* [PATCH 1/3] staging: rtl8723bs: remove redundant ternary operators from return
@ 2026-08-03 19:39 Ashmit Kumar
2026-08-04 7:18 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ashmit Kumar @ 2026-08-03 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh; +Cc: linux-staging, linux-kernel, Ashmit Kumar
The Linux kernel coding style specifies that boolean expressions
do not need a redundant `? true : false` ternary operator.
Additionally, return is not a function and therefore parentheses
are not required.
Signed-off-by: Ashmit Kumar <work.ashmitkumar@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/osdep_service.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/osdep_service.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/osdep_service.c
index 4cfdf7c6234..214c1fd9b3e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/osdep_service.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/osdep_service.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ void rtw_buf_update(u8 **buf, u32 *buf_len, u8 *src, u32 src_len)
*/
inline bool rtw_cbuf_full(struct rtw_cbuf *cbuf)
{
- return (cbuf->write == cbuf->read - 1) ? true : false;
+ return cbuf->write == cbuf->read - 1;
}
/**
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ inline bool rtw_cbuf_full(struct rtw_cbuf *cbuf)
*/
inline bool rtw_cbuf_empty(struct rtw_cbuf *cbuf)
{
- return (cbuf->write == cbuf->read) ? true : false;
+ return cbuf->write == cbuf->read;
}
/**
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] staging: rtl8723bs: remove redundant ternary operators from return
2026-08-03 19:39 [PATCH 1/3] staging: rtl8723bs: remove redundant ternary operators from return Ashmit Kumar
@ 2026-08-04 7:18 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2026-08-04 7:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ashmit Kumar; +Cc: linux-staging, linux-kernel
On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 07:39:22PM +0000, Ashmit Kumar wrote:
> The Linux kernel coding style specifies that boolean expressions
> do not need a redundant `? true : false` ternary operator.
> Additionally, return is not a function and therefore parentheses
> are not required.
Why is this mixed with the media patches? And they didn't seem to be
threaded, how was this sent?
And it's a resend?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-04 7:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-03 19:39 [PATCH 1/3] staging: rtl8723bs: remove redundant ternary operators from return Ashmit Kumar
2026-08-04 7:18 ` Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox