.

Test scripts and SPE-to-DAMON pipeline tools:
https://github.com/lianux-mm/damon_spe/tree/v2

Lian Wang (5):
  mm/damon: add target_order field for DAMOS_COLLAPSE
  mm/khugepaged: add damon_collapse_folio_range() for external callers
  mm/damon/vaddr: implement mTHP-aware DAMOS_COLLAPSE handler
  mm/damon: introduce DAMOS_SPLIT action
  mm/damon/vaddr: implement DAMOS_SPLIT handler

 include/linux/damon.h      |  10 +++
 include/linux/khugepaged.h |   9 +++
 mm/damon/core.c            |   2 +
 mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c   |  77 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/damon/vaddr.c           | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/khugepaged.c            |  46 +++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 272 insertions(+)

--
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)

Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 0/5] mm/damon: add mTHP collapse and split actions

[Lorenzo Stoakes]

+cc all those you missed.

I really need to write a bot to do this, because I'm getting a little tired of
pointing this out :))

On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 05:46:28PM +0800, Lian Wang wrote:
>  include/linux/damon.h      |  10 +++
>  include/linux/khugepaged.h |   9 +++
>  mm/damon/core.c            |   2 +
>  mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c   |  77 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/damon/vaddr.c           | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/khugepaged.c            |  46 +++++++++++++
>  6 files changed, 272 insertions(+)

You are doing damon changes, and that belongs to SJ, sure.

But you're also changing core THP code? Please ensure you cc- THP people because
without our approval this cannot be merged:

$ scripts/get_maintainer.pl 20260702094633.75658-1-lianux.mm@gmail.com.mbx
SJ Park <sj@kernel.org> (maintainer:DAMON)
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> (maintainer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org> (maintainer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org> (maintainer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
damon@lists.linux.dev (open list:DAMON)
linux-mm@kvack.org (open list:DAMON)
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)

>
> --
> 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
>

Thanks, Lorenzo

Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 0/5] mm/damon: add mTHP collapse and split actions

[SJ Park]

On Thu,  2 Jul 2026 17:52:22 +0800 Lian Wang <lianux.mm@gmail.com> wrote:

> Resend of v2 with the RFC tag restored (v1 was RFC PATCH, so v2 should
> be RFC PATCH v2).

Somehow you sent this twice.  Maybe your email setup issue?  You also replied
same message twice to my previous comment.  Anyway, I will review the later
posted one: https://lore.kernel.org/20260702094633.75658-1-lianux.mm@gmail.com


Thanks,
SJ

[...]

Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 0/5] mm/damon: add mTHP collapse and split actions

[SJ Park]

On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 11:23:55 +0100 Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org> wrote:

> +cc all those you missed.

Thank you for doing this, Lorenzo.

> 
> I really need to write a bot to do this, because I'm getting a little tired of
> pointing this out :))

Good idea.  I will also consider implementing this kind of checks to to my lzy
tool box [1] or hkml [2].

> 
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 05:46:28PM +0800, Lian Wang wrote:
> >  include/linux/damon.h      |  10 +++
> >  include/linux/khugepaged.h |   9 +++
> >  mm/damon/core.c            |   2 +
> >  mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c   |  77 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  mm/damon/vaddr.c           | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  mm/khugepaged.c            |  46 +++++++++++++
> >  6 files changed, 272 insertions(+)
> 
> You are doing damon changes, and that belongs to SJ, sure.
> 
> But you're also changing core THP code? Please ensure you cc- THP people because
> without our approval this cannot be merged:

Thank you for calling out this, Lorenzo.

Lian, please do as Lorenzo kindly asked, from the next revision.  You don't
need to add those recipients to all the patches if you worry their inbox
volumes.  But do ensure adding them to at least patches that modifies
khugepaged.h and khugepaged.c, and the cover letter.

If it is cumbersome, consider using 'hkml patch format' [3].  It does that (run
get_maintainer.pl and add recipients to each patch and the coverletter) for its
users.

[1] https://github.com/sjp38/lazybox
[2] https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail
[3] https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail/blob/master/USAGE.md#formatting-patches


Thanks,
SJ

[...]

Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 0/5] mm/damon: add mTHP collapse and split actions

[wang lian]

Hi Lorenzo,

> On Jul 2, 2026, at 18:23, Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> +cc all those you missed.
> 
> I really need to write a bot to do this, because I'm getting a little tired of
> pointing this out :))
> 
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 05:46:28PM +0800, Lian Wang wrote:
>> include/linux/damon.h      |  10 +++
>> include/linux/khugepaged.h |   9 +++
>> mm/damon/core.c            |   2 +
>> mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c   |  77 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> mm/damon/vaddr.c           | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> mm/khugepaged.c            |  46 +++++++++++++
>> 6 files changed, 272 insertions(+)
> 
> You are doing damon changes, and that belongs to SJ, sure.
> 
> But you're also changing core THP code? Please ensure you cc- THP people because
> without our approval this cannot be merged:
> 
> $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl 20260702094633.75658-1-lianux.mm@gmail.com.mbx
> SJ Park <sj@kernel.org> (maintainer:DAMON)
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> (maintainer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org> (maintainer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org> (maintainer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> "Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> damon@lists.linux.dev (open list:DAMON)
> linux-mm@kvack.org (open list:DAMON)
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
> 
>> 
>> --
>> 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
>> 
> 
Thank you for pointing this out again, and I deeply appreciate
all the tedious work you do as a maintainer to keep the mailing
lists aligned.

As a newcomer trying to transition into complex feature
development, I must admit my initial design is far from perfect.
I leveraged AI tools to assist with certain implementation
paths, and although I extensively self-reviewed, tested, and
reasoned through every single line of code, your and SJ's
feedback clearly shows there are still major architectural
flaws.  Just like my very first kernel patch -- which was
strictly reviewed and guided by you and David H. -- I know that
your sharp feedback is exactly what will help me grow as a
kernel engineer.

I will completely step back and radically rethink the design of
this series, especially regarding the cross-subsystem
encapsulation and locking hazards.

As for that bot you mentioned getting tired of running manually
-- let me write it for you.  An imperfect newcomer who just made
these exact mistakes knows precisely where the traps are.  I can
craft a pre-flight patch check script or a CI bot that
automatically validates the get_maintainer.pl output against the
patch file diffstat before any email is dispatched, throwing a
loud warning if core MM files are touched but their respective
maintainers are missing from the CC line.

What do you think?  I would love to build this tool to save your
and other maintainers' valuable time in the future.

Thanks again for steering me in the right direction!

Best regards,
Wang Lian
> Thanks, Lorenzo

Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 0/5] mm/damon: add mTHP collapse and split actions

[SJ Park]

On Fri, 3 Jul 2026 09:10:51 +0800 wang lian <lianux.mm@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,Lorenzo
> 
> > On Jul 2, 2026, at 18:23, Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > +cc all those you missed.
> > 
> > I really need to write a bot to do this, because I'm getting a little tired of
> > pointing this out :))
> > 
> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 05:46:28PM +0800, Lian Wang wrote:
> >> include/linux/damon.h      |  10 +++
> >> include/linux/khugepaged.h |   9 +++
> >> mm/damon/core.c            |   2 +
> >> mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c   |  77 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> mm/damon/vaddr.c           | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> mm/khugepaged.c            |  46 +++++++++++++
> >> 6 files changed, 272 insertions(+)
> > 
> > You are doing damon changes, and that belongs to SJ, sure.
> > 
> > But you're also changing core THP code? Please ensure you cc- THP people because
> > without our approval this cannot be merged:
> > 
> > $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl 20260702094633.75658-1-lianux.mm@gmail.com.mbx <mailto:20260702094633.75658-1-lianux.mm@gmail.com.mbx>
> > SJ Park <sj@kernel.org <mailto:sj@kernel.org>> (maintainer:DAMON)
> > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org <mailto:akpm@linux-foundation.org>> (maintainer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> > David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org <mailto:david@kernel.org>> (maintainer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> > Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org <mailto:ljs@kernel.org>> (maintainer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> > Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com <mailto:ziy@nvidia.com>> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> > Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com <mailto:baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> > "Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org <mailto:liam@infradead.org>> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> > Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com <mailto:npache@redhat.com>> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> > Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com <mailto:ryan.roberts@arm.com>> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> > Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com <mailto:dev.jain@arm.com>> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> > Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org <mailto:baohua@kernel.org>> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> > Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev <mailto:lance.yang@linux.dev>> (reviewer:MEMORY MANAGEMENT - THP (TRANSPARENT HUGE PAGE))
> > damon@lists.linux.dev <mailto:damon@lists.linux.dev> (open list:DAMON)
> > linux-mm@kvack.org <mailto:linux-mm@kvack.org> (open list:DAMON)
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <mailto:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> (open list)
> > 
> >> 
> >> --
> >> 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
> >> 
> > 
> 
> Thank you for pointing this out again, and I deeply appreciate all the tedious 
> work you do as a maintainer to keep the mailing lists aligned. 
> 
> As a newcomer trying to transition into complex feature development, I must 
> admit my initial design is far from perfect. I leveraged AI tools to assist 
> with certain implementation paths, and although I extensively self-reviewed, 
> tested, and reasoned through every single line of code, your and SJ's 
> feedback clearly shows there are still major architectural flaws. Just like my 
> very first kernel patch—which was strictly reviewed and guided by you and David H. 
> —I know that your sharp feedback is exactly what will help me grow as a kernel engineer.
> 
> I will completely step back and radically rethink the design of this series, 
> especially regarding the cross-subsystem encapsulation and locking hazards. 

No worries, take your time :)

> 
> As for that bot you mentioned getting tired of running manually—let me write 
> it for you. An imperfect newcomer who just made these exact mistakes knows 
> precisely where the traps are. I can craft a pre-flight patch check script or 
> a CI bot that automatically validates the `get_maintainer.pl` output against 
> the patch file diffstat before any email is dispatched, throwing a loud warning 
> if core MM files are touched but their respective maintainers are missing from 
> the CC line. 
> 
> What do you think? I would love to build this tool to save your and other 
> maintainers' valuable time in the future.

Sounds great!  hkml already has all building blocks for doing the check, so I'm
planning to develop such checks in hkml, but only for manual runs.  I ain't
develop and run a bot, since I don't have that much compute resource.  Maybe
you could save your time by reusing the hkml feature on your bot.


Thanks,
SJ

[...]

Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 0/5] mm/damon: add mTHP collapse and split actions

[SJ Park]

On Thu,  2 Jul 2026 09:52:34 -0700 SJ Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 11:23:55 +0100 Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > +cc all those you missed.
> 
> Thank you for doing this, Lorenzo.
> 
> > 
> > I really need to write a bot to do this, because I'm getting a little tired of
> > pointing this out :))
> 
> Good idea.  I will also consider implementing this kind of checks to to my lzy
> tool box [1] or hkml [2].

I implemented [1] the check logic on hkml.  Many things to fix and improve in
future, but seems working at least for this series.  You can use it like below:

    $ hkml patch check --check_recipients only ./0002-mm-khugepaged-add-damon-collapse-folio-range-for-external-callers.patch
    MISSING RECIPIENTS for [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 2/5] mm/khugepaged: add damon_collapse_folio_range() for external callers
    - Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    - David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
    - Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>
    - Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
    - Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
    - "Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>
    - Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
    - Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
    - Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
    - Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
    - Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
    - Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
    - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
    $ hkml patch check --check_recipients only ./0003-mm-damon-vaddr-implement-mthp-aware-damos-collapse-handler.patch
    MISSING RECIPIENTS for [RESEND RFC PATCH v2 3/5] mm/damon/vaddr: implement mTHP-aware DAMOS_COLLAPSE handler
    - Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

It is also integrated with the interactive mails list [2], so that you can run
it without manually downloading the patch files.

FWIW, 'hkml patch format' automatically adds recipients based on
get_maintainer.pl, so this check is unnecessary for hkml users.  But this will
help me reviewing patches that not formatted with hkml or other similar
scripts.

hkml has a feature [3] to monitor new mails.  Extending it to run this new
check and send mails for check failures could be one of the ways to implement
the bot.  I'm not planning to do that by myself, though.  I will run the check
only for patches that look interesting to me, for now.

[1] https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail/commit/9ca6fa1f71edc7a219edeb41d4c7f91
[2] https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail/blob/master/USAGE.md#interactive-viewer
[3] https://github.com/sjp38/hackermail/blob/master/USAGE.md#monitoring-mails


Thanks,
SJ

[...]