The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Cc: Arie van der Hoeven <arie.vanderhoeven@seagate.com>,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rory Chen <rory.c.chen@seagate.com>,
	Glen Valante <glen.valante@linaro.org>,
	Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V10 0/8] block, bfq: extend bfq to support multi-actuator drives
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 08:12:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a413c11-5e5f-7aa2-4734-78cabf393ba2@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3479E7A6-8CAD-4A32-A0BB-00A851883EA7@linaro.org>

On 12/15/22 8:04 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
> 
> 
>> Il giorno 13 dic 2022, alle ore 18:17, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> ha scritto:
>>
>> Please don't top post...
>>
>> On 12/13/22 10:10?AM, Arie van der Hoeven wrote:
>>> We understand being conservative but the code paths only impact on a
>>> product that is not yet in market.  This is version 10 spanning months
>>> with many gaps waiting on review.  It's an interesting case study.
>>
>> That's a nice theory, but that's not how code works. As mentioned, the
>> last version was posted 1-2 weeks later than would've been appropriate
>> for inclusion.
>>
> 
> So, what's the plan?

Looks like 1/8 and 8/8 still need Damien to review it, then queue up for
6.3 when ready. Not sure why this is even a question, it just means that
inclusion is pushed a release out as it missed the current merge window.

-- 
Jens Axboe



      reply	other threads:[~2022-12-15 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-09  9:44 [PATCH V10 0/8] block, bfq: extend bfq to support multi-actuator drives Paolo Valente
2022-12-09  9:44 ` [PATCH V10 1/8] block, bfq: split sync bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis Paolo Valente
2022-12-16  0:00   ` Damien Le Moal
2022-12-20 13:10     ` Paolo Valente
2022-12-21  0:50       ` Damien Le Moal
2022-12-21 10:13         ` Paolo Valente
2022-12-21 10:30           ` Paolo Valente
2022-12-09  9:44 ` [PATCH V10 2/8] block, bfq: forbid stable merging of queues associated with different actuators Paolo Valente
2022-12-09  9:44 ` [PATCH V10 3/8] block, bfq: move io_cq-persistent bfqq data into a dedicated struct Paolo Valente
2022-12-09  9:44 ` [PATCH V10 4/8] block, bfq: turn bfqq_data into an array in bfq_io_cq Paolo Valente
2022-12-09  9:44 ` [PATCH V10 5/8] block, bfq: split also async bfq_queues on a per-actuator basis Paolo Valente
2022-12-09  9:44 ` [PATCH V10 6/8] block, bfq: retrieve independent access ranges from request queue Paolo Valente
2022-12-09  9:44 ` [PATCH V10 7/8] block, bfq: inject I/O to underutilized actuators Paolo Valente
2022-12-09  9:44 ` [PATCH V10 8/8] block, bfq: balance I/O injection among " Paolo Valente
2022-12-16  1:36   ` Damien Le Moal
2022-12-13 15:40 ` [PATCH V10 0/8] block, bfq: extend bfq to support multi-actuator drives Paolo Valente
2022-12-13 15:43   ` Jens Axboe
2022-12-13 17:10     ` Arie van der Hoeven
2022-12-13 17:17       ` Jens Axboe
2022-12-15 15:04         ` Paolo Valente
2022-12-15 15:12           ` Jens Axboe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2a413c11-5e5f-7aa2-4734-78cabf393ba2@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=arie.vanderhoeven@seagate.com \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=glen.valante@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=rory.c.chen@seagate.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox