public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC] vm86 bugs in 2.5.30
@ 2002-08-10  8:49 Kasper Dupont
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kasper Dupont @ 2002-08-10  8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux-Kernel

I'm trying to port the vm86 bugfixes from 2.4.19 to 2.5.30.
A premature patch is available at:
http://www.daimi.au.dk/~kasperd/linux_kernel/vm86.2.5.30.patch
The second chunk in mark_screen_rdonly had to be applied by
hand, so I'd appreachiate if whoever made that bugfix would
verify I got the patch applied correctly.

I am however currently fighting with another vm86 problem.
I get this oops on 2.5.30:

<4> invalid operand: 0000
<4>CPU:    0
<4>EIP:    0000:[<00000000>]    Not tainted
<4>EFLAGS: 00030282
<4>eax: 00000000   ebx: 00000000   ecx: 00000000   edx: 00000000
<4>esi: 00000000   edi: 00000000   ebp: 00000000   esp: cb5dbf24
<4>ds: 0000   es: 0000   ss: 0018
<4>Stack: 00007c00 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 
<4>       00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 
<4>       00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 
<4>Call Trace: [<c0108c87>] 
<4>Code:  Bad EIP value.

>>EIP; 00000000 Before first symbol
Trace; c0108c87 <syscall_call+7/b>

It happens during the vm86 system call, but it is not fixed
by any of the changes in vm86.c. Who remember which patch
fixed this problem?

-- 
Kasper Dupont -- der bruger for meget tid på usenet.
For sending spam use mailto:razrep@daimi.au.dk
or mailto:mcxumhvenwblvtl@skrammel.yaboo.dk

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] vm86 bugs in 2.5.30
@ 2002-08-10 19:52 Stas Sergeev
  2002-08-10 20:10 ` Kasper Dupont
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stas Sergeev @ 2002-08-10 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kasper Dupont; +Cc: linux-kernel

Hello.

Kasper Dupont wrote:
> <4> invalid operand: 0000 
> <4>Code: Bad EIP value. 
> It happens during the vm86 system call, but it is not fixed 
> by any of the changes in vm86.c. Who remember which patch 
> fixed this problem?
This one:
http://dosemu.sourceforge.net/stas/traps.diff
Was not included in 2.4.19, exists only in -ac
for now.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-08-10 20:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-10  8:49 [RFC] vm86 bugs in 2.5.30 Kasper Dupont
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-10 19:52 Stas Sergeev
2002-08-10 20:10 ` Kasper Dupont

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox