From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@broadcom.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhargava.marreddy@broadcom.com,
rahul-rg.gupta@broadcom.com, vsrama-krishna.nemani@broadcom.com,
rajashekar.hudumula@broadcom.com, dharmender.garg@broadcom.com,
ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] bnge: add more functionality
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:16:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260730141655.2c326b2a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHLZf_tb5+JmoP9=LyKDwnmsSTzefC7py0U6HN17hGYqvU8jpA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 11:26:17 +0530 Vikas Gupta wrote:
> > And the concern about IRQs being in use on shutdown perhaps.
>
> Since the IRQ issue stems from the new shared bng_re RoCE driver, and
> it lacks a bng_re_shutdown
> implementation to free the IRQs, should we implement this in the
> current series, especially given that the bng_re driver
> implementation is currently minimal?
Doesn't look like the other patches will conflict, maybe I'm missing
something. If there's no conflict perhaps you could take patch 1 out
of this series and post a combined patch series for bng and _re
scoped to the parts that need to change in both trees.
And we can pull that series into both networking and RDMA?
Note that you can post multiple series at once, as long as they don't
conflict and the sum(patches) <= 15.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-24 14:29 [PATCH net-next 0/4] bnge: add more functionality Vikas Gupta
2026-07-24 14:29 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] bnge: add steps in bnge_shutdown() Vikas Gupta
2026-07-29 2:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-07-24 14:29 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] bnge: refactor rx mode helpers to accept explicit address lists Vikas Gupta
2026-07-29 2:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-07-29 2:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-07-24 14:29 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] bnge: add ndo_set_rx_mode_async support Vikas Gupta
2026-07-29 2:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-07-24 14:29 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] bnge: send hwrm for interface down/up transitions Vikas Gupta
2026-07-29 2:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-07-29 2:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-07-29 23:33 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] bnge: add more functionality Jakub Kicinski
2026-07-30 5:56 ` Vikas Gupta
2026-07-30 21:16 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260730141655.2c326b2a@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bhargava.marreddy@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dharmender.garg@broadcom.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rahul-rg.gupta@broadcom.com \
--cc=rajashekar.hudumula@broadcom.com \
--cc=vikas.gupta@broadcom.com \
--cc=vsrama-krishna.nemani@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox