From: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
To: "Ricardo B. Marlière" <rbm@suse.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] selftests/bpf: Fix lsm_bdev dev_t encoding mismatch
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:11:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2088b8ed-c26c-4120-a3d6-8e6dfbf89f58@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710-selftests-bpf_fixes-v1-3-aa24dfd6f4f9@suse.com>
On 7/10/26 3:09 PM, Ricardo B. Marlière wrote:
> progs/lsm_bdev.c keys its verity_devices hashmap with the raw kernel dev_t
> read straight off bdev->bd_dev, i.e. MKDEV(major, minor) = (major << 20) |
> minor. prog_tests/lsm_bdev.c instead builds its lookup key with dev_key =
> (__u32)st.st_rdev from stat(2), but the stat(2) syscall fills st_rdev via
> the kernel's new_encode_dev(), a different bit layout: (minor & 0xff) |
> (major << 8) | ((minor & ~0xff) << 12).
>
> For any device with a non-trivial major these two values differ, so the
> lookup can never find what the BPF program stored, and test_lsm_bdev()
> always fails with:
>
> test_lsm_bdev:FAIL:map lookup unexpected error: -2 (errno 2)
>
> Reconstruct the raw kernel dev_t from the decoded major/minor instead of
> casting st_rdev directly, restoring the layout the BPF program actually
> reads.
>
> Fixes: 96f4c251a087 ("selftests/bpf: add block device management selftests")
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo B. Marlière <rbm@suse.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_bdev.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_bdev.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_bdev.c
> index a970798e1173..28bc4b117f41 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_bdev.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lsm_bdev.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #include <sys/stat.h>
> +#include <sys/sysmacros.h>
> #include <sys/types.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include "lsm_bdev.skel.h"
> @@ -172,7 +173,7 @@ void test_lsm_bdev(void)
> if (!ASSERT_OK(stat(DM_DEV_PATH, &st), "stat dm dev"))
> goto remove_dm;
>
> - dev_key = (__u32)st.st_rdev;
> + dev_key = (major(st.st_rdev) << 20) | minor(st.st_rdev);
Acked-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
nit: I wonder if there are other tests with this bug. Have you checked?
>
> /* Look up the device in the BPF map and verify. */
> err = bpf_map__lookup_elem(skel->maps.verity_devices,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-16 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 22:09 [PATCH 0/4] selftests/bpf: A few edge case fixes Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-07-10 22:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] selftests/bpf: Install bpftool where test_progs expects to find it Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-07-13 15:32 ` Alexis Lothoré
2026-07-15 21:40 ` Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-07-16 21:09 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-07-10 22:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] selftests/bpf: Install resolve_btfids.test.o.BTF where the test expects it Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-07-16 21:10 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-07-10 22:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests/bpf: Fix lsm_bdev dev_t encoding mismatch Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-07-16 21:11 ` Ihor Solodrai [this message]
2026-07-10 22:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] libbpf: Search /lib64 and /lib in resolve_full_path() Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-07-10 22:58 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-16 21:12 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-07-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 0/4] selftests/bpf: A few edge case fixes Ihor Solodrai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2088b8ed-c26c-4120-a3d6-8e6dfbf89f58@linux.dev \
--to=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=rbm@suse.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox