From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypt: Avoid dynamic allocation in fscrypt_get_devices()
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 10:45:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720174558.GC1865@quark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260719055602.78828-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
On Sat, Jul 18, 2026 at 10:56:02PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> When a blk_crypto_key starts being used or is evicted, fs/crypto/ calls
> fscrypt_get_devices() to get the filesystem's list of block devices,
> then iterates over them and calls blk_crypto_config_supported(),
> blk_crypto_start_using_key(), or blk_crypto_evict_key() on each one.
>
> Currently, the block device pointers are placed in a dynamically
> allocated array. This dynamic allocation is problematic because:
>
> - It can fail, especially at the fscrypt_destroy_inline_crypt_key() call
> site when it's invoked for inode eviction under direct reclaim.
>
> - fscrypt_destroy_inline_crypt_key() doesn't handle the failure. It
> just zeroizes and frees the blk_crypto_key without calling
> blk_crypto_evict_key(). That causes a use-after-free.
>
> For now, let's fix this in the straightforward and easily-backportable
> way by switching to an on-stack array. Currently the fscrypt
> multi-device functionality is used only by f2fs, which has a hardcoded
> limit of 8 block devices. An on-stack array works fine for that.
>
> (Of course, this solution won't scale up to large number of block
> devices. For that we'd need a different solution, like moving the block
> device iteration into the filesystem. Or in the case of btrfs, which
> will only support blk-crypto-fallback, we should make it just call
> blk-crypto-fallback directly, so the block devices won't be needed.)
>
> Fixes: 22e9947a4b2b ("fscrypt: stop holding extra request_queue references")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
> ---
Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fscrypt/linux.git/log/?h=for-current
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-19 5:56 [PATCH] fscrypt: Avoid dynamic allocation in fscrypt_get_devices() Eric Biggers
2026-07-20 9:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-20 17:45 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720174558.GC1865@quark \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox