The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net] net/dibs: Fix UAF of dmb_clientid_arr after dibs_dev_del()
@ 2026-08-04  8:58 Alexandra Winter
  2026-08-06 13:02 ` Simon Horman
  2026-08-06 16:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexandra Winter @ 2026-08-04  8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hidayath Khan, David Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
	Eric Dumazet, Andrew Lunn
  Cc: netdev, linux-s390, linux-kernel, Heiko Carstens, Vasily Gorbik,
	Alexander Gordeev, Christian Borntraeger, Sven Schnelle,
	Simon Horman, stable

A dibs device interrupt handler can be active after dibs_dev_del() and
may still access dmb_clientid_arr.

Free dmb_clientid_arr in dibs_dev_release() after last reference is gone.
Note that allocating in dibs_dev_add() instead of dibs_dev_alloc() is ok
for now, because no dmbs can be registered before dibs_dev_add().

Fixes: cc21191b584c ("dibs: Move data path to dibs layer")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Co-developed-by: Hidayath Khan <hidayath@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Hidayath Khan <hidayath@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/dibs/dibs_main.c | 14 ++++----------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dibs/dibs_main.c b/drivers/dibs/dibs_main.c
index 14c3e2d84902..f059fefb09bf 100644
--- a/drivers/dibs/dibs_main.c
+++ b/drivers/dibs/dibs_main.c
@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ static void dibs_dev_release(struct device *dev)
 
 	dibs = container_of(dev, struct dibs_dev, dev);
 
+	kfree(dibs->dmb_clientid_arr);
 	kfree(dibs);
 }
 
@@ -194,12 +195,13 @@ int dibs_dev_add(struct dibs_dev *dibs)
 
 	ret = device_add(&dibs->dev);
 	if (ret)
-		goto free_client_arr;
+		return ret;
 
 	ret = sysfs_create_group(&dibs->dev.kobj, &dibs_dev_attr_group);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(&dibs->dev, "sysfs_create_group failed for dibs_dev\n");
-		goto err_device_del;
+		device_del(&dibs->dev);
+		return ret;
 	}
 	mutex_lock(&dibs_dev_list.mutex);
 	mutex_lock(&clients_lock);
@@ -214,13 +216,6 @@ int dibs_dev_add(struct dibs_dev *dibs)
 	mutex_unlock(&dibs_dev_list.mutex);
 
 	return 0;
-
-err_device_del:
-	device_del(&dibs->dev);
-free_client_arr:
-	kfree(dibs->dmb_clientid_arr);
-	return ret;
-
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dibs_dev_add);
 
@@ -247,7 +242,6 @@ void dibs_dev_del(struct dibs_dev *dibs)
 	mutex_unlock(&dibs_dev_list.mutex);
 
 	device_del(&dibs->dev);
-	kfree(dibs->dmb_clientid_arr);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dibs_dev_del);
 
-- 
2.53.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net] net/dibs: Fix UAF of dmb_clientid_arr after dibs_dev_del()
  2026-08-04  8:58 [PATCH net] net/dibs: Fix UAF of dmb_clientid_arr after dibs_dev_del() Alexandra Winter
@ 2026-08-06 13:02 ` Simon Horman
  2026-08-06 16:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2026-08-06 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexandra Winter
  Cc: Hidayath Khan, David Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
	Eric Dumazet, Andrew Lunn, netdev, linux-s390, linux-kernel,
	Heiko Carstens, Vasily Gorbik, Alexander Gordeev,
	Christian Borntraeger, Sven Schnelle, stable

On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 10:58:48AM +0200, Alexandra Winter wrote:
> A dibs device interrupt handler can be active after dibs_dev_del() and
> may still access dmb_clientid_arr.
> 
> Free dmb_clientid_arr in dibs_dev_release() after last reference is gone.
> Note that allocating in dibs_dev_add() instead of dibs_dev_alloc() is ok
> for now, because no dmbs can be registered before dibs_dev_add().
> 
> Fixes: cc21191b584c ("dibs: Move data path to dibs layer")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Co-developed-by: Hidayath Khan <hidayath@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hidayath Khan <hidayath@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net] net/dibs: Fix UAF of dmb_clientid_arr after dibs_dev_del()
  2026-08-04  8:58 [PATCH net] net/dibs: Fix UAF of dmb_clientid_arr after dibs_dev_del() Alexandra Winter
  2026-08-06 13:02 ` Simon Horman
@ 2026-08-06 16:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2026-08-06 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wintera
  Cc: Jakub Kicinski, hidayath, davem, pabeni, edumazet, andrew+netdev,
	netdev, linux-s390, linux-kernel, hca, gor, agordeev, borntraeger,
	svens, horms, stable

This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
net/dibs: Fix UAF of dmb_clientid_arr after dibs_dev_del()

This moves the kfree() of dibs->dmb_clientid_arr out of dibs_dev_del() and
into dibs_dev_release(), so the array survives until the last device
reference is dropped.  The error paths in dibs_dev_add() are converted from
gotos to direct returns and no longer free the array.

> diff --git a/drivers/dibs/dibs_main.c b/drivers/dibs/dibs_main.c
> index 14c3e2d84902e..f059fefb09bf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/dibs/dibs_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/dibs/dibs_main.c
> @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ static void dibs_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>  
>  	dibs = container_of(dev, struct dibs_dev, dev);
>  
> +	kfree(dibs->dmb_clientid_arr);
>  	kfree(dibs);
>  }

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the new ownership rule
here leave a double free of dibs->dmb_clientid_arr in the loopback probe
path?

After this change dibs_dev_release() is the sole owner of the buffer, while
dibs_lo_dev_probe() in drivers/dibs/dibs_loopback.c still frees it itself
when dibs_dev_add() fails:

drivers/dibs/dibs_loopback.c:dibs_lo_dev_probe() {
	...
	ret = dibs_dev_add(dibs);
	if (ret)
		goto err_reg;
	lo_dev = ldev;
	return 0;

err_reg:
	kfree(dibs->dmb_clientid_arr);
	/* pairs with dibs_dev_alloc() */
	put_device(&dibs->dev);
	kfree(ldev);
	...
}

dibs_dev_alloc() leaves the refcount at 1 via device_initialize(), and the
get_device()/put_device() pair inside device_add() nets to zero, so the
put_device() above drops the last reference and runs dibs_dev_release(),
which frees the same pointer a second time.

In the baseline this was already a double free (dibs_dev_add() freed the
array on its free_client_arr path and dibs_lo_dev_probe() freed it again),
so the defect predates the patch, but since this patch is the one that
redefines who owns dmb_clientid_arr, should the kfree() at err_reg in
dibs_lo_dev_probe() be dropped in the same change?

For comparison, drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c:ism_probe() already relies only
on put_device() and has no explicit kfree, so the two callers of the same
exported API currently disagree about ownership:

drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c:ism_probe() {
	...
err_ism:
	ism_dev_exit(ism);
err_dibs:
	/* pairs with dibs_dev_alloc() */
	put_device(&dibs->dev);
	...
}

Since this is tagged for stable, would it be worth also stating the new
caller contract in the changelog, i.e. that callers must only call
put_device() when dibs_dev_add() fails?

> @@ -194,12 +195,13 @@ int dibs_dev_add(struct dibs_dev *dibs)
>  
>  	ret = device_add(&dibs->dev);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto free_client_arr;
> +		return ret;
>  
>  	ret = sysfs_create_group(&dibs->dev.kobj, &dibs_dev_attr_group);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(&dibs->dev, "sysfs_create_group failed for dibs_dev\n");
> -		goto err_device_del;
> +		device_del(&dibs->dev);
> +		return ret;
>  	}

[Severity: High]
These are the two failure returns that reach the loopback err_reg path
described above: device_add() returning an error (-ENOMEM, or a
kobject_add()/duplicate-name failure) and sysfs_create_group() returning
-ENOMEM.  In both cases dmb_clientid_arr is still allocated and not NULLed,
so the caller-side kfree() and dibs_dev_release() both free it.  The
kzalloc-failure case is fine because the pointer is still NULL.

[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue and not introduced by the patch, but the
changelog reasons about the placement of the allocation:

    Note that allocating in dibs_dev_add() instead of dibs_dev_alloc() is ok
    for now, because no dmbs can be registered before dibs_dev_add().

Does that reasoning also cover dibs->lock, which is initialized in the same
place?

drivers/dibs/dibs_main.c:dibs_dev_add() {
	max_dmbs = dibs->ops->max_dmbs();
	spin_lock_init(&dibs->lock);
	dibs->dmb_clientid_arr = kzalloc(max_dmbs, GFP_KERNEL);
	...
}

ism_probe() enables interrupts before that, via ism_dev_init() doing
request_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, 0), ism_handle_irq, ...) plus
register_sba()/register_ieq(), and only calls dibs_dev_add() afterwards.  In
that window dibs comes from kzalloc, so dibs->lock has never been
initialized and dmb_clientid_arr is NULL, yet the handler takes the lock and
indexes the array before any check:

drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c:ism_handle_irq() {
	spin_lock(&dibs->lock);
	ism->sba->s = 0;
	...
		client_id = dibs->dmb_clientid_arr[bit];
		if (unlikely(client_id == NO_DIBS_CLIENT ||
			     !dibs->subs[client_id]))
			continue;
	...
}

The comment in ism_probe() says interrupts and events are ignored before
dibs_dev_add() adds the device to any clients, but that check happens on
dibs->subs[], after the lock acquisition and after the dmb_clientid_arr
dereference.  With CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK or lockdep this window would give
"spinlock bad magic" or "trying to register non-static key" from hardirq
context, and spin_lock_init() in dibs_dev_add() re-zeroing the lock while
the handler may hold it would void mutual exclusion.

Would moving spin_lock_init() and the allocation into dibs_dev_alloc() close
this window?

> @@ -214,13 +216,6 @@ int dibs_dev_add(struct dibs_dev *dibs)
>  	mutex_unlock(&dibs_dev_list.mutex);
>  
>  	return 0;
> -
> -err_device_del:
> -	device_del(&dibs->dev);
> -free_client_arr:
> -	kfree(dibs->dmb_clientid_arr);
> -	return ret;
> -
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dibs_dev_add);

[ ... ]
-- 
pw-bot: cr

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-06 16:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-04  8:58 [PATCH net] net/dibs: Fix UAF of dmb_clientid_arr after dibs_dev_del() Alexandra Winter
2026-08-06 13:02 ` Simon Horman
2026-08-06 16:06 ` Jakub Kicinski

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox