From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Jeremy Erazo (Devel Group)" <mendozayt13@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
Claudia Draghicescu <claudia.rosu@nxp.com>,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2 6.6.y] Bluetooth: ISO: Copy BASE if service data matches EIR_BAA_SERVICE_UUID
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 10:46:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026070801-reconcile-matchbook-eef9@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707220526.271712-2-mendozayt13@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 10:05:25PM +0000, Jeremy Erazo (Devel Group) wrote:
> From: Jeremy Erazo <mendozayt13@gmail.com>
>
> commit f4da3ee15de9944482382181329bb6d7335ca003 upstream.
>
> Copy the content of a Periodic Advertisement Report to BASE only if
> the service UUID is Basic Audio Announcement Service UUID.
>
> [Stable backport rationale]
>
> This fix landed in mainline v6.7 without a Fixes: tag, so the stable
> autoselect bot never picked it up. linux-6.6.y HEAD (v6.6.143) still
> carries the pre-fix code at net/bluetooth/iso.c:1935:
>
> if (sk) {
> memcpy(iso_pi(sk)->base, ev3->data, ev3->length);
> iso_pi(sk)->base_len = ev3->length;
> }
>
> ev3->length is __u8 and iso_pi(sk)->base is __u8[BASE_MAX_LENGTH] where
> BASE_MAX_LENGTH is HCI_MAX_PER_AD_LENGTH(252) - EIR_SERVICE_DATA_LENGTH(4)
> = 248. When an attacker within BLE radio range sends an HCI_EV_LE_PER_ADV_REPORT
> with ev3->length in [249, 255], the memcpy writes 1 to 7 bytes past the
> buffer into the trailing fields of struct iso_pinfo, including the low
> bytes of the iso_pi(sk)->conn pointer. FORTIFY_SOURCE flags the write
> with "memcpy: detected field-spanning write" but does not block it.
>
> The upstream refactor addresses this by:
> 1. Filtering via eir_get_service_data() so only the BASE portion of
> the PA payload is copied.
> 2. Bounding the copy with base_len <= sizeof(iso_pi(sk)->base).
>
> Backport notes for 6.6.y:
> * eir_get_service_data() is already declared in net/bluetooth/eir.h.
> * The header include for eir.h and the EIR_BAA_SERVICE_UUID define
> are added here, matching the upstream commit.
> * The put_user() addition in iso_sock_getsockopt() that was part of
> the same upstream commit is not included; that hunk is a separate
> getsockopt correctness fix and is not required for the OOB write
> fix (getsockopt(BT_ISO_BASE) is a controlled path that already
> validates optlen against sizeof(iso_pi(sk)->base)). Applying the
> getsockopt hunk here would risk a user-visible ABI change on a
> stable branch.
>
> Reachability: any host with an ISO listening socket bound as a
> broadcast sink (LE Audio / Auracast). No pairing required.
>
> Fixes: 9c0826310bfb ("Bluetooth: ISO: Add support for periodic adv reports processing")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6.y
> Signed-off-by: Claudia Draghicescu <claudia.rosu@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
> [jerazo: backport to 6.6.y; add #include "eir.h" and EIR_BAA_SERVICE_UUID define; drop unrelated getsockopt hunk]
But eir.h was included in the original commit, you added it in a
different place from the original, why? Please try to keep changes as
close to upstream as possible when backporting.
Please fix this up and resend.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 14:42 [PATCH 0/2] Bluetooth: ISO: backport missed OOB write fix to 6.6.y and 6.1.y Jeremy Erazo
2026-07-02 14:42 ` [PATCH 1/2 6.6.y] Bluetooth: ISO: Copy BASE if service data matches EIR_BAA_SERVICE_UUID Jeremy Erazo
2026-07-02 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/2 6.1.y] " Jeremy Erazo
2026-07-04 2:04 ` [PATCH 0/2] Bluetooth: ISO: backport missed OOB write fix to 6.6.y and 6.1.y Sasha Levin
2026-07-07 22:05 ` [PATCH v2 " Jeremy Erazo (Devel Group)
2026-07-07 22:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/2 6.6.y] Bluetooth: ISO: Copy BASE if service data matches EIR_BAA_SERVICE_UUID Jeremy Erazo (Devel Group)
2026-07-08 8:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-07-07 22:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/2 6.1.y] " Jeremy Erazo (Devel Group)
2026-07-09 1:04 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Bluetooth: ISO: backport missed OOB write fix to 6.6.y and 6.1.y Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026070801-reconcile-matchbook-eef9@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=claudia.rosu@nxp.com \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luiz.von.dentz@intel.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=mendozayt13@gmail.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox