Re: [PATCH v1 03/11] drivers: soc: hisi: Add support for Hisilicon Djtag driver

[Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>]

On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 11:23:35 AM CET John Garry wrote:
> On 07/11/2016 20:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday, November 7, 2016 2:15:10 PM CET John Garry wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Arnd,
> >>
> >> The new bus type tries to model the djtag in a similar way to I2C/USB
> >> driver arch, where we have a host bus adapter and child devices attached
> >> to the bus. The child devices are bus driver devices and have bus
> >> addresses. We think of the djtag as a separate bus, so we are modelling
> >> it as such.
> >>
> >> The bus driver offers a simple host interface for clients to read/write
> >> to the djtag bus: bus accesses are hidden from the client, the host
> >> drives the bus.
> >
> > Ok, in that case we should probably start out by having a bus specific
> > DT binding, and separating the description from that of the bus master
> > device.
> 
> OK
> 
> >
> > I'd suggest requiring #address-cells=<1> and #size-cells=<0> in the master
> > node, and listing the children by reg property. If the address is not
> > easily expressed as a single integer, use a larger #address-cells value.
> 
> We already have something equivalent to reg in "module-id" (see patch 
> 02/11), which is the slave device bus address; here's a sample:
> +		/* For L3 cache PMU */
> +		pmul3c0 {
> +			compatible = "hisilicon,hisi-pmu-l3c-v1";
> +			scl-id = <0x02>;
> +			num-events = <0x16>;
> +			num-counters = <0x08>;
> +			module-id = <0x04>;
> +			num-banks = <0x04>;
> +			cfgen-map = <0x02 0x04 0x01 0x08>;
> +			counter-reg = <0x170>;
> +			evctrl-reg = <0x04>;
> +			event-en = <0x1000000>;
> +			evtype-reg = <0x140>;
> +		};
> 
> FYI, "module-id" is our own internal hw nomenclature.

Yes, that was my interpretation as well. Please use the standard
"reg" property for this then.

> > Another option that we have previously used was to actually pretend that
> > a vendor specific bus is an i2c bus and use the i2c probing infrastructure,
> > but that only makes sense if the software side closely resembles i2c
> > (this was the case for Allwinner I think, but I have not looked at
> > your driver in enough detail to know if it is true here as well).
> >
> 
> OK, let me check this. By chance do you remember the specific AllWinner 
> driver/hw?

drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sun6i-p2wi.c

	Arnd