From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
To: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
shuah@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmatlack@google.com,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, skhawaja@google.com, graf@amazon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] selftests/liveupdate: Test session and file limit removal
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 20:13:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agOJui6EOiJR3cgn@plex> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2vxzse7wafmo.fsf@kernel.org>
On 05-12 16:04, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14 2026, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
>
> > With the removal of static limits on the number of sessions and files per
> > session, the orchestrator now uses dynamic allocation.
> >
> > Add new test cases to verify that the system can handle a large number of
> > sessions and files. These tests ensure that the dynamic block allocation
> > and reuse logic for session metadata and outgoing files work correctly
> > beyond the previous static limits.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
> > ---
> > .../testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c b/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c
> > index 37c808fbe1e9..0eaf97b19267 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/liveupdate/liveupdate.c
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> > #include <fcntl.h>
> > #include <string.h>
> > #include <sys/ioctl.h>
> > +#include <sys/resource.h>
> > #include <unistd.h>
> >
> > #include <linux/liveupdate.h>
> > @@ -386,4 +387,102 @@ TEST_F(liveupdate_device, prevent_double_preservation)
> > ASSERT_EQ(close(session_fd2), 0);
> > }
> >
> > +static void ensure_nofile_limit(struct __test_metadata *_metadata,
> > + long min_limit)
> > +{
> > + struct rlimit hl;
> > +
> > + if (getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &hl) < 0)
> > + ksft_exit_fail_msg("getrlimit failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> > +
> > + if (hl.rlim_cur >= min_limit)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + hl.rlim_cur = min_limit;
> > + if (hl.rlim_cur > hl.rlim_max)
> > + hl.rlim_max = hl.rlim_cur;
> > +
> > + if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &hl) < 0) {
> > + if (errno == EPERM) {
> > + SKIP(return, "Insufficient privileges to set RLIMIT_NOFILE to %ld",
> > + hl.rlim_cur);
> > + }
> > + ksft_exit_fail_msg("setrlimit to %ld failed: %s\n",
> > + hl.rlim_cur, strerror(errno));
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Test Case: Manage Many Sessions
> > + *
> > + * Verifies that a large number of sessions can be created and then
> > + * destroyed during normal system operation. This specifically tests the
> > + * dynamic block allocation and reuse logic for session metadata management
> > + * without preserving any files.
> > + */
> > +TEST_F(liveupdate_device, preserve_many_sessions)
> > +{
> > +#define MANY_SESSIONS 2000
> > + int session_fds[MANY_SESSIONS];
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + self->fd1 = open(LIVEUPDATE_DEV, O_RDWR);
> > + if (self->fd1 < 0 && errno == ENOENT)
> > + SKIP(return, "%s does not exist", LIVEUPDATE_DEV);
> > + ASSERT_GE(self->fd1, 0);
> > +
> > + ensure_nofile_limit(_metadata, MANY_SESSIONS + 10);
> > + if (_metadata->exit_code == KSFT_SKIP)
> > + return;
>
> Nit: This is strange. Why not just return errno in ensure_nofile_limit()
> and handle the skipping here? Same below.
>
> LGTM otherwise.
Good suggestion. Done.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260414200237.444170-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
[not found] ` <20260414200237.444170-2-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
2026-05-12 13:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] liveupdate: Remove limit on the number of sessions Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-12 15:55 ` Pasha Tatashin
[not found] ` <20260414200237.444170-3-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
2026-05-12 13:58 ` [PATCH 2/5] liveupdate: Remove limit on the number of files per session Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-12 20:06 ` Pasha Tatashin
[not found] ` <20260414200237.444170-4-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
2026-05-12 14:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] selftests/liveupdate: Test session and file limit removal Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-12 20:13 ` Pasha Tatashin [this message]
[not found] ` <20260414200237.444170-5-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
2026-05-12 14:09 ` [PATCH 4/5] selftests/liveupdate: Add stress-sessions kexec test Pratyush Yadav
2026-05-12 20:41 ` Pasha Tatashin
[not found] ` <20260414200237.444170-6-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
2026-05-12 14:10 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests/liveupdate: Add stress-files " Pratyush Yadav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agOJui6EOiJR3cgn@plex \
--to=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox