Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add extended attributes to ext2/3

[Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>]

Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> 
> ..
> > This should be converted to use sector_t for >2TB support, and tested
> > with CONFIG_LBD=y and n.
> 
> e_block is the block number; the e_indexes are hash values. Ext[23] only has
> 32bit block numbers. Am I getting you wrong?

Well it depends how generic the mbcache code is supposed to be.

The kernel has just gained supoprt for 64-bit sectors on ia32
and PPC32 but the new mbcache code will not support that.

I guess if there are no current 64-bit users of mbcache then
it can be deferred until there is a need.

> > The use of a dev_t search key is a bit old-fashioned.  Maybe
> > use the address of inode->i_sb->s_bdev?
> 
> That would do as well.
> 
> A related issue:
> 
> Would switching to a more decent hash algorithm in fs/ext?/xattr.c make sense?
> I think there are better ones in 2.5. This would only degrade sharing on
> "legacy" systems for a while, but the slow down would vanish over time.

Might do.  There's hash_long() in <linux/hash.h>