Re: [patch] __func__ -> __FUNCTION__

[Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>]

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 11:17:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > It is a requirement of the SPARC port that Linux be compilable
> > by egcs-1.1.2, aka gcc-2.91.66.
> >
> > That compiler does not support __func__.
> 
> Is there any reason to not use __FUNCTION__?  According to the gcc folks
> that there is no plan to retire it, and as long as all known-good kernel
> compilers support it a gccism is a lot better than a standard feature that
> is not supported by most of the kernel compilers.

Sounds fine to me.

--- linux-2.5.31/include/linux/kernel.h	Wed Jul 24 14:31:31 2002
+++ 25/include/linux/kernel.h	Tue Aug 13 01:48:36 2002
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <linux/compiler.h>
 
+#define __func__ use.__FUNCTION__.not.__func__
+
 /* Optimization barrier */
 /* The "volatile" is due to gcc bugs */
 #define barrier() __asm__ __volatile__("": : :"memory")

It affects

drivers/char/drm/mga_dma.c
drivers/char/drm/mga_drv.h
drivers/char/drm/mga_state.c
drivers/char/drm/r128_cce.c
drivers/char/drm/r128_drv.h
drivers/char/drm/r128_state.c
drivers/char/drm/radeon_cp.c
drivers/char/drm/radeon_drv.h
drivers/char/drm/radeon_state.c
include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h