From: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>,
Prodyut Hazarika <phazarika@appliedmicro.com>,
Mark Miesfeld <mmiesfeld@appliedmicro.com>,
Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@amcc.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCHv3 4/5] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: fix infinite loop in NCQ tag completion bit-scanning
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 19:32:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709023202.2132165-5-rosenp@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709023202.2132165-1-rosenp@gmail.com>
The hand-rolled bit-scanning loop in the NCQ completion path has an
infinite loop bug. When tag_mask has only high bits set (e.g.
0x80000000), the inner while loop left-shifts tag_mask until it
overflows to 0. At that point !(0 & 1) is always true and 0 <<= 1
stays 0, causing an infinite loop in hardirq context with a spinlock
held.
Replace the open-coded bit-scanning with __ffs() which correctly
finds the least significant set bit and is bounded by the width of
the argument.
Fixes: 62936009f35a ("[libata] Add 460EX on-chip SATA driver, sata_dwc_460ex")
Assisted-by: opencode:big-pickle
Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
---
drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c b/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
index 097b060a9ee6..08d40e287bac 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
@@ -607,14 +607,9 @@ static irqreturn_t sata_dwc_isr(int irq, void *dev_instance)
status = ap->ops->sff_check_status(ap);
dev_dbg(ap->dev, "%s ATA status register=0x%x\n", __func__, status);
- tag = 0;
while (tag_mask) {
- while (!(tag_mask & 0x00000001)) {
- tag++;
- tag_mask <<= 1;
- }
-
- tag_mask &= (~0x00000001);
+ tag = __ffs(tag_mask);
+ tag_mask &= ~(1U << tag);
qc = ata_qc_from_tag(ap, tag);
if (unlikely(!qc)) {
dev_err(ap->dev, "failed to get qc");
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 2:31 [PATCHv3 0/5] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: cleanups and interrupt ordering fix Rosen Penev
2026-07-09 2:31 ` [PATCHv3 1/5] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: use platform_get_irq() Rosen Penev
2026-07-09 2:31 ` [PATCHv3 2/5] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: enable SATA interrupts only after IRQ handler is registered Rosen Penev
2026-07-09 2:32 ` [PATCHv3 3/5] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: fix clear_interrupt_bit() clearing all pending interrupts Rosen Penev
2026-07-09 2:32 ` Rosen Penev [this message]
2026-07-09 2:32 ` [PATCHv3 5/5] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: disable SATA interrupts on device removal Rosen Penev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709023202.2132165-5-rosenp@gmail.com \
--to=rosenp@gmail.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmiesfeld@appliedmicro.com \
--cc=phazarika@appliedmicro.com \
--cc=rsarmah@amcc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox