From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Adam Litke" <agl@us.ibm.com>,
"Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] virtio_balloon: prime stats vq after virtio_device_ready()
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 08:59:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706070936-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24336f56-1024-4c9b-8653-b1a4658b627c@kernel.org>
On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 10:57:33AM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 7/6/26 10:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 10:38:18AM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Yes.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Why not?
> >>
> >> I was wondering whether the spec would state something about that.
> >
> > Sorry I do not get the question. Virtio API expects
> > callers to serialize calls for each VQ. So this just prevents the work
> > from running and accessing the VQ while probe calls add_buf/kick.
> > I'll add a comment explaining that.
> > But it has nothing to do with the spec.
>
> The device is clearly not properly initialized yet.
>
> Yet, we expect that we get a stats_request() callback that would try to
> queue_work(). And IIUC, the stats_request() will be directly issued by the device.
With an in-spec device, it can happen right after virtio_device_ready.
We could defer it a bit, but I don't see what this gets us, and
this also protects against any out of spec ones.
> In QEMU, that would mean that balloon_stats_poll_cb() runs, which would do a
>
> if (s->stats_vq_elem == NULL) {
> ...
> return
> }
>
> virtqueue_push(s->svq, s->stats_vq_elem, 0);
> virtio_notify(vdev, s->svq);
>
>
> That's why I'm confused :)
First the spec says there could be interrupts for no reasons right after
DRIVER_OK. Second there are situations in which qemu might
consume a buffer without a kick and then an interrupt
races with the kick.
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-05 19:12 [PATCH v2] virtio_balloon: prime stats vq after virtio_device_ready() Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-07-06 7:28 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-06 8:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-07-06 8:38 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-06 8:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-07-06 8:57 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-06 12:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2026-07-06 13:42 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260706070936-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox