From: george anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Michael Hohnbaum <hbaum@us.ibm.com>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.5.34_vsyscall_A0
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 12:30:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DB0613C.D07A0913@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.44.0210181018070.21302-100000@home.transmeta.com
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 09:45:41AM -0700, george anzinger wrote:
> > > Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > current cpu (and maybe current pid) somehow. And it would be possible
> > > > to avoid preemption while in a vsyscall text page, some other Unix
> > > > variants do this to implement portions of the thread library in kernel
> > > > provided user text pages.
> > > >
> > > Now there is an idea! Lock preemption in user space if and
> >
> > sounds not good to me, you would miss a wakeup and you would delay the
> > schedule of 1/HZ in the worst (close to the common) case.
>
> That's not the real problem.
>
> The real problem is that somebody can jump into the middle of a function
> (or even into the middle of an instruction), causing the function to do
> something totally different from the intended effect.
>
> In particular, it can cause the function to loop forever.
>
> If you disable preemption of user space, you now killed the machine.
>
> In short - others may do it, but it's a total _DISASTER_ from a security
> and stability standpoint. Don't go there.
Oops, hadn't thought of that. Back out, undo, etc. :)
--
George Anzinger george@mvista.com
High-res-timers:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Preemption patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-18 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-18 4:25 [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.5.34_vsyscall_A0 john stultz
2002-10-18 4:26 ` [RFC] linux-2.5.34_vsyscall_A0 - Test App john stultz
2002-10-18 11:14 ` [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.5.34_vsyscall_A0 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-18 16:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2002-10-18 16:45 ` george anzinger
2002-10-18 17:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-18 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-18 17:21 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-18 18:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
2002-10-18 18:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-18 19:30 ` george anzinger [this message]
2002-10-18 17:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-21 13:18 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-21 17:15 ` john stultz
2002-10-18 16:39 ` john stultz
2002-10-18 18:54 ` [RFC] vsyscall_A0 LD_PRELOAD implementation john stultz
2002-10-21 22:44 ` [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.5.34_vsyscall_A0 Stephen Hemminger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-18 18:21 Manfred Spraul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DB0613C.D07A0913@mvista.com \
--to=george@mvista.com \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=hbaum@us.ibm.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox