From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ding Xiang <dingxiang@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Subject: Re: Coccinelle: Add a SmPL script for the reconsideration of redundant dev_err() calls
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 21:02:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34d528db-5582-5fe2-caeb-89bcb07a1d30@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1906202046550.3087@hadrien>
>> +@display depends on context@
>> +expression e;
>> +@@
>> + e = devm_ioremap_resource(...);
>> + if (IS_ERR(e))
>> + {
>> +* dev_err(...);
>> + return (...);
>> + }
>
> Why do you assume that there is exactly one dev_err and one return after
> the test?
I propose to start with the addition of a simple source code search pattern.
Would you prefer to clarify a more advanced approach?
>> +@script:python to_do depends on org@
>> +p << or.p;
>> +@@
>> +coccilib.org.print_todo(p[0],
>> + "WARNING: An error message is probably not needed here because the previously called function contains appropriate error reporting.")
>
> "the previously called function" would be better as "devm_ioremap_resource".
Would you like to get the relevant function name dynamically determined?
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-20 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-20 17:30 [PATCH] Coccinelle: Add a SmPL script for the reconsideration of redundant dev_err() calls Markus Elfring
2019-06-20 18:48 ` Julia Lawall
2019-06-20 19:02 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2019-06-20 19:12 ` Julia Lawall
2019-06-20 19:34 ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-21 9:15 ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-21 9:21 ` Julia Lawall
2019-06-21 9:37 ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-21 9:37 ` Markus Elfring
2019-06-21 14:52 ` Julia Lawall
2019-06-20 19:02 ` Markus Elfring
2019-07-01 8:10 ` [PATCH v2] " Markus Elfring
2019-07-01 10:48 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-07-01 12:40 ` [v2] Coccinelle: Suppression of warnings? Markus Elfring
2019-07-01 12:47 ` [PATCH v2] Coccinelle: Add a SmPL script for the reconsideration of redundant dev_err() calls Julia Lawall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=34d528db-5582-5fe2-caeb-89bcb07a1d30@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=dingxiang@cmss.chinamobile.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox