* [PATCH] x86/bugs: Don't use cpu-type matching in cpu_vuln_blacklist
@ 2026-07-08 18:40 Pawan Gupta
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Pawan Gupta @ 2026-07-08 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, x86,
H. Peter Anvin
Cc: linux-kernel
Thomas Gleixner pointed out that cpu-type is a per-CPU property while
hybrid is a system property, conflating the two in the CPU matching
infrastructure is wrong. Currently, on a hybrid system x86_match_cpu()
matches any cpu-type. This works if the intent is to find the possibility
of a cpu-type in a system. But fails if matching for the cpu-type of a
given CPU.
Borislav posted a cleanup here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260703193222.GFakgORjvxwnZTPRnI@fat_crate.local
To make way for the cleanup stop matching cpu-type in cpu_vuln_blacklist.
RFDS is the only user, so drop the VULNBL_INTEL_TYPE entries and fold their
RFDS bit into the base Alder Lake (0x97) and Raptor Lake (0xB7) blacklist
entries. For now open-code cpu-type check in vulnerable_to_rfds(). In
future, if more vulnerabilities need cpu-type matching a helper can be
added.
No functional change intended.
Fixes: 722fa0dba74f ("x86/rfds: Exclude P-only parts from the RFDS affected list")
Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index a3df21d26460..b38126199a5b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1251,9 +1251,6 @@ static const __initconst struct x86_cpu_id cpu_vuln_whitelist[] = {
#define VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(vfm, max_stepping, issues) \
X86_MATCH_VFM_STEPS(vfm, X86_STEP_MIN, max_stepping, issues)
-#define VULNBL_INTEL_TYPE(vfm, cpu_type, issues) \
- X86_MATCH_VFM_CPU_TYPE(vfm, INTEL_CPU_TYPE_##cpu_type, issues)
-
#define VULNBL_AMD(family, blacklist) \
VULNBL(AMD, family, X86_MODEL_ANY, blacklist)
@@ -1316,11 +1313,9 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id cpu_vuln_blacklist[] __initconst = {
VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_TIGERLAKE, X86_STEP_MAX, GDS | ITS | ITS_NATIVE_ONLY),
VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_LAKEFIELD, X86_STEP_MAX, MMIO | MMIO_SBDS | RETBLEED),
VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_ROCKETLAKE, X86_STEP_MAX, MMIO | RETBLEED | GDS | ITS | ITS_NATIVE_ONLY),
- VULNBL_INTEL_TYPE(INTEL_ALDERLAKE, ATOM, RFDS | VMSCAPE),
- VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_ALDERLAKE, X86_STEP_MAX, VMSCAPE),
+ VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_ALDERLAKE, X86_STEP_MAX, RFDS | VMSCAPE),
VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_ALDERLAKE_L, X86_STEP_MAX, RFDS | VMSCAPE),
- VULNBL_INTEL_TYPE(INTEL_RAPTORLAKE, ATOM, RFDS | VMSCAPE),
- VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_RAPTORLAKE, X86_STEP_MAX, VMSCAPE),
+ VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_RAPTORLAKE, X86_STEP_MAX, RFDS | VMSCAPE),
VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_RAPTORLAKE_P, X86_STEP_MAX, RFDS | VMSCAPE),
VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_RAPTORLAKE_S, X86_STEP_MAX, RFDS | VMSCAPE),
VULNBL_INTEL_STEPS(INTEL_METEORLAKE_L, X86_STEP_MAX, VMSCAPE),
@@ -1388,7 +1383,21 @@ static bool __init vulnerable_to_rfds(u64 x86_arch_cap_msr)
return true;
/* Only consult the blacklist when there is no enumeration: */
- return cpu_matches(cpu_vuln_blacklist, RFDS);
+ if (!cpu_matches(cpu_vuln_blacklist, RFDS))
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * ADL and RPL are affected only if they have Atom CPUs. Hybrids have
+ * both Core and Atom CPUs. Mark unaffected when Atom CPUs are not
+ * present.
+ */
+ if ((boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 0x97 ||
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 0xB7) &&
+ boot_cpu_data.topo.intel_type != INTEL_CPU_TYPE_ATOM &&
+ !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYBRID_CPU))
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
}
static bool __init vulnerable_to_its(u64 x86_arch_cap_msr)
---
base-commit: 8cdeaa50eae8dad34885515f62559ee83e7e8dda
change-id: 20260708-cpu-type-vuln-14ded7fc0d47
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-07-08 18:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-08 18:40 [PATCH] x86/bugs: Don't use cpu-type matching in cpu_vuln_blacklist Pawan Gupta
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox