From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Jun Miao <jun.miao@intel.com>,
jarkko@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, kai.huang@intel.com,
challvy.tee@gmail.com, fan.du@intel.com, jun.miao@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qiang.zhang@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/sgx: Fix RCU Tasks stalls in EPC sanitization loop
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 08:06:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202608180846.b3eJmlOU-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623030329.2786571-1-jun.miao@intel.com>
Hi Jun,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on tip/x86/sgx v7.2 next-20260817]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jun-Miao/x86-sgx-Fix-RCU-Tasks-stalls-in-EPC-sanitization-loop/20260815-121253
base: linus/master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260623030329.2786571-1-jun.miao%40intel.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2] x86/sgx: Fix RCU Tasks stalls in EPC sanitization loop
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-bpf (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260818/202608180846.b3eJmlOU-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260818/202608180846.b3eJmlOU-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202608180846.b3eJmlOU-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c: In function '__sgx_sanitize_pages':
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c:109:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'cond_resched_rcu_qs'; did you mean 'cond_resched_lock'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
109 | cond_resched_rcu_qs();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| cond_resched_lock
vim +109 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
54
55 /*
56 * Reset post-kexec EPC pages to the uninitialized state. The pages are removed
57 * from the input list, and made available for the page allocator. SECS pages
58 * prepending their children in the input list are left intact.
59 *
60 * Return 0 when sanitization was successful or kthread was stopped, and the
61 * number of unsanitized pages otherwise.
62 */
63 static unsigned long __sgx_sanitize_pages(struct list_head *dirty_page_list)
64 {
65 unsigned long left_dirty = 0;
66 struct sgx_epc_page *page;
67 LIST_HEAD(dirty);
68 int ret;
69
70 /* dirty_page_list is thread-local, no need for a lock: */
71 while (!list_empty(dirty_page_list)) {
72 if (kthread_should_stop())
73 return 0;
74
75 page = list_first_entry(dirty_page_list, struct sgx_epc_page, list);
76
77 /*
78 * Checking page->poison without holding the node->lock
79 * is racy, but losing the race (i.e. poison is set just
80 * after the check) just means __eremove() will be uselessly
81 * called for a page that sgx_free_epc_page() will put onto
82 * the node->sgx_poison_page_list later.
83 */
84 if (page->poison) {
85 struct sgx_epc_section *section = &sgx_epc_sections[page->section];
86 struct sgx_numa_node *node = section->node;
87
88 spin_lock(&node->lock);
89 list_move(&page->list, &node->sgx_poison_page_list);
90 spin_unlock(&node->lock);
91
92 continue;
93 }
94
95 ret = __eremove(sgx_get_epc_virt_addr(page));
96 if (!ret) {
97 /*
98 * page is now sanitized. Make it available via the SGX
99 * page allocator:
100 */
101 list_del(&page->list);
102 sgx_free_epc_page(page);
103 } else {
104 /* The page is not yet clean - move to the dirty list. */
105 list_move_tail(&page->list, &dirty);
106 left_dirty++;
107 }
108
> 109 cond_resched_rcu_qs();
110 }
111
112 list_splice(&dirty, dirty_page_list);
113 return left_dirty;
114 }
115
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 6:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 3:03 [PATCH v2] x86/sgx: Fix RCU Tasks stalls in EPC sanitization loop Jun Miao
2026-08-18 6:06 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202608180846.b3eJmlOU-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=challvy.tee@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fan.du@intel.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jun.miao@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox