From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>,
Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] iommu/vt-d: Move PRI enablement in probe path
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:53:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34f96069-2fe4-4578-85e2-8d506ef1df14@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB527693E12F3AE890697C00608CC32@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 2/25/25 15:37, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2025 1:16 PM
>>
>> @@ -3743,6 +3743,16 @@ static struct iommu_device
>> *intel_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
>> else
>> info->ats_enabled = 1;
>> }
>> +
>> + if (info->ats_enabled && info->pri_supported) {
>> + /* PASID is required in PRG Response Message. */
>> + if (info->pasid_enabled
>> || !pci_prg_resp_pasid_required(pdev)) {
>
> this should be:
>
> if (!info->pasid_enabled || pci_prg_resp_pasid_required(pdev))
Yes, fixed.
>
>
>> @@ -3761,6 +3771,13 @@ static void intel_iommu_release_device(struct
>> device *dev)
>> struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
>> struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
>>
>> + WARN_ON(info->iopf_refcount);
>
> call iopf_queue_remove_device() in this case?
Yes. I will make it like this,
if (WARN_ON(info->iopf_refcount))
iopf_queue_remove_device(iommu->iopf_queue, dev);
>> +void intel_iommu_disable_iopf(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
>> + struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON(!info->pri_enabled))
>> + return;
>
> also warn on !info->iopf_refcount
Yes, added.
Thanks,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-26 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-24 5:16 [PATCH v2 00/12] iommu: Remove IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA/_IOPF Lu Baolu
2025-02-24 5:16 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Put iopf enablement in the domain attach path Lu Baolu
2025-02-24 5:16 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] iommu/vt-d: Check if SVA is supported when attaching the SVA domain Lu Baolu
2025-02-25 7:23 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-03-04 7:44 ` Yi Liu
2025-02-24 5:16 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] iommu: Remove IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA Lu Baolu
2025-02-25 7:24 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-03-04 7:50 ` Yi Liu
2025-02-24 5:16 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] iommu/vt-d: Move scalable mode ATS enablement to probe path Lu Baolu
2025-02-25 7:28 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-02-26 2:21 ` Baolu Lu
2025-03-04 7:55 ` Yi Liu
2025-02-24 5:16 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] iommu/vt-d: Move PRI enablement in " Lu Baolu
2025-02-25 7:37 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-02-26 3:53 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2025-02-24 5:16 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] iommu/vt-d: Cleanup intel_context_flush_present() Lu Baolu
2025-02-25 7:43 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-02-26 3:57 ` Baolu Lu
2025-02-26 5:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-03-04 8:43 ` Yi Liu
2025-03-05 2:21 ` Baolu Lu
2025-03-05 3:34 ` Yi Liu
2025-03-05 5:36 ` Baolu Lu
2025-02-24 5:16 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] iommu/vt-d: Put iopf enablement in domain attach path Lu Baolu
2025-02-25 8:02 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-02-24 5:16 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] iommufd/selftest: " Lu Baolu
2025-02-25 8:16 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-02-26 4:06 ` Baolu Lu
2025-02-24 5:16 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] dmaengine: idxd: Remove unnecessary IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF Lu Baolu
2025-02-25 8:16 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-02-24 5:16 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] uacce: " Lu Baolu
2025-02-24 10:00 ` Zhangfei Gao
2025-02-25 8:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-02-24 5:16 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] iommufd: " Lu Baolu
2025-02-25 8:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-02-24 5:16 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] iommu: Remove iommu_dev_enable/disable_feature() Lu Baolu
2025-02-25 8:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-02-24 9:58 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] iommu: Remove IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA/_IOPF Zhangfei Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=34f96069-2fe4-4578-85e2-8d506ef1df14@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox