* [PATCH] locking/lockdep: make chain-hlocks average depth configurable
@ 2026-08-03 21:50 Muhammad Bilal
2026-08-04 2:32 ` Zhan Xusheng
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Muhammad Bilal @ 2026-08-03 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: peterz, mingo, will, boqun; +Cc: longman, akpm, linux-kernel, Muhammad Bilal
The static chain_hlocks[] pool is sized as:
MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS = MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS * AVG_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_DEPTH
MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS is already tunable via CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS,
but AVG_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_DEPTH is hardcoded to 5 and has no Kconfig knob.
Workloads that build unusually deep individual lock chains -- rather
than simply a large number of distinct chains -- can exhaust
chain_hlocks[] and trip:
BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low!
well before MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS itself is anywhere near full, which
silently disables lock debugging for the rest of the boot
(debug_locks_off_graph_unlock()). Bumping LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS alone
does not help in that case since the bottleneck is chain depth, not
chain count.
Observed on a PREEMPT_DYNAMIC + RCU lockdep + KASAN debug build,
reproducing at every boot from add_chain_cache() failing to allocate
out of the static pool, hit from sched wakeup, hrtimer, and btrfs
flush-workqueue paths (deep IRQ/softirq nesting stacked on top of
deep filesystem/scheduler call chains).
Add CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_DEPTH so this can be tuned like
LOCKDEP_BITS/LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS, defaulting to 5 to preserve current
behavior for everyone who isn't hitting this.
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal <meatuni001@gmail.com>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h | 2 +-
lib/Kconfig.debug | 17 +++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h
index 0e5e6ffe91a3..ed566681f3c8 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_internals.h
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ enum {
#define MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS (1UL << MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS)
-#define AVG_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_DEPTH 5
+#define AVG_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_DEPTH CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_DEPTH
#define MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS (MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS * AVG_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_DEPTH)
extern struct lock_chain lock_chains[];
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 1244dcac2294..90b7f990611d 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1614,6 +1614,23 @@ config LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS
help
Try increasing this value if you hit "BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS too low!" message.
+config LOCKDEP_CHAIN_DEPTH
+ int "Average depth for MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS"
+ depends on LOCKDEP
+ range 3 20
+ default 5
+ help
+ Average per-chain depth used to size the static chain_hlocks[]
+ pool: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS = MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS *
+ LOCKDEP_CHAIN_DEPTH.
+
+ Workloads that build unusually deep lock chains (heavy irq/softirq
+ nesting stacked on top of deep filesystem or scheduler call chains)
+ can exhaust this pool and trip "BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too
+ low!" well before MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS itself is exhausted, silently
+ disabling lock debugging. Increase this value if you hit that
+ message and LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS increases alone don't help.
+
config LOCKDEP_STACK_TRACE_BITS
int "Size for MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES (as Nth power of 2)"
depends on LOCKDEP && !LOCKDEP_SMALL
--
2.55.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] locking/lockdep: make chain-hlocks average depth configurable
2026-08-03 21:50 [PATCH] locking/lockdep: make chain-hlocks average depth configurable Muhammad Bilal
@ 2026-08-04 2:32 ` Zhan Xusheng
2026-08-04 10:36 ` Muhammad Bilal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zhan Xusheng @ 2026-08-04 2:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: meatuni001, peterz, mingo, will, boqun
Cc: longman, akpm, linux-kernel, zhanxusheng, Zhan Xusheng
From: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 02:50:40AM +0500, Muhammad Bilal wrote:
> + range 3 20
[...]
> + Increase this value if you hit that message and LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS
> + increases alone don't help.
I might be missing something, but doesn't the top of this range interact
with LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS in a way that can fail the build?
MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS is (1 << LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS) * LOCKDEP_CHAIN_DEPTH,
and add_chain_cache() has:
BUILD_BUG_ON((1UL << 24) <= ARRAY_SIZE(chain_hlocks));
since lock_chain.base is a 24-bit index into chain_hlocks[]. So the product
has to stay below 2^24.
LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS ranges up to 21, so with the new knob:
CHAINS_BITS=21, DEPTH=8 -> 2^21 * 8 == 2^24 -> BUILD_BUG_ON fires
i.e. at the maximum CHAINS_BITS anything above DEPTH=7 stops building. Today,
with the fixed depth of 5, 2^21 * 5 stays under the limit, so this is a new
combination the patch makes reachable.
What I find a little awkward is that this is exactly the path the help text
points people at: someone who already raised LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS to 21
chasing the "too low" message and then bumps LOCKDEP_CHAIN_DEPTH as suggested
gets a (fairly opaque) BUILD_BUG_ON rather than a larger pool.
Kconfig can't easily express the (1 << CHAINS_BITS) * DEPTH < 2^24 product,
so would it make sense to at least spell the constraint out in the help text
and note that the build fails otherwise? Capping the range for the worst case
(CHAINS_BITS=21 => DEPTH <= 7) would be safe but would needlessly restrict the
common CHAINS_BITS=16 case, where much larger depths are fine.
Thanks,
Zhan Xusheng
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] locking/lockdep: make chain-hlocks average depth configurable
2026-08-04 2:32 ` Zhan Xusheng
@ 2026-08-04 10:36 ` Muhammad Bilal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Muhammad Bilal @ 2026-08-04 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhan Xusheng
Cc: peterz, mingo, will, boqun, longman, akpm, linux-kernel,
zhanxusheng
Good catch! Just send v2 with fix.
Thanks,
Muhammad Bilal
On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 7:32 AM Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>
>
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 02:50:40AM +0500, Muhammad Bilal wrote:
> > + range 3 20
> [...]
> > + Increase this value if you hit that message and LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS
> > + increases alone don't help.
>
> I might be missing something, but doesn't the top of this range interact
> with LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS in a way that can fail the build?
>
> MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS is (1 << LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS) * LOCKDEP_CHAIN_DEPTH,
> and add_chain_cache() has:
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON((1UL << 24) <= ARRAY_SIZE(chain_hlocks));
>
> since lock_chain.base is a 24-bit index into chain_hlocks[]. So the product
> has to stay below 2^24.
>
> LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS ranges up to 21, so with the new knob:
>
> CHAINS_BITS=21, DEPTH=8 -> 2^21 * 8 == 2^24 -> BUILD_BUG_ON fires
>
> i.e. at the maximum CHAINS_BITS anything above DEPTH=7 stops building. Today,
> with the fixed depth of 5, 2^21 * 5 stays under the limit, so this is a new
> combination the patch makes reachable.
>
> What I find a little awkward is that this is exactly the path the help text
> points people at: someone who already raised LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS to 21
> chasing the "too low" message and then bumps LOCKDEP_CHAIN_DEPTH as suggested
> gets a (fairly opaque) BUILD_BUG_ON rather than a larger pool.
>
> Kconfig can't easily express the (1 << CHAINS_BITS) * DEPTH < 2^24 product,
> so would it make sense to at least spell the constraint out in the help text
> and note that the build fails otherwise? Capping the range for the worst case
> (CHAINS_BITS=21 => DEPTH <= 7) would be safe but would needlessly restrict the
> common CHAINS_BITS=16 case, where much larger depths are fine.
>
> Thanks,
> Zhan Xusheng
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-04 10:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-03 21:50 [PATCH] locking/lockdep: make chain-hlocks average depth configurable Muhammad Bilal
2026-08-04 2:32 ` Zhan Xusheng
2026-08-04 10:36 ` Muhammad Bilal
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox