From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>,
Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: turn off DAX on new files when encryption is set
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 20:13:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260727201339.GD1021387@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727194350.GC1021387@google.com>
On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 07:43:50PM +0000, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 09:06:23PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Thu 23-07-26 14:26:48, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> > > Currently, when setting the S_ENCRYPTED flag on a new regular inode in
> > > a -o dax=always mounted FS, we seem to be erroneously retaining the S_DAX
> > > flag. This is because the newly created inode ends up with the following:
> > >
> > > __ext4_new_inode()
> > > ext4_set_inode_flags(init=true) // sets S_DAX
> > > fscrypt_set_context()
> > > ext4_set_context()
> > > ext4_set_inode_flags(init=false) // sets S_ENCRYPTED but
> > > doesn't clears S_DAX
> > > ext4_set_aops
> > > inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &ext4_dax_aops;
> > >
> > > Due to the S_DAX flag, the excrypted inode gets ext4_dax_aops and it
> > > silently ends up bypassing encryption completely. This is reflected in
> > > multiple xfstests failures like generic/548. To fix this, ensure we disable
> > > S_DAX correctly when S_ENCRYPTED is being set on a newly created inode. It
> > > is safe to change DAX state there because ext4_set_aops() later can
> > > correctly detect S_DAX unset and assign the correct aops.
> > >
> > > The fix was actually the intended behavior however it seemed to have
> > > silently changed in 043546e46dc7.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 043546e46dc7 ("fs/ext4: Only change S_DAX on inode load")
> > > Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
> > > ---
> > > fs/ext4/crypto.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> > > fs/ext4/inode.c | 10 ++++++----
> > > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/crypto.c b/fs/ext4/crypto.c
> > > index f41f320f4437..2d409114e02e 100644
> > > --- a/fs/ext4/crypto.c
> > > +++ b/fs/ext4/crypto.c
> > > @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ static int ext4_set_context(struct inode *inode, const void *ctx, size_t len,
> > > {
> > > handle_t *handle = fs_data;
> > > int res, res2, credits, retries = 0;
> > > + bool init = S_ISREG(inode->i_mode);
> >
> > Hum, I have some comments: IMHO the change is confusing because the meaning
> > of 'init' argument of ext4_set_inode_flags() doesn't mean the first setting
> > of flags any longer. And the reliance on ext4_set_context() getting called
> > in a safe place exactly for regular files is rather subtle as well.
> >
> > Also does the change to ext4_set_inode_flags() really work? As far as I'm
> > reading the ext4 crypto implementation, I don't see where we'd be setting
> > EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT for inodes with already enabled encryption (where we
> > load the context from xattrs through ext4_get_context()) and thus DAX would
> > still get enabled for such inodes? What am I missing?
>
> Maybe __ext4_new_inode() should set the encryption flag on the inode
> earlier? Currently it decides whether the inode will be encrypted, then
> calls ext4_set_inode_flags(), then calls fscrypt_set_context() (and thus
> ext4_set_context()). That last step sets the flag and calls
> ext4_set_inode_flags() *again*.
>
> I don't remember if there's a reason for that redundancy, but it might
> just be for historical reasons. ext4_set_context() is called in two
> different cases: when a new inode is created and it's encrypted from the
> beginning, and when FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY is executed on an empty
> directory. The latter does have to set the encrypt flag there.
>
> - Eric
Here's an idea. I haven't tested it though.
Note that this would align ext4 closer with f2fs, which already sets the
encrypt flag before it calls fscrypt_set_context().
diff --git a/fs/ext4/crypto.c b/fs/ext4/crypto.c
index f41f320f4437..c4bfe18fd527 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/crypto.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/crypto.c
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int ext4_set_context(struct inode *inode, const void *ctx, size_t len,
if (inode->i_ino == EXT4_ROOT_INO)
return -EPERM;
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_DAX(inode) && i_size_read(inode)))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_DAX(inode)))
return -EINVAL;
if (ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_DAX))
@@ -163,6 +163,14 @@ static int ext4_set_context(struct inode *inode, const void *ctx, size_t len,
*/
if (handle) {
+ /*
+ * ext4 should have set the encrypt flag on the inode already,
+ * and it should not have enabled inline data.
+ */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ENCRYPTED(inode)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA)))
+ return -EINVAL;
/*
* Since the inode is new it is ok to pass the
* XATTR_CREATE flag. This is necessary to match the
@@ -170,21 +178,10 @@ static int ext4_set_context(struct inode *inode, const void *ctx, size_t len,
* function with the credits allocated for the new
* inode.
*/
- res = ext4_xattr_set_handle(handle, inode,
- EXT4_XATTR_INDEX_ENCRYPTION,
- EXT4_XATTR_NAME_ENCRYPTION_CONTEXT,
- ctx, len, XATTR_CREATE);
- if (!res) {
- ext4_set_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_ENCRYPT);
- ext4_clear_inode_state(inode,
- EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA);
- /*
- * Update inode->i_flags - S_ENCRYPTED will be enabled,
- * S_DAX may be disabled
- */
- ext4_set_inode_flags(inode, false);
- }
- return res;
+ return ext4_xattr_set_handle(handle, inode,
+ EXT4_XATTR_INDEX_ENCRYPTION,
+ EXT4_XATTR_NAME_ENCRYPTION_CONTEXT,
+ ctx, len, XATTR_CREATE);
}
res = dquot_initialize(inode);
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
index a40cb27f8116..3848244af77a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
@@ -997,6 +997,8 @@ struct inode *__ext4_new_inode(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
err = fscrypt_prepare_new_inode(dir, inode, &encrypt);
if (err)
goto out;
+ if (encrypt)
+ i_flags |= EXT4_ENCRYPT_FL;
}
err = dquot_initialize(inode);
@@ -1306,6 +1308,7 @@ struct inode *__ext4_new_inode(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
ei->i_extra_isize = sbi->s_want_extra_isize;
ei->i_inline_off = 0;
if (ext4_has_feature_inline_data(sb) &&
+ !(ei->i_flags & EXT4_ENCRYPT_FL) &&
(!(ei->i_flags & (EXT4_DAX_FL|EXT4_EA_INODE_FL)) || S_ISDIR(mode)))
ext4_set_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_MAY_INLINE_DATA);
ret = inode;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-27 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 8:56 [PATCH] ext4: turn off DAX on new files when encryption is set Ojaswin Mujoo
2026-07-27 11:59 ` Disha Goel
2026-07-27 19:01 ` Eric Biggers
2026-07-27 19:06 ` Jan Kara
2026-07-27 19:43 ` Eric Biggers
2026-07-27 20:13 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260727201339.GD1021387@google.com \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=disgoel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox