public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
	Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] nfsd: always release slot when requeueing callback
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2025 12:55:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <223fe6cde92d9b47d12fa47e48f0bc6b8960c1f0.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <184cf63f-d9c3-4948-aae0-efb23a49e188@oracle.com>

On Sat, 2025-02-08 at 11:57 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On 2/7/25 4:53 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > If the callback is going to be requeued to the workqueue, then release
> > the slot. The callback client and session could change and the slot may
> > no longer be valid after that point.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
> > index 79abc981e6416a88d9a81497e03e12faa3ce6d0e..bb5356e8713a8840bb714859618ff88130825efd 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c
> > @@ -1411,6 +1411,7 @@ static bool nfsd4_cb_sequence_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfsd4_callback
> >  	rpc_restart_call_prepare(task);
> >  	goto out;
> >  requeue:
> > +	nfsd41_cb_release_slot(cb);
> >  	if (!test_bit(NFSD4_CLIENT_CB_KILL, &clp->cl_flags)) {
> >  		trace_nfsd_cb_restart(clp, cb);
> >  		task->tk_status = 0;
> > 
> 
> The NFSv4.0 case also goes to the requeue label. Is
> nfsd41_cb_release_slot() a no-op for NFSv4.0?
> 

Yes.

> Even if it is, this is a
> little confusing. Later, in 7/7, the nfsd41_cb_release_slot() call is
> carried into the helper that is called by both NFSv4.0 and NFSv4.1, and
> that doesn't seem necessary.
> 
> Perhaps this change should be done /after/ the NFSv4.0 error flow is
> hoisted into nfsd4_cb_done().
> 

Fair point. I'll move the v4.0 rework ahead of this patch and only call
nfsd41_cb_release_slot for v4.1+. I'll also fix the changelog of #3
like you suggested.
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-08 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-07 21:53 [PATCH v5 0/7] nfsd: CB_SEQUENCE error handling fixes and cleanups Jeff Layton
2025-02-07 21:53 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] nfsd: prepare nfsd4_cb_sequence_done() for error handling rework Jeff Layton
2025-02-07 21:53 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] nfsd: always release slot when requeueing callback Jeff Layton
2025-02-08 16:57   ` Chuck Lever
2025-02-08 17:55     ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2025-02-07 21:53 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] nfsd: only check RPC_SIGNALLED() when restarting rpc_task Jeff Layton
2025-02-08 16:59   ` Chuck Lever
2025-02-07 21:53 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] nfsd: when CB_SEQUENCE gets ESERVERFAULT don't increment seq_nr Jeff Layton
2025-02-08 17:13   ` Chuck Lever
2025-02-07 21:53 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] nfsd: handle CB_SEQUENCE NFS4ERR_BADSLOT better Jeff Layton
2025-02-07 21:53 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] nfsd: handle CB_SEQUENCE NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED error better Jeff Layton
2025-02-08 17:01   ` Chuck Lever
2025-02-08 18:02     ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-08 18:40       ` Tom Talpey
2025-02-08 19:08         ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-08 19:18           ` Tom Talpey
2025-02-08 20:45             ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-08 21:07               ` Chuck Lever
2025-02-09  1:24                 ` Tom Talpey
2025-02-09  2:14                   ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-09 16:26                     ` Tom Talpey
2025-02-09 16:51                       ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-09 16:58                         ` Tom Talpey
2025-02-09 17:05                           ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-09 18:52                             ` Tom Talpey
2025-02-07 21:53 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] nfsd: lift NFSv4.0 handling out of nfsd4_cb_sequence_done() Jeff Layton
2025-02-08 17:05   ` Chuck Lever

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=223fe6cde92d9b47d12fa47e48f0bc6b8960c1f0.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox