From: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/7] s390/vfio_ccw: ensure index for read/write regions are within range
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 22:19:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720201931.976660-6-farman@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720201931.976660-1-farman@linux.ibm.com>
The introduction of the capability chain rightly clamped the
region indexes to the range of the capabilities itself, but
neglected to do so for the existing read/write regions which
should also be enforced.
Fixes: db8e5d17ac03 ("vfio-ccw: add capabilities chain")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
index 45ec722d25ea..e695cd985369 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
@@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ static ssize_t vfio_ccw_mdev_read(struct vfio_device *vdev,
return vfio_ccw_mdev_read_io_region(private, buf, count, ppos);
default:
index -= VFIO_CCW_NUM_REGIONS;
+ index = array_index_nospec(index, private->num_regions);
return private->region[index].ops->read(private, buf, count,
ppos);
}
@@ -295,6 +296,7 @@ static ssize_t vfio_ccw_mdev_write(struct vfio_device *vdev,
return vfio_ccw_mdev_write_io_region(private, buf, count, ppos);
default:
index -= VFIO_CCW_NUM_REGIONS;
+ index = array_index_nospec(index, private->num_regions);
return private->region[index].ops->write(private, buf, count,
ppos);
}
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 20:19 [PATCH v2 0/7] s390/vfio_ccw fixes Eric Farman
2026-07-20 20:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] s390/vfio_ccw: free all memory if cp_init() fails Eric Farman
2026-07-20 21:48 ` Farhan Ali
2026-07-21 0:01 ` Eric Farman
2026-07-20 20:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] s390/vfio_ccw: limit the number of channel program segments Eric Farman
2026-07-20 20:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] s390/vfio_ccw: fix out of bounds check on CCW array Eric Farman
2026-07-20 20:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] s390/vfio_ccw: ensure first IDAW remains constant Eric Farman
2026-07-20 20:19 ` Eric Farman [this message]
2026-07-20 20:19 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] s390/vfio_ccw: implement a channel program lock Eric Farman
2026-07-20 20:19 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] s390/vfio_ccw: implement a crw lock Eric Farman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720201931.976660-6-farman@linux.ibm.com \
--to=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox