The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,  rppt@kernel.org,
	 shuah@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	 linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 dmatlack@google.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	 pratyush@kernel.org,  skhawaja@google.com, graf@amazon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] selftests/liveupdate: Test session and file limit removal
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 16:04:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2vxzse7wafmo.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260414200237.444170-4-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> (Pasha Tatashin's message of "Tue, 14 Apr 2026 20:02:35 +0000")

On Tue, Apr 14 2026, Pasha Tatashin wrote:

> With the removal of static limits on the number of sessions and files per
> session, the orchestrator now uses dynamic allocation.
>
> Add new test cases to verify that the system can handle a large number of
> sessions and files. These tests ensure that the dynamic block allocation
> and reuse logic for session metadata and outgoing files work correctly
> beyond the previous static limits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
> ---
>  .../testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 99 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c b/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c
> index 37c808fbe1e9..0eaf97b19267 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>  #include <fcntl.h>
>  #include <string.h>
>  #include <sys/ioctl.h>
> +#include <sys/resource.h>
>  #include <unistd.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/liveupdate.h>
> @@ -386,4 +387,102 @@ TEST_F(liveupdate_device, prevent_double_preservation)
>  	ASSERT_EQ(close(session_fd2), 0);
>  }
>  
> +static void ensure_nofile_limit(struct __test_metadata *_metadata,
> +				long min_limit)
> +{
> +	struct rlimit hl;
> +
> +	if (getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &hl) < 0)
> +		ksft_exit_fail_msg("getrlimit failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> +
> +	if (hl.rlim_cur >= min_limit)
> +		return;
> +
> +	hl.rlim_cur = min_limit;
> +	if (hl.rlim_cur > hl.rlim_max)
> +		hl.rlim_max = hl.rlim_cur;
> +
> +	if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &hl) < 0) {
> +		if (errno == EPERM) {
> +			SKIP(return, "Insufficient privileges to set RLIMIT_NOFILE to %ld",
> +			     hl.rlim_cur);
> +		}
> +		ksft_exit_fail_msg("setrlimit to %ld failed: %s\n",
> +				   hl.rlim_cur, strerror(errno));
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Test Case: Manage Many Sessions
> + *
> + * Verifies that a large number of sessions can be created and then
> + * destroyed during normal system operation. This specifically tests the
> + * dynamic block allocation and reuse logic for session metadata management
> + * without preserving any files.
> + */
> +TEST_F(liveupdate_device, preserve_many_sessions)
> +{
> +#define MANY_SESSIONS 2000
> +	int session_fds[MANY_SESSIONS];
> +	int i;
> +
> +	self->fd1 = open(LIVEUPDATE_DEV, O_RDWR);
> +	if (self->fd1 < 0 && errno == ENOENT)
> +		SKIP(return, "%s does not exist", LIVEUPDATE_DEV);
> +	ASSERT_GE(self->fd1, 0);
> +
> +	ensure_nofile_limit(_metadata, MANY_SESSIONS + 10);
> +	if (_metadata->exit_code == KSFT_SKIP)
> +		return;

Nit: This is strange. Why not just return errno in ensure_nofile_limit()
and handle the skipping here? Same below.

LGTM otherwise.

> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < MANY_SESSIONS; i++) {
> +		char name[64];
> +
> +		snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "many-session-%d", i);
> +		session_fds[i] = create_session(self->fd1, name);
> +		ASSERT_GE(session_fds[i], 0);
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < MANY_SESSIONS; i++)
> +		ASSERT_EQ(close(session_fds[i]), 0);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Test Case: Preserve Many Files
> + *
> + * Verifies that a large number of files can be preserved in a single session
> + * and then destroyed during normal system operation. This tests the dynamic
> + * block allocation and management for outgoing files.
> + */
> +TEST_F(liveupdate_device, preserve_many_files)
> +{
> +#define MANY_FILES 500
> +	int mem_fds[MANY_FILES];
> +	int session_fd;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	self->fd1 = open(LIVEUPDATE_DEV, O_RDWR);
> +	if (self->fd1 < 0 && errno == ENOENT)
> +		SKIP(return, "%s does not exist", LIVEUPDATE_DEV);
> +	ASSERT_GE(self->fd1, 0);
> +
> +	session_fd = create_session(self->fd1, "many-files-test");
> +	ASSERT_GE(session_fd, 0);
> +
> +	ensure_nofile_limit(_metadata, MANY_FILES + 10);
> +	if (_metadata->exit_code == KSFT_SKIP)
> +		return;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < MANY_FILES; i++) {
> +		mem_fds[i] = memfd_create("test-memfd", 0);
> +		ASSERT_GE(mem_fds[i], 0);
> +		ASSERT_EQ(preserve_fd(session_fd, mem_fds[i], i), 0);
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < MANY_FILES; i++)
> +		ASSERT_EQ(close(mem_fds[i]), 0);
> +
> +	ASSERT_EQ(close(session_fd), 0);
> +}
> +
>  TEST_HARNESS_MAIN

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-12 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260414200237.444170-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
     [not found] ` <20260414200237.444170-2-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
2026-05-12 13:35   ` [PATCH 1/5] liveupdate: Remove limit on the number of sessions Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-12 15:55     ` Pasha Tatashin
     [not found] ` <20260414200237.444170-3-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
2026-05-12 13:58   ` [PATCH 2/5] liveupdate: Remove limit on the number of files per session Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-12 20:06     ` Pasha Tatashin
     [not found] ` <20260414200237.444170-4-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
2026-05-12 14:04   ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2026-05-12 20:13     ` [PATCH 3/5] selftests/liveupdate: Test session and file limit removal Pasha Tatashin
     [not found] ` <20260414200237.444170-5-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
2026-05-12 14:09   ` [PATCH 4/5] selftests/liveupdate: Add stress-sessions kexec test Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-12 20:41     ` Pasha Tatashin
     [not found] ` <20260414200237.444170-6-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
2026-05-12 14:10   ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests/liveupdate: Add stress-files " Pratyush Yadav

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2vxzse7wafmo.fsf@kernel.org \
    --to=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhawaja@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox