From: "Jeremy Erazo (Devel Group)" <mendozayt13@gmail.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
Claudia Draghicescu <claudia.rosu@nxp.com>,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] Bluetooth: ISO: backport missed OOB write fix to 6.6.y and 6.1.y
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 22:05:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260707220526.271712-1-mendozayt13@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260702144207.320421-1-mendozayt13@gmail.com>
From: Jeremy Erazo <mendozayt13@gmail.com>
Hi Greg, Sasha, Luiz,
v2 respin. Two things fixed vs v1:
* The 40-char upstream SHA I put in the "commit <sha> upstream." line
of both patches was garbage. The 12-char prefix f4da3ee15de9 was
correct but I hand-expanded the tail wrong, so `git cat-file` on it
fails. Corrected to f4da3ee15de9944482382181329bb6d7335ca003.
Thanks Sasha for catching that.
* The v1 patches were asymmetric: 6.6.y accidentally carried the
put_user() hunk in iso_sock_getsockopt() that 6.1.y omitted. There
was no reason for that split; my mistake in v1. v2 drops the
put_user hunk from 6.6.y so both branches now carry identical
mechanics against their own net/bluetooth/iso.c (add #include
"eir.h", add EIR_BAA_SERVICE_UUID define, replace the memcpy() with
the eir_get_service_data() + bounds-check pattern). The put_user()
correction is a separate getsockopt correctness fix; if that hunk
is wanted in stable it should travel as its own patch.
Everything else in v1 still stands: root cause, affected branch matrix,
reachability, build verification. Re-stated below for the archive.
Root cause: upstream commit f4da3ee15de9944482382181329bb6d7335ca003
("Bluetooth: ISO: Copy BASE if service data matches EIR_BAA_SERVICE_UUID",
2023-09-28, mainline v6.7) addressed the OOB write in iso_connect_ind()
but landed without a Fixes: tag, so the stable autoselect bot never
picked it up. linux-6.6.y (v6.6.143) and linux-6.1.y (v6.1.176) both
still ship the pre-fix code where ev3->length, a __u8 in [0, 255],
drives memcpy() directly into iso_pi(sk)->base[248]. Values in
[249, 255] overflow 1 to 7 bytes into adjacent fields of struct
iso_pinfo, including the low bytes of iso_pi(sk)->conn. FORTIFY_SOURCE
flags the write but does not block it.
Affected branch matrix (as of today, 2026-07-07):
* linux-6.6.y (v6.6.143) vulnerable - patch 1/2
* linux-6.1.y (v6.1.176) vulnerable - patch 2/2
* linux-5.15.y NOT affected - iso_connect_ind PA-report
handling was introduced by
commit 9c0826310bfb in v6.5,
after 5.15.y branched.
Both patches carry the same three hunks against their own iso.c:
* add #include "eir.h"
* add #define EIR_BAA_SERVICE_UUID 0x1851
* replace the unbounded memcpy() with the upstream pattern
(eir_get_service_data() + base_len <= sizeof(iso_pi(sk)->base) guard)
Reachability of the underlying bug: any host with an ISO listening
socket bound as a broadcast sink (LE Audio / Auracast use case). No
pairing required, single HCI_EV_LE_PER_ADV_REPORT event within BLE
radio range.
Build verification: net/bluetooth/iso.o builds cleanly in both trees
with BT + BT_LE + BT_HCIVHCI enabled on x86_64 defconfig. No new
checkpatch errors; two warnings reported are "unknown commit id"
(shallow clone) and one long line in the backport-note paragraph.
I did not include a reproducer or PoC in this series because the fix
is the one Luiz/Claudia already landed upstream and there is no dispute
about the OOB write. A userspace reproducer against /dev/vhci exists
locally and is available on request if the maintainers want to confirm
on their side.
Changes in v2:
* Fix incorrect 40-char upstream SHA in the "upstream." line of both
patches (thanks Sasha).
* Drop the getsockopt put_user() hunk from 6.6.y so both patches are
symmetric.
Jeremy Erazo (2):
Bluetooth: ISO: Copy BASE if service data matches EIR_BAA_SERVICE_UUID
Bluetooth: ISO: Copy BASE if service data matches EIR_BAA_SERVICE_UUID
net/bluetooth/iso.c | 15 +++++++++++----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-07 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 14:42 [PATCH 0/2] Bluetooth: ISO: backport missed OOB write fix to 6.6.y and 6.1.y Jeremy Erazo
2026-07-02 14:42 ` [PATCH 1/2 6.6.y] Bluetooth: ISO: Copy BASE if service data matches EIR_BAA_SERVICE_UUID Jeremy Erazo
2026-07-02 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/2 6.1.y] " Jeremy Erazo
2026-07-04 2:04 ` [PATCH 0/2] Bluetooth: ISO: backport missed OOB write fix to 6.6.y and 6.1.y Sasha Levin
2026-07-07 22:05 ` Jeremy Erazo (Devel Group) [this message]
2026-07-07 22:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/2 6.6.y] Bluetooth: ISO: Copy BASE if service data matches EIR_BAA_SERVICE_UUID Jeremy Erazo (Devel Group)
2026-07-08 8:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-07-07 22:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/2 6.1.y] " Jeremy Erazo (Devel Group)
2026-07-09 1:04 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Bluetooth: ISO: backport missed OOB write fix to 6.6.y and 6.1.y Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260707220526.271712-1-mendozayt13@gmail.com \
--to=mendozayt13@gmail.com \
--cc=claudia.rosu@nxp.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luiz.von.dentz@intel.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox