From: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/7] s390/vfio_ccw: implement a channel program lock
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 22:19:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720201931.976660-7-farman@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720201931.976660-1-farman@linux.ibm.com>
The channel_program struct is manipulated without a serialization
mechanism to ensure consistent behavior. Take a broad stroke of
putting the entire structure behind a spin lock, which can be
acquired with or without the mutex guarding the I/O regions that
feed into the population of the channel program.
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h | 1 +
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 6 +++++-
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c | 8 +++++++-
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h | 2 ++
5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
index c6f0264fb5d3..7bfb3a952817 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
@@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ int cp_init(struct channel_program *cp, union orb *orb)
* @cp, which must have been returned by a previous call to cp_init().
* Otherwise, undefined behavior occurs.
*/
-void cp_free(struct channel_program *cp)
+void cp_free_locked(struct channel_program *cp)
{
struct vfio_device *vdev =
&container_of(cp, struct vfio_ccw_private, cp)->vdev;
@@ -810,6 +810,17 @@ void cp_free(struct channel_program *cp)
}
}
+void cp_free(struct channel_program *cp)
+{
+ struct vfio_ccw_private *private =
+ container_of(cp, struct vfio_ccw_private, cp);
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&private->cp_lock, flags);
+ cp_free_locked(cp);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&private->cp_lock, flags);
+}
+
/**
* cp_prefetch() - translate a guest physical address channel program to
* a real-device runnable channel program.
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h
index d547dbc969cc..edfb47a292ca 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.h
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct channel_program {
};
int cp_init(struct channel_program *cp, union orb *orb);
+void cp_free_locked(struct channel_program *cp);
void cp_free(struct channel_program *cp);
int cp_prefetch(struct channel_program *cp);
union orb *cp_get_orb(struct channel_program *cp, struct subchannel *sch);
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
index 1a095085bc72..bfb68de6e52c 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ void vfio_ccw_sch_io_todo(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct vfio_ccw_private *private;
struct irb *irb;
+ unsigned long flags;
bool is_final;
bool cp_is_finished = false;
@@ -91,13 +92,16 @@ void vfio_ccw_sch_io_todo(struct work_struct *work)
is_final = !(scsw_actl(&irb->scsw) &
(SCSW_ACTL_DEVACT | SCSW_ACTL_SCHACT));
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&private->cp_lock, flags);
if (scsw_is_solicited(&irb->scsw)) {
cp_update_scsw(&private->cp, &irb->scsw);
if (is_final && private->state == VFIO_CCW_STATE_CP_PENDING) {
- cp_free(&private->cp);
+ cp_free_locked(&private->cp);
cp_is_finished = true;
}
}
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&private->cp_lock, flags);
+
mutex_lock(&private->io_mutex);
memcpy(private->io_region->irb_area, irb, sizeof(*irb));
mutex_unlock(&private->io_mutex);
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
index e695cd985369..d2475b3158cf 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
@@ -36,10 +36,15 @@ static void vfio_ccw_dma_unmap(struct vfio_device *vdev, u64 iova, u64 length)
{
struct vfio_ccw_private *private =
container_of(vdev, struct vfio_ccw_private, vdev);
+ unsigned long flags;
/* Drivers MUST unpin pages in response to an invalidation. */
- if (!cp_iova_pinned(&private->cp, iova, length))
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&private->cp_lock, flags);
+ if (!cp_iova_pinned(&private->cp, iova, length)) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&private->cp_lock, flags);
return;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&private->cp_lock, flags);
vfio_ccw_mdev_reset(private);
}
@@ -54,6 +59,7 @@ static int vfio_ccw_mdev_init_dev(struct vfio_device *vdev)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&private->crw);
INIT_WORK(&private->io_work, vfio_ccw_sch_io_todo);
INIT_WORK(&private->crw_work, vfio_ccw_crw_todo);
+ spin_lock_init(&private->cp_lock);
private->cp.guest_cp = kzalloc_objs(struct ccw1, CCWCHAIN_LEN_MAX);
if (!private->cp.guest_cp)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
index 0501d4bbcdbd..061b594fde36 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
@@ -115,7 +115,9 @@ struct vfio_ccw_private {
struct ccw_crw_region *crw_region;
int num_regions;
+ spinlock_t cp_lock;
struct channel_program cp;
+
struct irb irb;
union scsw scsw;
struct list_head crw;
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 20:19 [PATCH v2 0/7] s390/vfio_ccw fixes Eric Farman
2026-07-20 20:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] s390/vfio_ccw: free all memory if cp_init() fails Eric Farman
2026-07-20 21:48 ` Farhan Ali
2026-07-21 0:01 ` Eric Farman
2026-07-20 20:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] s390/vfio_ccw: limit the number of channel program segments Eric Farman
2026-07-20 20:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] s390/vfio_ccw: fix out of bounds check on CCW array Eric Farman
2026-07-20 20:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] s390/vfio_ccw: ensure first IDAW remains constant Eric Farman
2026-07-20 20:19 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] s390/vfio_ccw: ensure index for read/write regions are within range Eric Farman
2026-07-20 20:19 ` Eric Farman [this message]
2026-07-20 20:19 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] s390/vfio_ccw: implement a crw lock Eric Farman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720201931.976660-7-farman@linux.ibm.com \
--to=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox