The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
	"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	"Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
	"Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>,
	"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/24] irq & spin_lock: Add counted interrupt disabling/enabling
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 12:43:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260803104321.GL49529@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260803092910.GD49951@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 11:29:10AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 01:30:06PM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > +++ b/include/linux/interrupt_rc.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +/*
> > + * include/linux/interrupt_rc.h - refcounted local processor interrupt
> > + * management.
> > + *
> > + * Since the implementation of this API currently depends on
> > + * local_irq_save()/local_irq_restore(), we split this into it's own header to
> > + * make it easier to include without hitting circular header dependencies.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef __LINUX_INTERRUPT_RC_H
> > +#define __LINUX_INTERRUPT_RC_H
> > +
> > +#include <linux/irqflags.h>
> > +#include <asm/processor.h>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > +#include <asm/smp.h>
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +/* Per-cpu interrupt disabling state for local_interrupt_{disable,enable}() */
> > +struct interrupt_disable_state {
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +};
> > +
> > +DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct interrupt_disable_state, local_interrupt_disable_state);
> 
> I'm a bit confused by the need for this struct; afaict there aren't any
> additional members in the rest of the series. So at this point this is
> pointless wrappery, no?
> 
> Having this variable exported is unfortunate.

One option to get rid of that EXPORT would be something like so I
suppose.

---
--- a/include/linux/interrupt_rc.h
+++ b/include/linux/interrupt_rc.h
@@ -12,21 +12,52 @@
 #define __LINUX_INTERRUPT_RC_H
 
 #include <linux/irqflags.h>
+#include <linux/preempt.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 #include <asm/smp.h>
 #endif
 
+#ifndef MODULE
 /* Per-cpu interrupt disabling state for local_interrupt_{disable,enable}() */
-struct interrupt_disable_state {
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, local_interrupt_disable_state);
+
+static __always_inline void __local_interrupt_disable(void)
+{
 	unsigned long flags;
-};
 
-DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct interrupt_disable_state, local_interrupt_disable_state);
+	local_irq_save(flags);
+	raw_cpu_write(local_interrupt_disable_state, flags);
+}
+
+static __always_inline void __local_interrupt_enable(void)
+{
+	unsigned long flags = raw_cpu_read(local_interrupt_disable_state);
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+
+#ifndef INSTANTIATE_EXPORTED_INTERRUPT_DISABLE
+static __always_inline void _local_interrupt_disable(void)
+{
+	__local_interrupt_disable();
+}
+
+static __always_inline void _local_interrupt_enable(void)
+{
+	__local_interrupt_enable();
+}
+#else
+extern void _local_interrupt_disable(void);
+extern void _local_interrupt_enable(void);
+#endif
+
+#else /* !MODULE */
+extern void _local_interrupt_disable(void);
+extern void _local_interrupt_enable(void);
+#endif /* !MODULE */
 
 static inline void local_interrupt_disable(void)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned long new_count;
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi());
@@ -35,10 +66,8 @@ static inline void local_interrupt_disab
 
 	/* Interrupts can happen here, but it's OK, see __irq_exit_rcu(). */
 
-	if ((new_count & HARDIRQ_DISABLE_MASK) == HARDIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET) {
-		local_irq_save(flags);
-		raw_cpu_write(local_interrupt_disable_state.flags, flags);
-	}
+	if ((new_count & HARDIRQ_DISABLE_MASK) == HARDIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET)
+		_local_interrupt_disable();
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPTION
@@ -63,14 +92,8 @@ static inline void local_interrupt_enabl
 
 	new_count = hardirq_disable_exit();
 
-	if ((new_count & HARDIRQ_DISABLE_MASK) == 0) {
-		unsigned long flags;
-
-		flags = raw_cpu_read(local_interrupt_disable_state.flags);
-		local_irq_restore(flags);
-
-		local_interrupt_enable_reched(new_count);
-	}
+	if ((new_count & HARDIRQ_DISABLE_MASK) == 0)
+		_local_interrupt_enable();
 }
 
 #endif /* !__LINUX_INTERRUPT_RC_H */
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 
 #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
 
+#define INSTANTIATE_EXPORTED_INTERRUPT_DISABLE
 #include <linux/export.h>
 #include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
@@ -88,8 +89,17 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(hardirqs_enabl
 EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(hardirq_context);
 #endif
 
-DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct interrupt_disable_state, local_interrupt_disable_state);
-EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(local_interrupt_disable_state);
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, local_interrupt_disable_state);
+
+void _local_interrupt_disable(void)
+{
+	__local_interrupt_disable();
+}
+
+void _local_interrupt_enable(void)
+{
+	__local_interrupt_enable();
+}
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS
 /*

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-03 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-31 20:30 [GIT PULL] [PATCH 00/24] Rust synchronization changes for v7.3 Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 01/24] preempt: Track NMI nesting to separate per-CPU counter Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 02/24] preempt: Introduce HARDIRQ_DISABLE_BITS Boqun Feng
2026-08-03  9:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 03/24] preempt: Introduce __preempt_count_{sub, add}_return() Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 04/24] openrisc: Include <linux/cpumask.h> in smp.h Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 05/24] irq & spin_lock: Add counted interrupt disabling/enabling Boqun Feng
2026-08-03  9:19   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-03 13:33     ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-03  9:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-03 10:43     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-08-04  4:41       ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-04  7:26         ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-04  7:33           ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-04 12:50             ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 12:52           ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-03 10:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-03 10:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-03 14:06     ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-03 14:21       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-03 14:33         ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-03 14:34           ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-03 14:39         ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-03 15:06           ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-03 19:09   ` Ingo Molnar
2026-08-03 19:47     ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-03 20:40       ` Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 06/24] irq: Add KUnit test for refcounted interrupt enable/disable Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 07/24] locking: Switch to _irq_{disable,enable}() variants in cleanup guards Boqun Feng
2026-08-03  9:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-03 13:46     ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-03 13:55       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-03 14:09         ` Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 08/24] sched: Remove the unused preempt_offset parameter of __cant_sleep() Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 09/24] sched: Avoid signed comparison of preempt_count() in __cant_migrate() Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 10/24] preempt: Introduce HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS Boqun Feng
2026-08-03 11:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-03 15:04     ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-03 15:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-03 15:55         ` Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 11/24] arm64: sched/preempt: Enable HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 12/24] s390/preempt: " Boqun Feng
2026-08-03 11:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-03 12:42     ` Heiko Carstens
2026-08-03 17:15       ` Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 13/24] irq: Optimize reschedule check in local_interrupt_enable() Boqun Feng
2026-08-03 11:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-03 17:09     ` Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 14/24] rust: Introduce interrupt module Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 15/24] rust: helper: Add spin_{un,}lock_irq_{enable,disable}() helpers Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 16/24] rust: sync: use super::* in spinlock.rs Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 17/24] rust: sync: Add SpinLockIrq Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 18/24] rust: sync: Introduce SpinLockIrq::lock_with() and friends Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 19/24] rust: sync: Add abstraction for synchronize_rcu() Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 20/24] rust: revocable: Use safe synchronize_rcu() abstraction Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 21/24] rust: sync: Use safe synchronize_rcu() abstraction in poll Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 22/24] rust: sync: Add helpers for mb, dma_mb and friends Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 23/24] rust: sync: Add generic memory barriers Boqun Feng
2026-07-31 20:30 ` [PATCH 24/24] rust: revocable: Use LKMM atomics instead of Rust atomics Boqun Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260803104321.GL49529@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox