* [PATCH v2] x86/sgx: Fix RCU Tasks stalls in EPC sanitization loop
@ 2026-06-23 3:03 Jun Miao
2026-08-18 6:06 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jun Miao @ 2026-06-23 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jarkko, dave.hansen
Cc: kai.huang, challvy.tee, fan.du, jun.miao, linux-kernel,
qiang.zhang
Large EPC configurations can spend a significant amount of time
sanitizing EPC pages during SGX initialization. The sanitization
loop invokes cond_resched() while processing pages, but if the
scheduler does not request rescheduling, the CPU may remain in the
kernel for an extended period without reporting a quiescent state to
RCU Tasks.
cond_resched() only schedules when rescheduling is needed and does
not guarantee a quiescent state for RCU Tasks. Replace it with
cond_resched_rcu_qs(), which explicitly reports an RCU Tasks
quiescent state even when no context switch occurs.
Kai suggested that, this is a common problem at the scheduler and RCU layer,
but not specific to SGX. More detail please see:
bde6c3aa9930 ("rcu: Provide cond_resched_rcu_qs() to force quiescent states in long loops").
Without this patch, instead, virtual machines (VMs) experience a long OS boot times:
[ 4.110549] systemd[1]: Detected architecture x86-64.
[ 4.115279] systemd[1]: Hostname set to <i2bp1g0g0m0i8406er0g1zX2>.
[ 4.115554] systemd[1]: Installed transient /etc/machine-id file.
[ 14.262158] rcu_tasks_wait_gp: rcu_tasks grace period number 1 (since boot) is 10087 jiffies old.
[ 14.374158] rcu_tasks_wait_gp: rcu_tasks grace period number 1 (since boot) is 40199 jiffies old.
[ 134.806157] rcu_tasks_wait_gp: rcu_tasks grace period number 1 (since boot) is 130631 jiffies old.
[ 248.086158] INFO: task systemd:1 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
[ 248.086491] Not tainted 6.8.0-90-generic #91-Ubuntu
[ 248.086739] 'echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs' disables this message.
[ 248.086993] task:systemd state:D stack:0 pid:1 tpid:1 ppid:0 flags:0x00000002
[ 248.087274] Call Trace:
[ 248.087434] <TASK>
[ 248.087557] __schedule+0x27c/0x6b0
[ 248.087770] schedule+0x33/0x110
[ 248.087939] schedule_timeout+0x157/0x170
[ 248.088120] wait_for_completion+0x88/0x150
[ 248.088304] __wait_rcu_gp+0x17e/0x190
[ 248.088481] synchronize_rcu_tasks_generic+0x64/0x60
[ 248.088672] ? __pfx_call_rcu_tasks+0x10/0x10
[ 248.088858] ? __pfx_wakeme_after_rcu+0x10/0x10
[ 248.089047] synchronize_rcu_tasks+0x15/0x20
[ 248.089260] register_ftrace_direct+0x31f/0x350
[ 248.089445] ? __pfx_bpf_lsm_file_open+0x10/0x10
[ 248.089629] bpf_trampoline_update+0x469/0x650
[ 248.089814] ? 0xffffffffffffffff
[ 248.089988] ? 0xffffffffffffffff
[ 248.090153] __bpf_trampoline_link_prog+0x10d/0x330
[ 248.090339] bpf_trampoline_link_prog+0x33/0x60
[ 248.090518] bpf_tracing_prog_attach+0x3c5/0x5f0
[ 248.090699] link_create+0x1a5/0x280
[ 248.090886] ? security_bpf+0x3c/0x70
[ 248.091101] __sys_bpf+0x4ae/0x10
[ 248.091312] __x64_sys_bpf+0x1a/0x30
[ 248.091477] x64_sys_call+0x199/0x250
[ 248.091647] do_syscall_64+0x7f/0x180
[ 248.091818] ? arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare.isa.0+0x1a/0x60
[ 248.092022] ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0x38/0x1e0
[ 248.092246] ? irqentry_exit+0x43/0x50
[ 248.092401] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x78/0x80
[ 248.092590] RIP: 0033:0x7b53e592728d
[ 248.092756] RSP: 002b:00007ffdaa9d696 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
[ 248.092856] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffdaa9d696 RCX: 00007b53e592728d
[ 248.092956] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffdaa9d696 RDI: 0000000000000001
[ 248.093056] RBP: 00007ffdaa9d696 R08: 00007b53e5a03a8 R09: 00007ffdaa9d696
[ 248.093156] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
[ 248.093256] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00005d81ed2cfd0 R15: 00005d81ed2b7ec0
[ 248.093406] </TASK>
After this patch test Results:
Before fixed: boot time ~50s (with rcu_tasks grace period stall)
After fixed: boot time ~10.7s (systemd-analyze: 724ms kernel + 1.575s initrd + 8.481s userspace = 10.782s)
Reported-by: Challvy Tee <challvy.tee@gmail.com>
Link: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/40423
Fixes: e7e0545299d8 ("x86/sgx: Initialize metadata for Enclave Page Cache (EPC) sections")
Tested-by: Challvy Tee <challvy.tee@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Fan Du <fan.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Fan Du <fan.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jun Miao <jun.miao@intel.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
- Clarify the RCU Tasks stall root cause.
- Use cond_resched_rcu_qs() following the Kai`s suggestion.
- Change the subject of this patch to fitness function.
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
index 4505f808af5e..7ba3d0a5a05d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static unsigned long __sgx_sanitize_pages(struct list_head *dirty_page_list)
left_dirty++;
}
- cond_resched();
+ cond_resched_rcu_qs();
}
list_splice(&dirty, dirty_page_list);
--
2.32.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] x86/sgx: Fix RCU Tasks stalls in EPC sanitization loop
2026-06-23 3:03 [PATCH v2] x86/sgx: Fix RCU Tasks stalls in EPC sanitization loop Jun Miao
@ 2026-08-18 6:06 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2026-08-18 6:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jun Miao, jarkko, dave.hansen
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, kai.huang, challvy.tee, fan.du, jun.miao,
linux-kernel, qiang.zhang
Hi Jun,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on tip/x86/sgx v7.2 next-20260817]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jun-Miao/x86-sgx-Fix-RCU-Tasks-stalls-in-EPC-sanitization-loop/20260815-121253
base: linus/master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260623030329.2786571-1-jun.miao%40intel.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2] x86/sgx: Fix RCU Tasks stalls in EPC sanitization loop
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-bpf (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260818/202608180846.b3eJmlOU-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260818/202608180846.b3eJmlOU-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202608180846.b3eJmlOU-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c: In function '__sgx_sanitize_pages':
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c:109:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'cond_resched_rcu_qs'; did you mean 'cond_resched_lock'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
109 | cond_resched_rcu_qs();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| cond_resched_lock
vim +109 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c
54
55 /*
56 * Reset post-kexec EPC pages to the uninitialized state. The pages are removed
57 * from the input list, and made available for the page allocator. SECS pages
58 * prepending their children in the input list are left intact.
59 *
60 * Return 0 when sanitization was successful or kthread was stopped, and the
61 * number of unsanitized pages otherwise.
62 */
63 static unsigned long __sgx_sanitize_pages(struct list_head *dirty_page_list)
64 {
65 unsigned long left_dirty = 0;
66 struct sgx_epc_page *page;
67 LIST_HEAD(dirty);
68 int ret;
69
70 /* dirty_page_list is thread-local, no need for a lock: */
71 while (!list_empty(dirty_page_list)) {
72 if (kthread_should_stop())
73 return 0;
74
75 page = list_first_entry(dirty_page_list, struct sgx_epc_page, list);
76
77 /*
78 * Checking page->poison without holding the node->lock
79 * is racy, but losing the race (i.e. poison is set just
80 * after the check) just means __eremove() will be uselessly
81 * called for a page that sgx_free_epc_page() will put onto
82 * the node->sgx_poison_page_list later.
83 */
84 if (page->poison) {
85 struct sgx_epc_section *section = &sgx_epc_sections[page->section];
86 struct sgx_numa_node *node = section->node;
87
88 spin_lock(&node->lock);
89 list_move(&page->list, &node->sgx_poison_page_list);
90 spin_unlock(&node->lock);
91
92 continue;
93 }
94
95 ret = __eremove(sgx_get_epc_virt_addr(page));
96 if (!ret) {
97 /*
98 * page is now sanitized. Make it available via the SGX
99 * page allocator:
100 */
101 list_del(&page->list);
102 sgx_free_epc_page(page);
103 } else {
104 /* The page is not yet clean - move to the dirty list. */
105 list_move_tail(&page->list, &dirty);
106 left_dirty++;
107 }
108
> 109 cond_resched_rcu_qs();
110 }
111
112 list_splice(&dirty, dirty_page_list);
113 return left_dirty;
114 }
115
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-18 6:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-23 3:03 [PATCH v2] x86/sgx: Fix RCU Tasks stalls in EPC sanitization loop Jun Miao
2026-08-18 6:06 ` kernel test robot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox