From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Adam Litke" <agl@us.ibm.com>,
"Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] virtio_balloon: prime stats vq after virtio_device_ready()
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 04:43:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706044122-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6b8e4ad3-6909-4d0a-89a4-104a5ad9fe79@kernel.org>
On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 10:38:18AM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> >>> - virtqueue_kick(vb->stats_vq);
> >>> + disable_work(&vb->update_balloon_stats_work);
> >>
> >> That's to stop the stats queue triggering stats_request() I assume?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> >> Is that
> >> valid before we actually added+kicked ourselves?
> >
> > Why not?
>
> I was wondering whether the spec would state something about that.
Sorry I do not get the question. Virtio API expects
callers to serialize calls for each VQ. So this just prevents the work
from running and accessing the VQ while probe calls add_buf/kick.
I'll add a comment explaining that.
But it has nothing to do with the spec.
> >
> >> Also, can't we simply handle that in stats_request(), just ignoring it there?
> >
> > Then we'd need to maintain a special flag and I dislike that.
>
> I was hoping that we could use the device-ready indication, but there would be a
> small race window indeed.
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-05 19:12 [PATCH v2] virtio_balloon: prime stats vq after virtio_device_ready() Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-07-06 7:28 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-06 8:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-07-06 8:38 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-06 8:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2026-07-06 8:57 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-06 12:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-07-06 13:42 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260706044122-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox