From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>,
Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: turn off DAX on new files when encryption is set
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 19:43:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260727194350.GC1021387@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <kekum3d7vakufwz75guyr5mzn6w4rujmssyom5qynpbxucbqpf@f4va7cswqspx>
On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 09:06:23PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 23-07-26 14:26:48, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> > Currently, when setting the S_ENCRYPTED flag on a new regular inode in
> > a -o dax=always mounted FS, we seem to be erroneously retaining the S_DAX
> > flag. This is because the newly created inode ends up with the following:
> >
> > __ext4_new_inode()
> > ext4_set_inode_flags(init=true) // sets S_DAX
> > fscrypt_set_context()
> > ext4_set_context()
> > ext4_set_inode_flags(init=false) // sets S_ENCRYPTED but
> > doesn't clears S_DAX
> > ext4_set_aops
> > inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &ext4_dax_aops;
> >
> > Due to the S_DAX flag, the excrypted inode gets ext4_dax_aops and it
> > silently ends up bypassing encryption completely. This is reflected in
> > multiple xfstests failures like generic/548. To fix this, ensure we disable
> > S_DAX correctly when S_ENCRYPTED is being set on a newly created inode. It
> > is safe to change DAX state there because ext4_set_aops() later can
> > correctly detect S_DAX unset and assign the correct aops.
> >
> > The fix was actually the intended behavior however it seemed to have
> > silently changed in 043546e46dc7.
> >
> > Fixes: 043546e46dc7 ("fs/ext4: Only change S_DAX on inode load")
> > Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > fs/ext4/crypto.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> > fs/ext4/inode.c | 10 ++++++----
> > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/crypto.c b/fs/ext4/crypto.c
> > index f41f320f4437..2d409114e02e 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/crypto.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/crypto.c
> > @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ static int ext4_set_context(struct inode *inode, const void *ctx, size_t len,
> > {
> > handle_t *handle = fs_data;
> > int res, res2, credits, retries = 0;
> > + bool init = S_ISREG(inode->i_mode);
>
> Hum, I have some comments: IMHO the change is confusing because the meaning
> of 'init' argument of ext4_set_inode_flags() doesn't mean the first setting
> of flags any longer. And the reliance on ext4_set_context() getting called
> in a safe place exactly for regular files is rather subtle as well.
>
> Also does the change to ext4_set_inode_flags() really work? As far as I'm
> reading the ext4 crypto implementation, I don't see where we'd be setting
> EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT for inodes with already enabled encryption (where we
> load the context from xattrs through ext4_get_context()) and thus DAX would
> still get enabled for such inodes? What am I missing?
Maybe __ext4_new_inode() should set the encryption flag on the inode
earlier? Currently it decides whether the inode will be encrypted, then
calls ext4_set_inode_flags(), then calls fscrypt_set_context() (and thus
ext4_set_context()). That last step sets the flag and calls
ext4_set_inode_flags() *again*.
I don't remember if there's a reason for that redundancy, but it might
just be for historical reasons. ext4_set_context() is called in two
different cases: when a new inode is created and it's encrypted from the
beginning, and when FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY is executed on an empty
directory. The latter does have to set the encrypt flag there.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-27 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 8:56 [PATCH] ext4: turn off DAX on new files when encryption is set Ojaswin Mujoo
2026-07-27 11:59 ` Disha Goel
2026-07-27 19:01 ` Eric Biggers
2026-07-27 19:06 ` Jan Kara
2026-07-27 19:43 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2026-07-27 20:13 ` Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260727194350.GC1021387@google.com \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=disgoel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox