From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] asm-generic, x86: Add bitops instrumentation for KASAN
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 14:23:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <377465ba-3b31-31e7-0f9d-e0a5ab911ca4@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+aVB3jK_M0-2D_QTq=nncVXTsNp77kjSwBwjqn-3hAJmA@mail.gmail.com>
On 5/29/19 1:57 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 12:30 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 12:16:31PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
>>> On Wed, 29 May 2019 at 12:01, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 11:20:17AM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
>>>>> For the default, we decided to err on the conservative side for now,
>>>>> since it seems that e.g. x86 operates only on the byte the bit is on.
>>>>
>>>> This is not correct, see for instance set_bit():
>>>>
>>>> static __always_inline void
>>>> set_bit(long nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
>>>> {
>>>> if (IS_IMMEDIATE(nr)) {
>>>> asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "orb %1,%0"
>>>> : CONST_MASK_ADDR(nr, addr)
>>>> : "iq" ((u8)CONST_MASK(nr))
>>>> : "memory");
>>>> } else {
>>>> asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX __ASM_SIZE(bts) " %1,%0"
>>>> : : RLONG_ADDR(addr), "Ir" (nr) : "memory");
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> That results in:
>>>>
>>>> LOCK BTSQ nr, (addr)
>>>>
>>>> when @nr is not an immediate.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the clarification. Given that arm64 already instruments
>>> bitops access to whole words, and x86 may also do so for some bitops,
>>> it seems fine to instrument word-sized accesses by default. Is that
>>> reasonable?
>>
>> Eminently -- the API is defined such; for bonus points KASAN should also
>> do alignment checks on atomic ops. Future hardware will #AC on unaligned
>> [*] LOCK prefix instructions.
>>
>> (*) not entirely accurate, it will only trap when crossing a line.
>> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1556134382-58814-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com
>
> Interesting. Does an address passed to bitops also should be aligned,
> or alignment is supposed to be handled by bitops themselves?
>
It should be aligned. This even documented in Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst:
Native atomic bit operations are defined to operate on objects aligned
to the size of an "unsigned long" C data type, and are least of that
size. The endianness of the bits within each "unsigned long" are the
native endianness of the cpu.
> This probably should be done as a separate config as not related to
> KASAN per se. But obviously via the same
> {atomicops,bitops}-instrumented.h hooks which will make it
> significantly easier.
>
Agreed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-29 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-28 16:32 [PATCH 1/3] lib/test_kasan: Add bitops tests Marco Elver
2019-05-28 16:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] tools/objtool: add kasan_check_* to uaccess whitelist Marco Elver
2019-05-28 17:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29 8:54 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-05-29 9:46 ` Marco Elver
2019-05-29 9:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-28 16:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] asm-generic, x86: Add bitops instrumentation for KASAN Marco Elver
2019-05-28 16:50 ` Mark Rutland
2019-05-29 8:53 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-05-29 9:20 ` Marco Elver
2019-05-29 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29 10:16 ` Marco Elver
2019-05-29 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29 10:57 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-05-29 11:20 ` David Laight
2019-05-29 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29 11:23 ` Andrey Ryabinin [this message]
2019-05-29 11:29 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-05-29 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-29 13:26 ` Mark Rutland
2019-05-28 16:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] lib/test_kasan: Add bitops tests Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=377465ba-3b31-31e7-0f9d-e0a5ab911ca4@virtuozzo.com \
--to=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox